All Roll Calls
Yes: 581 • No: 229
Sponsored By: Sponsor information unavailable
Signed by Governor
Personalized for You
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
14 provisions identified: 13 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Hospitals must screen every emergency patient and give stabilizing treatment whenever the ER is open. Stabilizing care includes abortion when it is needed to treat the emergency. The Attorney General can sue to enforce this rule. Courts can fine a hospital up to $10,000 for each violation.
The Health Connector cannot share data for out‑of‑state or federal investigations into protected care unless federal law requires it. It cannot share identifiable health or personal data for any purpose not allowed by law. Anyone who gets Connector data may not use it to investigate or charge a patient. Providers and health plans can see identifiable data only for treatment, payment, operations, or the Connector’s exchange work.
Massachusetts courts do not change custody, parenting time, or restraining‑order findings based on another state’s ban on gender‑affirming care. The same bar applies to care‑and‑protection cases. Courts may act only if the parent’s conduct would be abuse, neglect, or maltreatment under Massachusetts law.
For certain prescriptions, providers or pharmacies may list the practice name on the label instead of the clinician’s name, when allowed by federal law. Pharmacy benefit managers cannot claw back money just because a clinician’s name is not on these labels. Medications used for reproductive or gender‑affirming care are left out of the prescription monitoring program unless the health department, after consulting practitioners, finds reporting is needed for public health. The program may not give out identifiable or detailed records for investigations into this care unless federal law requires it. These labeling and PBM rules take effect January 1, 2026.
The state health data center limits access to identifiable data to treatment, payment, and health operations. It may not answer out‑of‑state or federal requests about protected care unless federal law requires it. No one who gets center data may use it to investigate or charge a patient. The center can share de‑identified data for research and quality work, and identifiable data for research only with patient authorization or an IRB/privacy‑board waiver. Access authorized by the center is treated as compliant with state privacy law.
Boards cannot discipline you for providing or helping with reproductive or gender‑affirming care that is legal in Massachusetts, even if it happened in another state. Boards cannot deny your license for out‑of‑state criminal, civil, disciplinary, or malpractice actions tied to that care when the same care is lawful here. Boards also cannot post those out‑of‑state records on your public profile in that case.
Names, home addresses, personal emails, and phone numbers of people who provide, help, or promote reproductive or gender‑affirming care are not public records. The public health department may not collect or share individually identifiable or disaggregated abortion or gender‑affirming surveillance data, except when another law allows it. The law also expands who is covered from only family planning to anyone providing, facilitating, or promoting these services.
Liability insurers may not raise rates or change risk classes for nonprofit charities just because they offer or support reproductive or gender‑affirming care, or faced abusive litigation. Insurers may still set rates by general specialty risk.
Massachusetts does not remove or discipline a lawyer only for advising or representing clients on reproductive or gender‑affirming health care, even if that work is illegal in another state. The lawyer must still follow Massachusetts law and professional rules.
Except when federal law requires it, Massachusetts agencies and police do not help investigations into health care that is legal here. Civil service staff cannot be used to bypass these protections. Courts also may not treat protected care as proof of wrongdoing just because the patient was outside Massachusetts. An exception applies to tort or contract cases brought by the patient under Massachusetts law.
Companies that store reproductive, IVF, or gender‑affirming medical records must limit access to people the patient authorizes in writing. They must block sending or accessing these records from outside Massachusetts unless the patient gives written consent naming the recipients. Tech providers may not hand over data tied to protected care unless federal law requires it or the request includes a sworn statement that it is not for enforcing another state’s law. A false sworn statement can cost up to $50,000 per violation, and the Attorney General can sue to enforce. These business access‑control rules take effect no later than July 1, 2026.
The Department of Public Health creates one standard consent form that all licensed providers must use to share reproductive, IVF, and gender‑affirming health records. Breaking these rules counts as a violation of the state’s consumer‑protection law (chapter 93A). The Attorney General can sue, and courts can fine up to $5,000 per violation for unlawful storage or handling of this data.
The Attorney General can go to court to enforce the rule that state and local agencies must not help out‑of‑state or federal investigations into care that is legal in Massachusetts. The AG can seek court orders to make agencies follow this no‑cooperation rule.
The state center may charge application or other fees to non‑government groups that request access to identifiable health data. The law does not set the dollar amounts.
There is no primary sponsor on record.
Andrea Joy Campbell
Affiliation unavailable
Carmine Lawrence Gentile
Democratic • House
Cindy F. Friedman
Democratic • Senate
David M. Rogers
Democratic • House
Erika Uyterhoeven
Democratic • House
Jacob R. Oliveira
Democratic • Senate
Jason M. Lewis
Democratic • Senate
Joanne M. Comerford
Democratic • Senate
John Francis Moran
Democratic • House
Julian Cyr
Democratic • Senate
Pavel M. Payano
Democratic • Senate
Rebecca L. Rausch
Democratic • Senate
All Roll Calls
Yes: 581 • No: 229
House vote • 7/31/2025
House concurred in the Senate amendment
Yes: 132 • No: 24
House vote • 7/31/2025
Enacted
Yes: 132 • No: 24
House vote • 7/16/2025
Amendment 8 rejected
Yes: 30 • No: 129
House vote • 7/16/2025
Amendment 6 adopted, as changed
Yes: 130 • No: 29
House vote • 7/16/2025
Passed to be engrossed
Yes: 136 • No: 23
committee vote • 7/15/2025
Committee Favorable with Amendment: S.2543 “An Act strengthening health care protections in the Commonwealth” as amended
Yes: 21 • No: 0 • Other: 15
Signed by the Governor, Chapter 16 of the Acts of 2025
Laid before the Governor
Enacted -see Roll Call #68 (Yeas 37 to Nays 3)
Enacted - 132 YEAS to 24 NAYS (See YEA and NAY No. 72)
House concurred in the Senate amendment - 132 YEAS to 24 NAYS (See YEA and NAY No. 70)
Referred to the committee on Bills in the Third Reading
Senate concurred in the House amendment with a further amendment, see S2572
Rules suspended
Passed to be engrossed - 136 YEAS to 23 NAYS (See YEA and NAY No. 65)
Amended by substitution of a new text, see H4294
Amendment 9 adopted, as changed
Amendment 7 adopted, as changed
Amendment 6 adopted, as changed - 130 YEAS to 29 NAYS (See YEA and NAY No. 64)
Amendment 8 rejected - 30 YEAS to 129 NAYS (See YEA and NAY No. 63)
Amendment 4 rejected
Read third
Rules suspended
Ordered to a third reading
Read second, amended (as recommended by the committee on House Ways and Means)
Rules suspended
Committee reported that the matter be placed in the Orders of the Day for the next sitting with the amendment pending
Committee recommended ought to pass with an amendment, striking out all after the enacting clause and inserting the text of H4271, and referred to the committee on House Steering, Policy and Scheduling
Read; and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means
Rules suspended
Passed to be engrossed -see Roll Call #57 (Yeas 37 to Nays 3)
Chapter 16 of the Acts of 2025
8/7/2025
H 5350 — An Act modernizing the commonwealth’s cannabis laws
H 3213 — An Act relative to the assessment of local property taxes in the city of Springfield
H 4542 — An Act relative to making the charter of the city of Chicopee gender neutral
H 2988 — An Act authorizing Freddy Castaneda to take the civil service examination for the position of police officer in the city of Haverhill notwithstanding the maximum age requirement
H 2987 — An Act authorizing Brittany Sproule to take the civil service examination for the position of firefighter in the city of Haverhill notwithstanding the maximum age requirement
H 2985 — An Act authorizing Stephen Justice to take the civil service examination for the position of firefighter in the city of Haverhill notwithstanding the maximum age requirement