OklahomaHB 3298Oklahoma 2026 Regular SessionHouse

Civil procedure; Uniform Judicial Interview of Children Act; terms; scope; judicial officer; judicial interview; considerations; training; procedure; record; codification; effective date.

Sponsored By: Aletia Timmons (Democratic)

Signed by Governor

Senate Committee

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 2 mixed.

Privacy and access to interview records

Beginning 2026-11-01, if a judge interviews a child, a record must be made. On appeal, a party can get the record after requesting it and paying required costs, unless an approved waiver blocks access. All parties may agree on the record to give up access, but a judge approves only if each party clearly waives access, notice of child communications, and the right to respond; unless the stipulation says otherwise, it also blocks access later, including appeals. The judge sets limits on what nonparties can see during and after the case. The court seals the record from the public if it makes the finding required by Section 24A.29 of Title 51. Other state law decides whether the child, the child’s lawyer, and the guardian ad litem can access the record and whether the child may testify.

Rules for judges interviewing children

Beginning 2026-11-01, a judge may interview a child only if it is in the child’s best interest and allowed by law. The judge weighs the child’s views, age and maturity, likely help or harm, and other options. Judges who conduct these interviews must have training. The child, the child’s lawyer, the guardian ad litem, or a party may ask for an interview, and the judge may start one, unless another law bars it. Before the interview, the judge must tell the child, in plain terms, that the child does not have to answer, a record will be made, who may listen, if it may be shared, and that the judge decides the case. The child’s lawyer and guardian ad litem may attend; parties and their lawyers cannot. Parties, the child’s lawyer, and the guardian ad litem can propose questions on the record, but the judge chooses which to ask. If the child makes a contested, case-deciding factual claim, the judge must tell the parties and let them offer evidence and arguments before a final decision. The law applies only to judicial-officer interviews in covered proceedings and excludes interviews under the Children’s Code or Juvenile Code, child testimony, and interviews by non-judges.

Courts keep rules consistent across states

Beginning 2026-11-01, courts apply this law with an eye to keeping it uniform with other states that enacted the same Act. This helps make rulings more predictable across states in covered proceedings.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsor

  • Aletia Timmons

    Democratic • House

Cosponsors

  • Mary B. Boren

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mickey Dollens

    Democratic • House

  • Michelle McCane

    Democratic • House

  • Annie Menz

    Democratic • House

  • Nikki Nice

    Democratic • Senate

  • Mike Osburn

    Republican • House

  • Dave Rader

    Republican • Senate

  • Suzanne Schreiber

    Democratic • House

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 370 • No: 4

House vote • 5/6/2026

FOURTH READING

Yes: 85 • No: 4

Senate vote • 4/29/2026

THIRD READING

Yes: 46 • No: 0

Senate vote • 4/14/2026

Committee vote: Judiciary

Yes: 7 • No: 0

Senate vote • 4/14/2026

Top_of_Page

Yes: 0 • No: 0

House vote • 3/24/2026

Top_of_Page

Yes: 95 • No: 0

House vote • 3/24/2026

THIRD READING

Yes: 95 • No: 0

House vote • 2/26/2026

DO PASS

Yes: 13 • No: 0

House vote • 2/26/2026

DO PASS

Yes: 13 • No: 0

House vote • 2/19/2026

DO PASS

Yes: 8 • No: 0

House vote • 2/19/2026

DO PASS

Yes: 8 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Approved by Governor 05/12/2026

    5/12/2026House
  2. Sent to Governor

    5/6/2026House
  3. Enrolled measure signed, returned to House

    5/6/2026Senate
  4. Enrolled, signed, to Senate

    5/6/2026House
  5. Referred for enrollment

    5/6/2026House
  6. Fourth Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 85 Nays: 4

    5/6/2026House
  7. SA's read, adopted

    5/6/2026House
  8. SA's received

    4/29/2026House
  9. Engrossed to House

    4/29/2026Senate
  10. Referred for engrossment

    4/29/2026Senate
  11. Coauthored by Senator Nice

    4/29/2026Senate
  12. Measure passed: Ayes: 46 Nays: 0

    4/29/2026Senate
  13. General Order, Considered

    4/29/2026Senate
  14. Coauthored by Representative Dollens

    4/16/2026Senate
  15. Placed on General Order

    4/16/2026Senate
  16. Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Judiciary committee; CR filed

    4/14/2026Senate
  17. Coauthored by Representative Menz

    4/1/2026Senate
  18. Second Reading referred to Judiciary

    4/1/2026Senate
  19. First Reading

    3/25/2026Senate
  20. Engrossed, signed, to Senate

    3/25/2026House
  21. Referred for engrossment

    3/24/2026House
  22. Third Reading, Measure passed: Ayes: 95 Nays: 0

    3/24/2026House
  23. Coauthored by Senator(s) Boren

    3/24/2026House
  24. Remove Senator Boren as principal Senate author and substitute with Senator Rader

    3/24/2026House
  25. Coauthored by Representative(s) Schreiber, Osburn, McCane

    3/24/2026House

Bill Text

  • Enrolled (final version)

    5/6/2026

  • Amended And Engrossed

    4/29/2026

  • Floor (Senate)

    4/15/2026

  • Senate Committee Substitute for House Bill

    4/15/2026

  • Senate Committee Report

    4/14/2026

  • Engrossed

    3/24/2026

  • Floor (House)

    3/2/2026

  • House Committee Report

    2/26/2026

  • House Policy Committee Report

    2/19/2026

  • Introduced

    1/14/2026

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation