AI OVERWATCH Act
Sponsored By: Representative Mast
Introduced
Summary
This bill would impose tight new export controls on high‑performance integrated circuits to block their transfer to certain "countries of concern." It also creates a narrow exemption for verified U.S. entities and builds in stepped-up technical updates and Congressional review.
Show full summary
- U.S. chip makers and exporters would face a new license requirement for defined "covered integrated circuits" sent to entities in listed countries of concern, with no general license allowed and prior licenses to those countries terminated.
- Firms that qualify as a "Trusted United States Person" could be exempted if they meet security, ownership, sourcing, and audit rules, including a limit that no more than 10 percent of ultimate beneficial ownership may be held by any entity primarily domiciled in a country of concern and a 90‑day window for BIS to seek public input on standards.
- Licenses would need a 30‑day certification to relevant congressional committees before approval and could be blocked by an expedited joint resolution; the bill also requires a national security strategy and a DNI FY2026 assessment of China’s CIC capabilities.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
New licenses to send high-end chips abroad
This bill would require a license to export, reexport, or transfer covered high‑end chips to entities in, or ultimately owned from, certain countries. The listed countries would include China (with Hong Kong and Macau), Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela under Maduro. No general license could be used; any old licenses for these transfers would end on enactment. Agencies would need to send Congress the license file at least 30 days before approval, including ECCNs, technical specs, end users, conditions, and security certifications; Congress could block the deal in that window. All such licenses would be denied until 14 days after a required national security strategy is sent to Congress. Covered chips would include items under ECCN 3A090 or 4A090 (and similar/related items, including certain 5A002.z products) or chips that meet set thresholds: total processing performance of 4,800+; or 2,400+ with performance density 1.6+; or 1,600+ with performance density 3.2+; or DRAM bandwidth 1,400 GB/s+, or interconnect 1,100 GB/s+, or both totaling 1,700 GB/s+. Products that contain such chips would also be covered, unless not designed or marketed for data centers. Calculations would follow Commerce Control List 3A090 as of December 15, 2025, and parameters could change 18 months after the strategy if a policy committee approves by majority vote.
National security plan on advanced chips
The bill would require the Secretary of Commerce to send Congress a national security strategy on access by countries of concern to covered chips, tools, and parts. It would assess how exports change those countries’ military, intelligence, surveillance, and cyber capabilities. The Director of National Intelligence would also deliver a fiscal year 2026 assessment of China’s chip production. That report would say whether access to U.S.‑designed chips would change China’s indigenous output, compare output and capability to the U.S. and allies, and include a quantitative look at AI capability under indigenous‑only production.
Trusted exporter program for advanced chips
If enacted, Commerce would create a "Trusted United States Person" designation within 90 days. Firms could apply, but at most 10% of ultimate beneficial ownership could be tied to a country of concern. A trusted firm could not install a majority of its total covered‑chip processing power outside the U.S. It would need strong physical and cyber security, remote‑access controls, secure repair and disposal, and yearly audits. Some license rules (EAR 742.6, 744.23) would not apply when covered chips go to non‑concern countries and remain owned and controlled by the trusted firm or its subsidiaries once in operation. Commerce would also consider secure ways to extend this relief to close allies.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Mast
FL • R
Cosponsors
Huizenga
MI • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Moolenaar
MI • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Kim
CA • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Self
TX • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
Crawford
AR • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
LaHood
IL • R
Sponsored 12/18/2025
McCaul
TX • R
Sponsored 1/7/2026
Davidson
OH • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Kean
NJ • R
Sponsored 1/8/2026
Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]
GU • R
Sponsored 1/16/2026
Baird
IN • R
Sponsored 1/16/2026
Fine
FL • R
Sponsored 1/16/2026
Moran
TX • R
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Lawler
NY • R
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Miller (OH)
OH • R
Sponsored 1/20/2026
Meeks
NY • D
Sponsored 1/21/2026
Newhouse
WA • R
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Kamlager-Dove
CA • D
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Sherman
CA • D
Sponsored 1/22/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR452 — Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act
This law awards Congressional Gold Medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team as a formal recognition of their Lake Placid victory and its lasting effect on American morale and the sport of hockey. It directs the Treasury to strike the medals and sets rules for duplicates, display, and funding. - Team legacy and public recognition: The Act honors the 1980 team with a symbolic national award that reinforces their historical and cultural significance for fans, players, and communities connected to the game. - Museum displays and research access: One gold medal goes to the Lake Placid Olympic Center, one to the United States Hockey Hall of Fame Museum in Eveleth, Minnesota, and one to the United States Olympic & Paralympic Museum in Colorado Springs for display and research. - Mint operations and collectibles: The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the medals, may sell bronze duplicates at prices that cover costs, and classifies the medals as national and numismatic items. The U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund pays for production and receives proceeds from duplicate sales.
HR5401 — Pay Our Troops Act of 2026
Guarantees continued pay for military personnel during a federal funding gap. This bill would create a temporary appropriation to keep pay and allowances flowing for active-duty service members and the civilians and contractors who directly support them if FY2026 regular appropriations are not in effect.
HR842 — Nancy Gardner Sewell Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act
Would expand Medicare to cover multi-cancer early detection screening tests. It defines eligible tests as certain FDA-cleared or approved genomic blood tests or comparable biological-sample tests and directs the Secretary to use the national coverage determinations process to decide when they are covered.
HR1262 — Mikaela Naylon Give Kids a Chance Act
Speeds and strengthens pediatric cancer drug development. It expands which cancer products companies must study in children, reshapes organ transplant network governance and fees, and adds new FDA international and transparency steps. - Children with cancer and researchers: Requires pediatric studies that produce clinically meaningful data on dosing, safety, and early effectiveness and widens the kinds of drug combinations studied. It also sets aside $25 million for pediatric drug studies in each of fiscal years 2026, 2027, and 2028. - Transplant patients and transplant network members: Changes Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network governance and financing by allowing quarterly registration fees, requiring those fees fund OPTN operations, improving electronic health record integration, and calling for a GAO review within two years. - FDA partners and drug makers: Creates an Abraham Accords Office to boost regulatory coordination and technical assistance abroad, and forces more transparency during generic (ANDA) reviews about whether generics are qualitatively and quantitatively the same as listed drugs. It also raises the Medicare Improvement Fund amount from $1.4 billion to $2.6 billion. Increases federal outlays by roughly $1.3 billion, driven by a $1.2 billion boost to the Medicare Improvement Fund and $75 million for pediatric studies, adding to federal spending.
HR1329 — Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act
Authorize the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum within the Reserve of the National Mall. It would remove an earlier site-designation limit, set a transfer and notification process for federal land, require exhibits to reflect diverse and authentic women's experiences with defined guidance, and mandate regular reports to Congress. - Smithsonian and the Board of Regents — Would be able to place the museum inside the National Mall Reserve and the bill removes a prior limiting phrase that constrained site designation. - Other federal agencies — Must receive notice before a site under their administrative jurisdiction is designated. The agency head must promptly notify specified House and Senate committees and then transfer administrative jurisdiction as soon as practicable. - Museum visitors and Congress — The Council must ensure exhibits and programs accurately represent varied cultures, histories, events, and values of women and seek guidance from a broad array of knowledgeable and respected sources with definitions for those terms. The Secretary must report to Congress 120 days after enactment and every two years on actions taken and planning.
HR1422 — Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025
Targets Iran's energy revenue through global sanctions. This bill would create a broad sanctions framework to punish foreign persons who process, export, or sell Iran-origin oil, condensates, gas, LNG, or petrochemical products. It pairs blocking of assets and visa bans with ownership-based triggers, waivers, humanitarian carve-outs, and new reporting to limit Iran's access to energy markets and finance for weapons and terrorism. - Foreign energy firms and financial institutions would face blocking of property and bans on transactions if they knowingly handle Iran-origin energy or are 50% or more owned by such actors. Associated aliens could become inadmissible and have visas revoked. - Maritime operators, insurers, flag registries, and LNG pipeline facilities would be exposed to sanctions risk when linked to Iran-origin shipments, though safety-of-crew rules and specific exemptions for imports remain. - Humanitarian organizations would keep explicit exemptions for agricultural commodities, food, medicine, medical devices, and humanitarian assistance to avoid disrupting aid. - U.S. agencies and private companies would see new duties: an interagency working group and multilateral contact group would coordinate enforcement, and private-sector reporting would be required to flag evasion and proceeds from intercepted Iran-origin energy sales.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in