149 sections in this chapter.
ORS 136.612 Hearing; security amount; vacation or modification of order. (1) At the hearing to determine whether a material witness order should be entered
2.4K chars
(a) The applicant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence all facts essential to support the order; (b) The prospective witness may testify and may call witnesses; (c) All testimony is under oath; and (d) The Oregon Evidence Code shall apply in any material w…
ORS 136.613 [Formerly 139.170; 1977 c.746 §11; repealed by 1995 c.657 §18]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.614 Witness held in detention facility; payment. A witness held in a county jail, or other appropriate detention facility, as the result of a material witness order must be paid $7.50 for each day of confinement. The county shall pay the fee upon the release of the witness from custody or, in the discretion of the court, at designated times or intervals during the confinement. [1995 c.657 §17]
0.0K chars
Note: See note under 136.608.
ORS 136.615 [Formerly 139.180; repealed by 1995 c.657 §18]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.616 Deposition to perpetuate testimony; procedure. (1) As used in this section, “material witness order” has the meaning given that term in ORS 136.608
1.8K chars
(2) At any time after the court enters a material witness order, the court may order, or the district attorney or the defendant may file a petition to conduct, a deposition to perpetuate the testimony of the material witness. (3)(a) The petition must be in writing and sworn to by…
ORS 136.617 Motion to compel witness who may be incriminated to testify. In any criminal proceeding before a court of record or in any proceeding before a grand jury, or in any proceeding before a court of record under ORS 646.760, or in any proceeding for the imposition of remedial or punitive sanction for contempt, if a witness refuses to testify or produce evidence of any kind on the ground that the witness may be incriminated thereby, the prosecuting attorney may move the court to order the witness to testify or produce evidence. The court shall forthwith hold a summary hearing at which the prosecuting attorney shall show reasonable cause to believe the witness possesses knowledge relevant to the proceeding, or that no privilege protects the evidence sought to be produced. The witness may show cause why the witness should not be compelled to testify or produce evidence. The court shall order the witness to testify regarding the subject matter under inquiry upon such showing of reasonable cause or shall order the production of evidence upon a finding that no privilege protects the evidence sought, unless the court finds that to do so would be clearly contrary to the public interest. The court shall hold the summary hearing outside the presence of the jury and the public and may require the prosecuting attorney to disclose the purpose of the testimony or evidence. The witness shall be entitled to be represented by counsel at the summary hearing. [Formerly 139.190; 1975 c.255 §14; 1981 c.882 §1; 1991 c.724 §25a]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.619 Immunity of witness compelled to testify. (1) A witness who, in compliance with a court order issued under ORS 33.085 or 136.617, testifies or produces evidence that the witness would have been privileged to withhold but for the court order, may be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for any matter about which the witness testified or produced evidence unless the prosecution, penalty or forfeiture is prohibited by section 12, Article I of the Oregon Constitution. The testimony of the witness or evidence produced or information derived from the testimony or evidence may not be used against the witness in any criminal prosecution. However, the witness may nevertheless be prosecuted or subjected to penalty for any perjury, false swearing or contempt committed in answering, or failing to answer, or in producing, or failing to produce, evidence in accordance with the order. If a person refuses to testify after being ordered to testify as provided in this section, the person shall be subject to penalty for contempt of court for failure to comply with the order
0.5K chars
(2) Subsection (1) of this section shall not prevent the use of post-judgment collection procedures, including but not limited to wage withholding, income withholding, benefit withholding, assignment, garnishment or execution, based on matters about which a defendant testifies or…
ORS 136.620 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §242; renumbered 136.455]
0.1K chars
(Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses From Without a State in Criminal Proceedings)
ORS 136.623 Definitions. (1) “Witness,” as used in ORS 136.623 to 136.637, shall include a person whose testimony is desired in any proceeding or investigation by a grand jury or in a criminal action, prosecution or proceeding
0.2K chars
(2) The word “state” shall include any territory of the United States and District of Columbia. (3) The word “summons” shall include a subpoena, order or other notice requiring the appearance of a witness. [Formerly 139.210]
ORS 136.625 Where witness material to proceeding in another state is in this state. (1) If a judge of a court of record in any state which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within that state to attend and testify in this state certifies under the seal of such court that there is a criminal prosecution pending in such court, or that a grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence, that a person being within this state is a material witness in such prosecution, or grand jury investigation, and that the presence of the person will be required for a specified number of days, upon presentation of such certificate to any judge of a court of record in the county in which such person is, such judge shall fix a time and place for a hearing, and shall make an order directing the witness to appear at a time and place certain for the hearing
2.3K chars
(2) If at a hearing the judge determines that the witness is material and necessary, that it will not cause undue hardship to the witness to be compelled to attend and testify in the prosecution or a grand jury investigation in the other state, and that the laws of the state in w…
ORS 136.627 Where witness material to proceeding in this state is in another state. (1) If a person in any state, which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within its borders to attend and testify in criminal prosecutions, or grand jury investigations commenced or about to commence, in this state, is a material witness in a prosecution pending in a court of record in this state, or in a grand jury investigation which has commenced or is about to commence, a judge of such court may issue a certificate under the seal of the county stating these facts and specifying the number of days the witness will be required. Said certificate may include a recommendation that the witness be taken into immediate custody and delivered to an officer of this state to assure the attendance of the witness in this state. This certificate shall be presented to a judge of a court of record in the county in which the witness is found
0.8K chars
(2) If the witness is summoned to attend and testify in this state the witness shall be tendered the sum of 10 cents a mile for each mile by the ordinary traveled route to and from the court where the prosecution is pending and $5 for each day that the witness is required to trav…
ORS 136.630 [Repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.633 Immunity of witness from arrest or service of process. (1) If a person comes into this state in obedience to a summons directing the person to attend and testify in this state the person shall not while in this state pursuant to such summons be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before the entrance of the person into this state under the summons
0.4K chars
(2) If a person passes through this state while going to another state in obedience to a summons to attend and testify in that state or while returning therefrom, the person shall not while so passing through this state be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or cri…
ORS 136.635 Construction of ORS 136.623 to 136.637. ORS 136.623 to 136.637 shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law of the states which enact the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings. [Formerly 139.250]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.637 Short title. ORS 136.623 to 136.637 may be cited as Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings. [Formerly 139.260]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.640 [Repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]
0.0K chars
(Competency)
ORS 136.643 Defendant as witness. In the trial of or examination upon any indictment, complaint, information or other proceeding before any court, magistrate, jury or other tribunal against a person accused or charged with the commission of a crime, the person so charged or accused shall, at the own request of the person, but not otherwise, be deemed a competent witness, the credit to be given to the testimony of the person being left solely to the jury, under the instructions of the court, or to the discrimination of the magistrate, grand jury or other tribunal before which such testimony is given. The waiver of the person of this right creates no presumption against the person. The defendant or accused, when offering testimony as a witness in the own behalf of the defendant, gives the prosecution a right to cross-examination upon all facts to which the defendant or accused has testified and which tend to the conviction or acquittal of the defendant or accused. [Formerly 139.310]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.645 Codefendant as witness. No person named in an indictment, information or complaint as a codefendant shall be deemed incompetent to testify as a witness at the trial of another defendant solely because the person is so named. [Formerly 139.315]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.650 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §243; renumbered 136.460]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.655 Spouse as witness. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, in all criminal actions in which a spouse in a marriage is the party accused, the other spouse is a competent witness, but neither spouse shall be compelled or allowed to testify in a criminal action, except as provided in ORS 40.255
0.5K chars
(2) There is no privilege under this section, or under ORS 40.255 in all criminal actions in which a spouse is charged with bigamy or with an offense or attempted offense against the person or property of the other spouse or of a child of either, or with an offense against the pe…
ORS 136.660 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §244; renumbered 136.465]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.670 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §245; renumbered 136.470]
0.0K chars
(Hypnotized Witnesses)
ORS 136.675 Conditions for use of testimony of persons subjected to hypnosis. If either prosecution or defense in any criminal proceeding in the State of Oregon intends to offer the testimony of any person, including the defendant, who has been subjected to hypnosis, mesmerism or any other form of the exertion of will power or the power of suggestion which is intended to or results in a state of trance, sleep or entire or partial unconsciousness relating to the subject matter of the proposed testimony, performed by any person, it shall be a condition of the use of such testimony that the entire procedure be recorded either on videotape or any mechanical recording device. The unabridged videotape or mechanical recording shall be made available to the other party or parties in accordance with ORS 135.805 to 135.873. [1977 c.540 §1; 1983 c.740 §15]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.680 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §246; renumbered 136.475]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.685 Required explanations by law enforcement personnel to hypnosis subject; consent of subject required. (1) No person employed or engaged in any capacity by or on behalf of any state or local law enforcement agency shall use upon another person any form of hypnotism, mesmerism or any other form of the exertion of will power or the power of suggestion which is intended to or results in a state of trance, sleep or entire or partial unconsciousness without first explaining to the intended subject that
0.8K chars
(a) The intended subject is free to refuse to be subject to the processes delineated in this section; (b) There is a risk of psychological side effects resulting from the process; (c) If the intended subject agrees to be subject to such processes, it is possible that the process …
ORS 136.690 [Renumbered 136.480]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.695 Evidence obtained in violation of ORS 136.675 or 136.685 inadmissible. No evidence secured in violation of ORS 136.675 or 136.685 shall be admissible in any criminal proceeding in this state. [1977 c.540 §3]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.700 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §247; renumbered 136.485]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.710 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §248; renumbered 136.490]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.720 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §249; renumbered 136.495]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.730 [Repealed by 1971 c.743 §432]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.750 [1993 c.379 §1; renumbered 153.805 in 1995]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.753 [1993 c.379 §2; renumbered 153.808 in 1995]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.756 [1993 c.379 §3; renumbered 153.810 in 1995]
0.1K chars
PROCEDURE TO RELY ON ENHANCEMENT FACT AT SENTENCING
ORS 136.760 Definitions for ORS 136.765 to 136.785
0.5K chars
As used in ORS 136.765 to 136.785: (1) “Accusatory instrument” has the meaning given that term in ORS 131.005. (2) “Enhancement fact” means a fact that is constitutionally required to be found by a jury in order to increase the sentence that may be imposed upon conviction of a cr…
ORS 136.765 Notice to defendant. In order to rely on an enhancement fact to increase the sentence that may be imposed in a criminal proceeding, the state shall notify the defendant of its intention to rely on the enhancement fact by
0.7K chars
(1) Pleading the enhancement fact in the accusatory instrument; or (2) Providing written notice to the defendant of the enhancement fact, and the state’s intention to rely on it, no later than 60 days after the defendant is arraigned on an indictment, waives indictment or is held…
ORS 136.770 Enhancement fact related to offense. (1) When an enhancement fact relates to an offense charged in the accusatory instrument, the court shall submit the enhancement fact to the jury during the trial phase of the criminal proceeding unless the defendant
1.4K chars
(a) Defers trial of the enhancement fact under subsection (4) of this section; or (b) Makes a written waiver of the right to a jury trial on the enhancement fact and: (A) Admits to the enhancement fact; or (B) Elects to have the enhancement fact tried to the court. (2) If the def…
ORS 136.773 Enhancement fact related to defendant. (1) When an enhancement fact relates to the defendant, the court shall submit the enhancement fact to the jury during the sentencing phase of the criminal proceeding if the defendant is found guilty of an offense to which the enhancement fact applies unless the defendant makes a written waiver of the right to a jury trial on the enhancement fact and
1.6K chars
(a) Admits to the enhancement fact; or (b) Elects to have the enhancement fact tried to the court. (2) If the defendant makes the election under subsection (1)(b) of this section and is found guilty during the trial phase of the criminal proceeding, the enhancement fact shall be …
ORS 136.776 Effect of waiver of right to jury trial. When a defendant waives the right to a jury trial on the issue of guilt or innocence, the waiver constitutes a written waiver of the right to a jury trial on all enhancement facts whether related to the offense or the defendant. [2005 c.463 §5]
0.0K chars
Note: See note under 136.765.
ORS 136.780 Evidence. All evidence received during the trial phase of a criminal proceeding may be considered by the jury or, if the defendant waives the right to a jury trial, by the court during the sentencing phase of the proceeding. [2005 c.463 §6]
0.0K chars
Note: See note under 136.765.
ORS 136.785 Burden of proof; effect of finding. (1) When an enhancement fact is tried to a jury, any question relating to the enhancement fact shall be submitted to the jury
1.2K chars
(2) The state has the burden of proving an enhancement fact beyond a reasonable doubt. (3) An enhancement fact that is tried to a jury is not proven unless: (a) The number of jurors who find that the state has met its burden of proof with regard to the enhancement fact is equal t…
ORS 136.790 Notice to defendant upon remand. In order to rely on an enhancement fact, as defined in ORS 136.760, to increase the sentence that may be imposed upon remand of a case described in section 21 (3), chapter 463, Oregon Laws 2005, the state, within a reasonable time before resentencing, shall notify the defendant of its intention to rely on the enhancement fact by providing written notice to the defendant of the enhancement fact and the state’s intention to rely on it. [2005 c.463 §22]
0.2K chars
Note: 136.790 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 136 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
ORS 136.792 Jury upon remand. (1) For the purpose of imposing a new sentence in a case that has been remanded to a trial court that will result in resentencing for which a new sentence has not been imposed prior to July 7, 2005, the court may impanel a new jury to determine the enhancement facts as defined in ORS 136.760. Laws relating to impaneling a jury for a criminal trial apply to impaneling a jury under this section
0.7K chars
(2) ORS 136.785 (3) does not apply to a case in which the court has impaneled a new jury under this section. In a case with a jury impaneled under this section, an enhancement fact is not proven unless the number of jurors who find that the state has met its burden of proof with …
ORS 136.810 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §250; renumbered 136.500]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.820 [Renumbered 136.505]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.830 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §251; renumbered 136.515]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.840 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §252; renumbered 136.525]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.850 [Repealed by 1971 c.565 §17 (136.851 enacted in lieu of 136.850)]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 136.851 [1971 c.565 §18 (136.851 enacted in lieu of 136.850); 1973 c.836 §253; renumbered 136.535]
0.0K chars
_______________