Chloe Cole Act
Sponsored By: Representative Onder
Introduced
Summary
This bill would ban gender-transition medical treatments for anyone under 18 and give harmed children and their parents the right to sue providers in federal court.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
4 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
Right to sue over childhood treatments
If enacted, people who had these treatments as minors—or their parents or guardians—could sue providers in federal court. They could seek economic costs (including detransition care), pain and suffering, and punitive damages if they prove by clear and convincing evidence that the provider acted maliciously, intentionally, fraudulently, or recklessly. You could sue over acts before or after enactment, subject to the time limits. The time limit would be the later of 25 years after the 18th birthday or 4 years after a detransition cost. For acts after enactment, providers would face strict liability and would have to prove any listed exception by clear and convincing evidence. Courts would give less weight to old medical standards if they conflicted with the Act’s intent and the provider knew the science was in serious dispute. Providers could not require you to waive these rights.
Federal limits on gender care for minors
If enacted, this bill would bar doctors and hospitals from giving minors puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries to change sex traits when federal triggers apply. Participating would include planning, prescribing, authorizing, administering, or performing the care. Federal scope would apply if there is interstate travel, payments, communications, or equipment crossing state lines, or if it occurs in D.C., U.S. territories, or maritime jurisdiction. A child means under 18. Care could still be allowed for verifiable disorders of sexual development, urgent injuries or illnesses, treatment of complications, or detransition care, but providers would need clear and convincing evidence the exception fits before starting.
Counseling allowed without provider liability
If enacted, the bill would not let someone sue just for counseling, referrals, or talking about treatment options, including options after age 18. This protection would apply only if the discussion is not “participation” as the bill defines it and does not meet the federal triggers. Health professionals would still be able to explain risks, benefits, and their medical opinions.
If one part falls, rest stands
If enacted, the bill would say that if a court strikes one part, the rest would stay in effect. This is a legal backstop and does not itself change who gets benefits or pays money.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Onder
MO • R
Cosponsors
Carter (GA)
GA • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Murphy
NC • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
McCormick
GA • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Fleischmann
TN • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Moore (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Baird
IN • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Rose
TN • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Moore (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Taylor
OH • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Simpson
ID • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Biggs (SC)
SC • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Harris (MD)
MD • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Aderholt
AL • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Ogles
TN • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Collins
GA • R
Sponsored 9/18/2025
Stutzman
IN • R
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Brecheen
OK • R
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 9/26/2025
Hageman
WY • R
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Miller (IL)
IL • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Jack
GA • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Roy
TX • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Rulli
OH • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
McGuire
VA • R
Sponsored 10/14/2025
Nehls
TX • R
Sponsored 10/14/2025
Barr
KY • R
Sponsored 10/28/2025
McDowell
NC • R
Sponsored 11/4/2025
Babin
TX • R
Sponsored 11/4/2025
Cline
VA • R
Sponsored 11/4/2025
Steube
FL • R
Sponsored 11/4/2025
Loudermilk
GA • R
Sponsored 11/12/2025
Guest
MS • R
Sponsored 11/12/2025
LaMalfa
CA • R
Sponsored 12/2/2025
Palmer
AL • R
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Moore (NC)
NC • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Messmer
IN • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Fine
FL • R
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR425 — Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Ends the Corporate Transparency Act and removes its amendments from federal law. It also adjusts related U.S. Code citations and parts of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 to reflect that repeal. - Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act as title LXIV of division F of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) and removes all amendments made by that Act. - Edits Title 31, United States Code by removing or changing cross-references that mentioned section 5336 and updating references in sections 5321 and 5322. - Alters the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 by repealing section 6502 and striking or modifying portions of section 6509 as described in the bill.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR404 — Hearing Protection Act
This bill would reclassify firearm silencers under federal law by removing them from the National Firearms Act's definition of “firearm” and creating a parallel federal licensing and tax framework. It would also preempt state and local silencer taxes and require destruction of prior federal silencer records. - Owners and buyers: People acquiring or possessing silencers would be subject to a federal licensing and registration regime under Chapter 44 of Title 18, even as silencers are taken out of the NFA firearm definition. - State and local governments: Would be barred from imposing taxes, special registration, marking, or recordkeeping on silencers beyond ordinary sales or use taxes. - Records and industry rules: Would require destruction of existing silencer entries in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record within 365 days, mandate serial-number marking on silencers, and add a 10 percent federal excise tax on silencers sold by manufacturers or importers.
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
HR21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in