Fair Access to Banking Act
Sponsored By: Representative Barr
Introduced
Summary
Prevents banks and payment networks from cutting off customers for political or reputational reasons. It sets a national standard that forces objective, risk-based decisions and creates a private right of action for people and businesses harmed by unfair denials.
Show full summary
- Families and households keep access to bank accounts and payment services without being excluded for politics or reputation, and any denial must include a written, quantifiable justification.
- Lawful businesses and nonprofits, including politically unpopular ones, gain protection from category-based refusals and can sue for treble damages and attorney’s fees if a covered institution violates the rules.
- Banks, credit unions, and payment networks must adopt impartial, data-driven risk standards, may face civil penalties, and large institutions that refuse service could lose access to discount window lending or automated clearing house services.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Card networks barred from blocking customers
If enacted, payment card networks and related firms could not block or limit a lawful person from getting network services because of political or reputational risk. The rule would cover networks, subsidiaries, agents, processors, and licensed members when the person is complying with the law. The Comptroller could fine a network up to 10% of the value of the affected services, but no more than $10,000 per violation. This would protect access to widely used card services for customers and merchants.
Limits on very large banks' access
If enacted, member banks and some state banks or credit unions that refuse to do business with lawful persons could lose access to key infrastructure. Member banks with more than $50 billion in assets could be barred from the Federal Reserve discount window if they refuse lawful customers. Banks and covered credit unions with more than $50 billion could be blocked from using the ACH Network for that reason. The bill would also add nonmember banks, trust companies, very large insured institutions (over $500 billion), and refusing insured credit unions to related supervisory lists or conditions.
New fair-access rules for banks
If enacted, a bank with $50 billion or more in assets would be presumed a 'covered bank'. Banks could submit papers to the Office of the Comptroller to rebut that presumption. Covered banks would have to offer each service to people in their market on proportionally equal terms and could only deny service for documented, impartial, risk-based reasons set in advance. Anyone harmed could sue in federal court without using agency steps first, and courts could award attorney fees, costs, and triple damages.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Barr
KY • R
Cosponsors
Meuser
PA • R
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Franklin, Scott
FL • R
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Clyde
GA • R
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Harrigan
NC • R
Sponsored 2/5/2025
Arrington
TX • R
Sponsored 2/6/2025
Fitzgerald
WI • R
Sponsored 2/6/2025
Foxx
NC • R
Sponsored 2/6/2025
Higgins (LA)
LA • R
Sponsored 2/6/2025
Rogers (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Buchanan
FL • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Van Duyne
TX • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Weber (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Estes
KS • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Scott, Austin
GA • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Finstad
MN • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Tenney
NY • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Strong
AL • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Self
TX • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Yakym
IN • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Graves
MO • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
DesJarlais
TN • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Amodei (NV)
NV • R
Sponsored 2/11/2025
Smith (NE)
NE • R
Sponsored 2/11/2025
Moore (AL)
AL • R
Sponsored 2/11/2025
Rutherford
FL • R
Sponsored 2/11/2025
Downing
MT • R
Sponsored 2/12/2025
Boebert
CO • R
Sponsored 2/12/2025
Collins
GA • R
Sponsored 2/12/2025
Burlison
MO • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Lee (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Bergman
MI • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Pfluger
TX • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Langworthy
NY • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Mann
KS • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Latta
OH • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Carter (GA)
GA • R
Sponsored 2/24/2025
Harris (MD)
MD • R
Sponsored 2/27/2025
Bost
IL • R
Sponsored 3/3/2025
Hudson
NC • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Shreve
IN • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Comer
KY • R
Sponsored 3/11/2025
Ogles
TN • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Walberg
MI • R
Sponsored 3/21/2025
Gooden
TX • R
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Bean (FL)
FL • R
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Hern (OK)
OK • R
Sponsored 3/24/2025
Cline
VA • R
Sponsored 3/31/2025
Williams (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 4/1/2025
Huizenga
MI • R
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Newhouse
WA • R
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Stefanik
NY • R
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Sessions
TX • R
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Wied
WI • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Owens
UT • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Steube
FL • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Fry
SC • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Donalds
FL • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Timmons
SC • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Wagner
MO • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Haridopolos
FL • R
Sponsored 5/5/2025
Hinson
IA • R
Sponsored 5/13/2025
Miller (WV)
WV • R
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Moolenaar
MI • R
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Nehls
TX • R
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Moore (UT)
UT • R
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Crenshaw
TX • R
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Harshbarger
TN • R
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Gill (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 6/9/2025
Fulcher
ID • R
Sponsored 6/10/2025
Valadao
CA • R
Sponsored 6/24/2025
Feenstra
IA • R
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Gimenez
FL • R
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Wilson (SC)
SC • R
Sponsored 7/16/2025
Evans (CO)
CO • R
Sponsored 8/26/2025
Rouzer
NC • R
Sponsored 8/29/2025
Burchett
TN • R
Sponsored 8/29/2025
Biggs (SC)
SC • R
Sponsored 9/2/2025
McDowell
NC • R
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Jackson (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Grothman
WI • R
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Goldman (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 9/15/2025
McGuire
VA • R
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Fischbach
MN • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Issa
CA • R
Sponsored 10/6/2025
Hamadeh (AZ)
AZ • R
Sponsored 11/20/2025
Simpson
ID • R
Sponsored 12/1/2025
Calvert
CA • R
Sponsored 12/4/2025
Allen
GA • R
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Jack
GA • R
Sponsored 1/7/2026
Joyce (OH)
OH • R
Sponsored 2/23/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.govRelated Bills
HR38 — Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR703 — Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
HRES719 — Honoring the life and legacy of Charles "Charlie" James Kirk.
Condemns political violence. The resolution condemns the assassination of Charles 'Charlie' James Kirk, honors his life and leadership, and urges swift justice while offering sympathy to his family.
HR425 — Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Ends the Corporate Transparency Act and removes its amendments from federal law. It also adjusts related U.S. Code citations and parts of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 to reflect that repeal. - Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act as title LXIV of division F of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) and removes all amendments made by that Act. - Edits Title 31, United States Code by removing or changing cross-references that mentioned section 5336 and updating references in sections 5321 and 5322. - Alters the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 by repealing section 6502 and striking or modifying portions of section 6509 as described in the bill.
HR452 — Miracle on Ice Congressional Gold Medal Act
This law awards Congressional Gold Medals to the 1980 U.S. Olympic Men's Ice Hockey Team as a formal recognition of their Lake Placid victory and its lasting effect on American morale and the sport of hockey. It directs the Treasury to strike the medals and sets rules for duplicates, display, and funding. - Team legacy and public recognition: The Act honors the 1980 team with a symbolic national award that reinforces their historical and cultural significance for fans, players, and communities connected to the game. - Museum displays and research access: One gold medal goes to the Lake Placid Olympic Center, one to the United States Hockey Hall of Fame Museum in Eveleth, Minnesota, and one to the United States Olympic & Paralympic Museum in Colorado Springs for display and research. - Mint operations and collectibles: The Secretary of the Treasury will strike the medals, may sell bronze duplicates at prices that cover costs, and classifies the medals as national and numismatic items. The U.S. Mint Public Enterprise Fund pays for production and receives proceeds from duplicate sales.
HR1301 — Death Tax Repeal Act
This bill would repeal the federal estate tax and the generation‑skipping transfer tax. It would also reshape gift tax rules by keeping tiered rates but creating a $10 million lifetime exemption indexed for inflation. - Heirs of people who die on or after enactment would not owe the federal estate tax. This removes that tax from those estates. - Donors and high‑net‑worth individuals would still face a gift tax, but under a tiered schedule from 18% to 35% and a $10 million lifetime exemption that is indexed for inflation after 2011. - Generation‑skipping transfers made on or after enactment would not be subject to the GST tax. Qualified domestic trusts for surviving spouses of decedents who died before enactment would follow transitional rules, including changed treatment of distributions after a 10‑year period beginning on the enactment date.
Take It Personal
Get Your Personalized Policy View
Create a free account to save research, track policy impacts, and unlock your personalized versions of these pages.
Already have an account? Sign in