TexasHB 350589th Legislature Regular SessionHouse

Relating to the continuation and operation of a health care provider participation district created by certain local governments to administer a health care provider participation program.

Sponsored By: Cody Harris, Bryan Hughes (Republican)

Became Law

City Government--GeneralCounty Government--GeneralHealth Care ProvidersOpen MeetingsSpecial Districts & Authorities--HospitalState Finances--Management & ControlMEDICAIDHEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 4 mixed.

Patients protected from hospital payment surcharges

Hospitals paying into these district programs cannot add the required payment to a patient's bill as a surcharge. This protects patients from being charged that payment directly.

Closing hospital districts divides money and debts

Creating local governments must adopt identical orders to dissolve a district. The board then manages its property and assets and pays or settles its debts. Remaining provider-fund money goes back to institutional health care providers in proportion to their payments. Creating local governments share any debt shortfall based on their contributions. They also receive other unused money in those same proportions.

Hospital Medicaid funding gets use limits

Districts must keep hospital payments and related receipts in a separate fund, including remaining money from the old program. The fund supports state transfers that draw federal matching money for nonpublic hospitals. Approved payments include uncompensated care, uniform managed-care rate increases, similar waiver payments, and other federally matched reimbursements. Other allowed uses are capped program costs, refunds of payments collected by mistake, and proportional hospital refunds of unusable state-returned money. Districts can collect only what is reasonably needed for approved uses, and only while a listed funding option is available. Money resulting from these transfers cannot fund Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion; this does not itself change who qualifies for Medicaid. Boards can replace rules that block federal matching, but cannot add or materially expand district or provider liability. Texas health officials can reject fund money when accepting it may violate federal law.

Local hospital districts continue with oversight

Qualifying districts can continue their hospital funding programs when their prior authority expires. Each creating local government must approve identical orders, and the district board must ratify them. Eligible governments are counties with more than 80,000 but fewer than 90,000 people bordering the Trinity River; counties with more than 45,000 but fewer than 55,000 people bordering Oklahoma; or hospital districts in counties with more than 30,000 people containing part of Jim Chapman Lake. With three or more governments, each appoints one director. With two, the more populous government appoints two directors and the other appoints one. Directors serve staggered two-year terms, must live in the appointing jurisdiction, and cannot be district employees. Directors serve without pay but can receive actual expense reimbursements. Districts must hold public hearings at least yearly on proposed payments and spending, with notice to hospitals and the public. Hospitals must submit required financial and use data, and districts must report collections, spending, and administrative contracts to state health officials. Districts cannot issue bonds.

Required hospital payments have firm caps

Covered nonpublic hospitals must make annual payments based on net patient revenue, with assessments no more often than quarterly. Payments must use a uniform share of revenue and be updated yearly. First-year amounts use the latest reported state data, or Medicare cost reports when required state data is missing. Total payments cannot exceed 6% of all paying hospitals' combined net patient revenue. Payments must cover approved transfers and administration, but administrative use is capped at $150,000 yearly plus actual deposit-security costs. Hospitals cannot be charged under both the old and new district programs for the same period. Collection fees cannot exceed usual charges for similar work; fees collected by district officials go to the district's general fund. Late-payment interest and penalties cannot exceed the limits for other overdue payments owed to the creating local governments.

Sponsors & Cosponsors

Sponsors

  • Cody Harris

    House

  • Bryan Hughes

    Republican • Senate

Cosponsors

There are no cosponsors for this bill.

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 133 • No: 29

Senate vote • 5/25/2025

Record vote

Yes: 0 • No: 0

Senate vote • 5/25/2025

Record vote

Yes: 0 • No: 0

House vote • 5/6/2025

Record vote

Yes: 118 • No: 28

House vote • Unknown

Committee vote: Intergovernmental Affairs

Yes: 8 • No: 1

Senate vote • Unknown

Committee vote: Local Government

Yes: 7 • No: 0

Actions Timeline

  1. Effective immediately

    6/20/2025House
  2. Filed without the Governor's signature

    6/20/2025House
  3. Sent to the Governor

    5/28/2025House
  4. Signed in the Senate

    5/27/2025Senate
  5. Signed in the House

    5/27/2025House
  6. Reported enrolled

    5/26/2025House
  7. Senate passage reported

    5/25/2025House
  8. Record vote

    5/25/2025Senate
  9. Passed

    5/25/2025Senate
  10. Read 3rd time

    5/25/2025Senate
  11. Record vote

    5/25/2025Senate
  12. Three day rule suspended

    5/25/2025Senate
  13. Vote recorded in Journal

    5/25/2025Senate
  14. Read 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading

    5/25/2025Senate
  15. Laid before the Senate

    5/25/2025Senate
  16. Placed on local & uncontested calendar

    5/25/2025Senate
  17. Committee report printed and distributed

    5/16/2025Senate
  18. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar

    5/16/2025Senate
  19. Reported favorably w/o amendments

    5/16/2025Senate
  20. Vote taken in committee

    5/15/2025Senate
  21. Considered in public hearing

    5/15/2025Senate
  22. Left pending in committee

    5/12/2025Senate
  23. Considered in public hearing

    5/12/2025Senate
  24. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .

    5/12/2025Senate
  25. Referred to Local Government

    5/7/2025Senate

Bill Text

Related Bills

Back to State Legislation