North DakotaSB 21742025 Regular SessionSenateWALLET

AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 11-33-02.1 and 58-03-11.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the regulation of odors in an animal feeding operation and zoning authority over animal feeding operations in counties and townships; and to provide an effective date.

Sponsored By: Paul J. Thomas (Republican)

Became Law

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

9 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 4 mixed.

60-day zoning answer, 3-year build clock

You can ask a county or township for a written zoning decision for an animal feeding operation. If it does not validly object within 60 days, your project is deemed in compliance. To keep that protection, you must promptly apply to the state DEQ, get a final permit, finish any permit appeals, and start construction within three years of the final permit. These timing rules stay in effect during appeals.

Grandfather protection for existing animal operations

If your animal feeding operation existed before a new county or township rule, and that rule would cause big economic harm, the rule does not apply to you. Local boards must declare that new rule ineffective for your preexisting operation.

Local boards can't block farms or AFOs

The law stops counties and townships from banning farming or ranching, or the normal things that go with it. They cannot block new animal feeding operations. They also cannot forbid reasonable growth or diversification of an existing farm or ranch.

Strict limits on local rules, $500 fee cap

Counties and townships can only regulate AFOs as this law allows. They cannot add water quality, closure, site security, lagoon, or nutrient plan requirements. All local fees tied to an AFO permit or petition are capped at $500 total. No local permit is required for improvements that keep you in compliance or do not push animal numbers beyond setback limits.

State setbacks and odor limits for AFOs

If a county or township does not regulate AFO siting, the state sets minimum setbacks by size and species. Examples: under 300 animal units—no minimum; 300–1,000—0.25 miles; 1,001–3,500—hogs 0.75 miles, others 0.5 miles; 2,001–5,000—hogs 1.0 mile, others 0.75 miles; 3,501–7,500—hogs 1.5 miles, others 0.75 miles; 7,501–10,000—1.0 mile; 10,001–17,500—1.25 miles; 17,501–25,000—1.5 miles; 25,001+—1.75 miles. Counties and townships cannot exceed the state setback limits. They may adjust setbacks using the state odor footprint tool, but the annoyance‑free percent cannot be above 94%.

Clear definition of animal feeding operation

The law defines an animal feeding operation. Animals are confined and fed for at least 45 days in 12 months, and crops are not sustained on part of the lot. Aquatic animals are excluded. These definitions guide which sites must follow AFO zoning rules.

High- and low-density farm zones

Counties and townships can create high‑density farm zones with smaller setbacks. They can also create low‑density zones with larger setbacks around homes, recreation, or non‑ag commercial areas. County low‑density zones may extend up to 1.5 miles; township low‑density zones may extend up to 0.5 miles.

Rules can vary by size and species

Counties and townships may set different location standards based on farm size and the animals raised. This can ease siting for some operations and tighten it for others, depending on category and species.

Winner gets attorney fees in AFO suits

In lawsuits over county or township AFO rules, courts must award the winning side their actual attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. This shifts legal cost risk to the losing party.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Paul J. Thomas

    Republican • Senate

Cosponsors

  • Mike Beltz

    Republican • House

  • Dori Hauck

    Republican • House

  • Cole Conley

    Republican • Senate

  • Randy D. Lemm

    Republican • Senate

  • Kent Weston

    Republican • Senate

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 108 • No: 30

House vote 3/25/2025

Second reading, passed, yeas 66 nays 25

Yes: 66 • No: 25

Senate vote 2/19/2025

Second reading, passed, yeas 42 nays 5

Yes: 42 • No: 5

Actions Timeline

  1. Filed with Secretary Of State 04/03

    4/4/2025House
  2. Signed by Governor 04/02

    4/3/2025Senate
  3. Sent to Governor

    3/31/2025Senate
  4. Signed by President

    3/31/2025Senate
  5. Signed by Speaker

    3/31/2025House
  6. Returned to Senate

    3/26/2025Senate
  7. Second reading, passed, yeas 66 nays 25

    3/25/2025House
  8. Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 9 5 0

    3/20/2025House
  9. Committee Hearing 10:15

    3/7/2025House
  10. Introduced, first reading, referred Agriculture Committee

    2/21/2025House
  11. Received from Senate

    2/20/2025House
  12. Second reading, passed, yeas 42 nays 5

    2/19/2025Senate
  13. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

    2/17/2025Senate
  14. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 5 1 0

    2/14/2025Senate
  15. Rereferred to Agriculture and Veterans Affairs

    2/3/2025Senate
  16. Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 6 0 0

    1/30/2025Senate
  17. Committee Hearing 10:30

    1/23/2025Senate
  18. Introduced, first reading, referred Agriculture and Veterans Affairs Committee

    1/13/2025Senate

Bill Text

  • Enrollment

  • FIRST ENGROSSMENT

  • INTRODUCED

  • Prepared by the Legislative Council staff for Senator Luick

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation