Fruit Heights Land Conveyance Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Moore (UT)
In Committee
Summary
Transfers approximately 295.9 acres of National Forest land in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache to Fruit Heights, Utah, for public use. The bill would direct the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, to convey the property by quitclaim deed within 30 days of enactment at no cost, subject to valid existing rights and a reserved easement for the Bonneville Shoreline Trail, require the city to pay for a survey and reasonable administrative survey costs, allow the Secretary to correct minor map errors and attach other terms to protect U.S. interests, and make the land revert to the United States if it is used for anything other than public purposes.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Fruit Heights receives Forest land
If enacted, the bill would direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey about 295.89 acres of Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest land to the City of Fruit Heights. The transfer would be by quitclaim deed, without consideration, and would occur not later than 30 days after enactment. The deed would reserve an easement for the Bonneville Shoreline Trail and allow the Secretary to correct minor map errors and keep the map on file for public inspection. The exact acreage would be set by a survey the city must pay for, and the city would pay reasonable survey and related administrative costs. The land must be used only for public purposes and could revert to the United States if used inconsistently, and the Secretary could add other terms to protect U.S. interests.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Moore (UT)
UT • R
Cosponsors
Maloy
UT • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR3151 — SHIPS for America Act of 2025
Rebuild U.S. commercial shipbuilding and a U.S.-flag strategic fleet by pairing new tax credits, grants, and operating payments with stronger cargo-preference rules and workforce and innovation programs to restore domestic capacity and sealift readiness. It centralizes maritime strategy in a White House advisor and a Maritime Security Board and funds a broad set of industrial, port, and training programs to favor U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed vessels.
HR2725 — Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2025
Rewrites and expands the Low‑Income Housing Tax Credit to boost construction and affordability for very low‑income renters. It would rename the program the Affordable Housing Credit and change how states get credits, who counts as low‑income, and how projects qualify and claim credits. - Families and residents: Would change tenant rules so most full‑time students under age 24 do not count as low‑income occupants, allow tenant‑based voucher payments to be excluded from rent calculations in certain projects, and add protections for survivors of domestic violence and for veterans. - Developers and owners: Would raise state allocations and set the minimum allocation at $4,876,000 in 2025, create a bigger credit when at least 20% of units serve extremely low‑income households, treat relocation costs as eligible rehab expenses, and tighten acquisition‑basis and foreclosure timing rules. - States, tribes, and rural areas: Would require housing agencies to apply community revitalization and cost‑reasonableness criteria, add Indian areas and rural areas to difficult development area rules with specific NAHASDA exceptions, and bar prioritizing local official approval or contributions in allocation plans.
HR137 — TCJA Permanency Act
Rewrite of individual income tax rates would remake brackets, reshape family tax benefits, and change rules for pass‑through businesses and the alternative minimum tax. The bill would permanently set new tax tables with inflation adjustments, overhaul the child tax credit and standard deduction framework, and make numerous conforming changes across the tax code.
HR2548 — Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025
Automatic, recurring sanctions on the Russian government and its affiliates. This bill would create a multi-layered sanctions regime that forces mandatory measures within 15 days of a covered determination and requires reassessment every 90 days. - U.S. financial institutions and investors: Banks, brokers, and U.S. investment funds would be barred from processing transfers to the Russian Federation, buying Russian sovereign debt, or making monetary investments in entities owned or controlled by the Russian government. Many prohibitions would take effect within 15 days of a covered determination and recur every 90 days. - Energy, trade, and commodities: The bill would ban U.S. exports of energy to Russia, bar investments in the Russian energy sector, and prohibit imports of uranium sourced from Russia or Rosatom. It would also raise duties on imports from Russia to not less than 500 percent and allow similar duties on third countries trading in Russian-origin energy commodities. - Individuals, exchanges, and payment networks: High‑ranking Russian officials, oligarchs, and sector actors would face property blocks and visa ineligibility under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The SEC would be directed to bar listing or trading of Russian‑affiliated issuers and global financial messaging providers could be sanctioned for continuing service to designated banks.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR302 — Water Rights Protection Act
This bill would bar federal agencies from conditioning permits, leases, or other land-use approvals on transferring state or tribal water rights to the United States. It would also require federal officials to respect and coordinate with State water laws and definitions when setting permit terms.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in