All Roll Calls
Yes: 171 • No: 2
Sponsored By: Regina T. Boyce (Democratic)
Signed by Governor
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
4 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 3 mixed.
Beginning October 1, 2026, Maryland sets location rules for new development areas in the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays Critical Areas. New intensely developed areas must be in limited development areas or contiguous and adjoining to existing intensely developed areas. New limited development areas must connect to existing limited or intensely developed areas. Areas with different land classifications count as adjacent when they share a boundary or are separated only by a road, right-of-way, or utility or access easement. In resource conservation areas, new development areas must stay at least 300 feet beyond tidal waters or wetlands. The Commission can approve alternatives that demonstrably improve water quality and habitat. Generally, no more than half of a county’s allocated expansion can be in resource conservation areas. An exception covers Calvert, Caroline, Cecil, Charles, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, St. Mary’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester counties. Their Commission-approved plans must show that part of the allocation cannot feasibly fit within or adjoining existing development areas. Developers must cluster development in these exception areas. Growth areas must minimize habitat impacts, maximize water-quality benefits, minimize harm to existing conservation-area uses, and appear on local comprehensive zoning maps. Development must avoid climate-vulnerable areas unless the local government proposes resiliency measures and the Commission approves them.
Beginning October 1, 2026, local authorities can approve Critical Area designation changes based on proof of a mapping mistake. The proposed classification must reflect land uses or natural features from the applicable reference date. Those dates are December 1, 1985, for the Chesapeake Bay and June 1, 2002, for the Atlantic Coastal Bays. For areas added through remapping, the relevant conditions are those that existed at the time of remapping. Corrections must follow State mapping rules, the local government’s documented original mapping method, the law’s goals, and Commission criteria. Approval is not automatic.
Beginning October 1, 2026, unlawful tree cutting in either coastal Critical Area can lead to lawsuits, orders to stop violations, replanting, and damages. The Commission chair or a local government can sue; local governments can also request referral to the Attorney General. At the local government’s or chair’s request, more qualified professionals can prepare, oversee, and approve completion of replanting plans. These include licensed foresters, licensed landscape architects, and other professionals approved by the Department of Natural Resources. When a circuit court assesses damages equal to estimated replanting costs, the violator pays the local government instead of the Department. The law changes who receives that payment, not the stated calculation of damages.
Beginning October 1, 2026, local governments must review their Critical Area programs every 10 years instead of every 6 years. The Commission gains explicit powers to adopt and amend regulations by affirmative vote, hold hearings, hire contractors, and set program standards. Local governments can submit program changes up to four times each calendar year. A proposal submitted as a refinement becomes an amendment if the chair takes no action within 30 days after Commission acceptance and no extension is approved. The Commission must notify the local government of that change. If the Commission overrides the chair’s refinement decision, it must act on the resulting amendment within 130 days of the vote, instead of 90 days.
Regina T. Boyce
Democratic • House
Marvin E. Holmes
Democratic • House
Robbyn Lewis
Democratic • House
Darrell Odom
Democratic • House
Dana Stein
Democratic • House
All Roll Calls
Yes: 171 • No: 2
Senate vote • 4/9/2026
Third Reading Passed
Yes: 41 • No: 0 • Other: 3
House vote • 3/12/2026
Third Reading Passed
Yes: 130 • No: 2 • Other: 4
Approved by the Governor - Chapter 274
Returned Passed
Third Reading Passed (41-0)
Second Reading Passed
Favorable Adopted
Favorable Report by Education, Energy, and the Environment
Referred Education, Energy, and the Environment
Third Reading Passed (130-2)
Second Reading Passed with Amendments
Favorable with Amendments {113220/1 Adopted
Favorable with Amendments Report by Environment and Transportation
Hearing 2/11 at 1:00 p.m.
First Reading Environment and Transportation
Pre-filed
Enacted
4/28/2026
Third Reading
3/10/2026
First Reading
1/14/2026
SB 0496, Maryland Medical Assistance Program - Coverage for the Treatment of Obesity - Authorization
SB 0366, Motor Vehicles - Intelligent Speed Assistance System Pilot Program - Establishment
SB 0244, Code Revision - Health - Maryland Medical Assistance Program
SB 0148, Income Tax - Credit for 9-1-1 Specialist Retirement Income (Supporting Our 9-1-1 Specialists Act)
SB 0016, Child Support - Earnings Withholdings Limits
HB 0529, Code Revision - Health - Maryland Medical Assistance Program