DelawareSS 1 for SB 10153rd General Assembly (2024–2026)Senate

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 AND TITLE 29 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO MODIFICATION OF SENTENCES OF INCARCERATION.

Sponsored By: Bryan Townsend (Democratic)

Signed by Governor

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

7 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 5 mixed.

More legal help for sentence applicants

Sentence-change applicants have a right to a lawyer and access to needed Department of Correction records. They can hire a lawyer at their own expense or ask for an Office of Defense Services referral. Courts must make requested referrals unless they dismiss the application right away; self-representation follows court rules. Applications generally need the department's written statement, but the specified serious-medical-illness pathway is exempt. The Office of Defense Services must defend people without means at every stage after arrest, including custody and charging matters. It must pursue appeals or other remedies before or after conviction when authorized by law or deemed just by the Chief Defender.

Regular sentence reviews for Delaware prisoners

The law takes effect 180 days after enactment and shifts sentence-review initiation from the parole board to corrections officials. The Department of Correction must review eligibility and whether to recommend a sentence change at least every 2 years. It needs the person's consent to file; otherwise, it must give written reasons to the person and their lawyer or the Office of Defense Services. Eligible people can still apply after a negative recommendation, generally attaching those reasons. The department must adopt rules but cannot add eligibility barriers beyond the law. It must supply data for a public annual report, published online and sent to designated state officials by October 1. Reports cover eligibility decisions, applications, reasons for negative recommendations, releases, court outcomes, and demographic breakdowns.

Early release limits preserve sentence review

Courts can restrict early release for Level V sentences of 1 year or less, or sentences equal to the offense's statutory maximum. Restrictions can cover all or part of a sentence and block good time, furlough, work release, or supervised custody. These conditions cannot block the law's sentence-change review process. Applicants still need combined Level V sentences longer than 1 year to qualify for that review.

Medical parole expands with release conditions

Serious medical illness includes cognitive incapacity, permanent physical incapacity, severe illness, or terminal illness with an expected 18-month life expectancy. When corrections officials find medical good cause for release, they must recommend parole review; without a recommendation, prisoners can request review. The parole board can grant release regardless of time served after finding good cause and no substantial safety risk. The board can set conditions, revoke parole without a hearing, and return the person to prison. Courts can require medical-release plans covering treatment, care location, and payment sources, including commercial insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid eligibility.

More sentence review options for prisoners

People serving combined Level V prison sentences longer than 1 year have new ways to seek sentence changes. They can apply based only on serious medical illness or infirmity. Rehabilitation alone qualifies after 25 years served, or after 15 years for people age 60 or older. These specific pathways allow applications even during a mandatory prison term. Otherwise, people serving Title 11 violent-felony sentences must serve at least half their original Level V sentence. Other applicants serving mandatory terms must finish the mandatory portion first.

Program refusal no longer blocks review

Refusing required drug or alcohol treatment, education, or prison work no longer automatically blocks sentence-change applications or medical parole eligibility. Courts can still weigh refusal when deciding whether good cause and rehabilitation support a sentence change. Prison officials retain authority to impose discipline under their rules.

Sentence changes require safety checks

Courts can change eligible prisoners' sentences for good cause, including rehabilitation, serious illness, or prison overcrowding. They must review offense facts and find no substantial risk to the community, victims or witnesses, or the applicant. Rehabilitation reviews consider treatment, education, and work; medical reviews consider diagnosis, recovery prospects, prison care capacity, and continued imprisonment's effects on care. Victims and the Department of Justice get a reasonable chance to be heard before a sentence change is granted. After a denial for lack of good cause or substantial risk, courts can block repeat applications for up to 3 years. Medical applicants can reapply after at least 60 days by showing a material change in circumstances.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Bryan Townsend

    Democratic • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Stephanie T. Bolden

    Democratic • House

  • Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha

    Democratic • House

  • Franklin D. Cooke

    Democratic • House

  • Daniel Cruce

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mara Gorman

    Democratic • House

  • Kerri Evelyn Harris

    Democratic • House

  • Debra Heffernan

    Democratic • House

  • Kyra L. Hoffner

    Democratic • Senate

  • Kamela T Smith

    Democratic • House

  • Larry Lambert

    Democratic • House

  • S. Elizabeth Lockman

    Democratic • Senate

  • Melissa Minor-Brown

    Democratic • House

  • Eric Morrison

    Democratic • House

  • DeShanna U Neal

    Democratic • House

  • Josue O Ortega

    Democratic • House

  • Sophie Phillips

    Democratic • House

  • Marie Pinkney

    Democratic • Senate

  • Cyndie Romer

    Democratic • House

  • Melanie Ross Levin

    Democratic • House

  • Ray Seigfried

    Democratic • Senate

  • Claire Snyder-Hall

    Democratic • House

  • David P. Sokola

    Democratic • Senate

  • Laura V. Sturgeon

    Democratic • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 62 • No: 19

Senate vote • 6/30/2025

Passed (SM required)

Yes: 19 • No: 2

House vote • 6/26/2025

Passed (SM required)

Yes: 28 • No: 12

Senate vote • 5/22/2025

Passed (SM required)

Yes: 15 • No: 5

Actions Timeline

  1. Signed by Governor

    7/14/2025Governor
  2. Passed By Senate. Votes: 19 YES 2 NO

    6/30/2025Senate
  3. Passed By House. Votes: 28 YES 12 NO 1 VACANT

    6/26/2025House
  4. Amendment HA 3 to SS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

    6/26/2025House
  5. Amendment HA 2 to SS 1 - Stricken in House

    6/26/2025House
  6. Amendment HA 1 to SS 1 - Stricken in House

    6/26/2025House
  7. Reported Out of Committee (Appropriations) in House with 1 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits

    6/25/2025House
  8. Assigned to Appropriations Committee in House

    6/20/2025House
  9. Reported Out of Committee (Administration) in House with 3 On Its Merits

    6/18/2025House
  10. Assigned to Administration Committee in House

    6/5/2025House
  11. Passed By Senate. Votes: 15 YES 5 NO 1 ABSENT

    5/22/2025Senate
  12. was introduced and adopted in lieu of SB 10

    5/20/2025Senate

Bill Text

  • Current

    5/20/2025

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation