85 sections in this chapter.
ORS 423.450 Contempt proceedings against person interfering with ombudsman. If any person willfully obstructs or hinders the proper and lawful exercise of the Corrections Ombudsman’s powers, or willfully misleads or attempts to mislead the Corrections Ombudsman in inquiries under ORS 423.400 to 423.450, the judge of the Circuit Court for Marion County, on application of the ombudsman, shall compel obedience by proceedings for contempt as in the case of disobedience of the requirements of a subpoena issued from such court or a refusal to testify therein. [1977 c.378 §11]
0.0K chars
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
ORS 423.475 Findings. The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that
1.3K chars
(1) Passage by the voters of chapter 2, Oregon Laws 1995, has created mandatory minimum penalties for certain violent offenses, and the probable effect thereof will be a significant increase in the demands placed on state secure facilities. (2) These demands are a shared responsi…
ORS 423.478 Duties of department and counties; authority of county supervisory authority. (1) The Department of Corrections shall
4.8K chars
(a) Operate prisons for offenders sentenced to terms of incarceration for more than 12 months; (b) Provide central information and data services sufficient to: (A) Allow tracking of offenders; and (B) Permit analysis of correlations between sanctions, supervision, services and pr…
ORS 423.480 Adoption of supervision rules. The Department of Corrections, in consultation with county community corrections agencies, community members, including persons currently or formerly under supervision, and organizations that provide culturally specific services, shall adopt rules for standards concerning the location of supervision visits, the frequency of visits and the manner of reporting, for persons on supervision. The rules must take into account evidence-based practices and must require consideration of the risks, needs and responsivity of each supervised person and the goals for completion of supervision. The rules must include a reporting process that is designed to minimize disruptions to the life of the supervised person and avoid unnecessary hardships, while offering the supervised person a broad array of reporting options, and that is focused on the success of the person on supervision. [2022 c.78 §12]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.483 Baseline funding; basis on which county can discontinue participation. (1)(a) The baseline funding for biennia beginning after June 30, 1999, is the current service level for the expenses of providing management, support services, supervision and sanctions for offenders described in ORS 423.478 (2). At a minimum, each biennium’s appropriation must be established at this baseline
1.7K chars
(b) The baseline funding described in paragraph (a) of this subsection may not be decreased as a result of a reduction under ORS 137.633. (2) If the total state community corrections appropriation is less than the baseline calculated under subsection (1) of this section, a county…
ORS 423.486 Costs incurred by county; rules. (1) Beginning in 2012, and every six years thereafter, the Department of Corrections shall conduct a study to determine the actual costs incurred by each county of providing management, support services, supervision and sanctions for offenders described in ORS 423.478 (2)
0.1K chars
(2) The department may adopt rules to carry out the provisions of this section. [2009 c.168 §1]
ORS 423.490 Department reimbursement of counties for costs incurred pursuant to ORS 813.011; rules. (1) The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that
1.5K chars
(a) In November of 2010, the voters enacted ORS 813.011, which directed the state to fully reimburse counties for the costs of incarcerating persons sentenced under ORS 813.011, including the costs of pretrial incarceration. (b) Different counties incur different costs of incarce…
ORS 423.497 National criminal history check. (1) During the intake process, each county shall conduct a national criminal history check on every person incarcerated in the county correctional facility
0.3K chars
(2) The county shall develop policies and procedures to ensure that the results of the national criminal history check are received before an adult in custody is released. (3) The state shall reimburse each county for the costs of conducting the national criminal history checks. …
ORS 423.500 Definitions for ORS 423.500 to 423.560. As used in ORS 423.500 to 423.560, unless the context requires otherwise
0.3K chars
(1) “Director” means the Director of the Department of Corrections. (2) “Department” means the Department of Corrections. (3) “Plan” means the biennial community corrections plan required by ORS 423.535. [1977 c.412 §1a; 1979 c.160 §2; 1987 c.320 §220; 1995 c.423 §1a]
ORS 423.505 Legislative policy on program funding. Because counties are in the best position for the management, oversight and administration of local criminal justice matters and for determining local resource priorities, it is declared to be the legislative policy of this state to establish an ongoing partnership between the state and counties and to finance with appropriations from the General Fund statewide community correction programs on a continuing basis. The intended purposes of this program are to
0.8K chars
(1) Provide appropriate sentencing and sanctioning options including incarceration, community supervision and services; (2) Provide improved local services for persons charged with criminal offenses with the goal of reducing the occurrence of repeat criminal offenses; (3) Promote…
ORS 423.510 [1977 c.412 §2; 1985 c.44 §3; 1985 c.558 §7; repealed by 1995 c.423 §31]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.515 [1977 c.412 §4; 1987 c.320 §220a; repealed by 1995 c.423 §31]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.520 Financial grants to counties for community corrections programs. The Department of Corrections shall make grants to assist counties in the implementation and operation of community corrections programs including, but not limited to, preventive or diversionary correctional programs, probation, parole, work release and local correctional facilities and programs for offenders. The department shall require recipients of the grants to cooperate, to the extent of available information systems resources, in the collection and sharing of data necessary to evaluate the effect of community corrections programs on future criminal conduct. [1977 c.412 §5; 1987 c.320 §221; 1995 c.423 §3; 1997 c.433 §10]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.523 [2013 c.35 §1; repealed by 2017 c.150 §2]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.525 Application for financial aid; review of application; rules for program evaluation; use of funds; community corrections manager; modification of plan. (1) A county, group of counties or intergovernmental corrections entity shall apply to the Director of the Department of Corrections in a manner and form prescribed by the director for funding made available under ORS 423.500 to 423.560. The application shall include a community corrections plan. The Department of Corrections shall provide consultation and technical assistance to counties to aid in the development and implementation of community corrections plans
9.7K chars
(2)(a) From July 1, 1995, until June 30, 1999, a county, group of counties or intergovernmental corrections entity may make application requesting funding for the construction, acquisition, expansion or remodeling of correctional facilities to serve the county, group of counties …
ORS 423.530 Procedure for determining amount of financial grants; rules. (1) Financial grants for community corrections pursuant to ORS 423.500 to 423.560 consist of the Grant-in-Aid Program. The Grant-in-Aid Program consists of moneys appropriated to the Department of Corrections for the purposes of management, support services and supervision of offenders described in ORS 423.478 (2). The department shall determine, prior to July 1 of each odd-numbered year, each county’s percentage share of the amount appropriated for the purposes of this subsection. Such determination shall be based upon a weighted formula of workload and population as adopted by the department by rule. In adopting the rule, the department shall consult with a broad based committee including, but not limited to, representatives of the Department of Corrections, local county community corrections, county boards of commissioners and county sheriffs
0.4K chars
(2) Funding received by a county pursuant to ORS 423.500 to 423.560 approved for county corrections programs shall not be reduced by the department except by action of the Legislative Assembly or the Emergency Board. Such reductions shall be made proportionately using the applica…
ORS 423.535 Biennial community corrections plan required; county authority to contract for services. (1) Prior to receiving funds, the county shall have a biennial community corrections plan
0.4K chars
(2) The county and the Department of Corrections shall enter into an intergovernmental agreement referring to the plan. (3) The county may contract with public or private agencies including, but not limited to, other counties, cities, special districts and public or private agenc…
ORS 423.540 Program compliance review by Director of Department of Corrections; effect of failure to comply. The Director of the Department of Corrections shall biennially review a county’s compliance with the intergovernmental agreement under ORS 423.500 to 423.560. A county must substantially comply with the provisions of its community corrections intergovernmental agreement and plan established pursuant to ORS 423.525 (7). If the director determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a county is not in substantial compliance with the intergovernmental agreement or plan, the director shall contact the county regarding the alleged noncompliance and offer technical assistance to reach compliance. If the county does not resolve the alleged noncompliance, the director shall, after giving the county not less than 30 days’ notice, conduct a hearing to ascertain whether there is substantial compliance or satisfactory progress being made toward compliance. After technical assistance is provided and the hearing occurs, the director may suspend any portion of the funding made available to the county under ORS 423.500 to 423.560 until the required compliance occurs. [1977 c.412 §8; 1979 c.487 §14; 1987 c.320 §225; 1995 c.423 §8; 1997 c.715 §5; 2017 c.302 §1]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.545 [1977 c.412 §9; 1987 c.320 §226; repealed by 1995 c.423 §31]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.549 State positions in community corrections branch; abolishment; county authority; affected employees; pay. (1) Notwithstanding ORS 236.605 to 236.640, all state positions in the state community corrections branch of the Department of Corrections, the funding for which is transferred to counties, are abolished on January 1, 1997. Counties have sole discretion in the development of methods and means of county community corrections operation under ORS 423.500 to 423.560 including establishment of wages, benefits and working conditions and selection of any employees to operate supervision programs or other services and sanctions under ORS 423.478 and 423.525. The implementation of this section does not give rise to any bargaining obligation under ORS 243.650 to 243.809. Notwithstanding any collective bargaining agreement, the department shall first offer to any employee so affected and not hired by a county a vacant position in other department branches and operations for which the employee is qualified. This preference lapses 90 days after the operative date of this section. The department has sole discretion in selecting and filling vacant positions from among affected employees having preference
1.3K chars
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, for each month of employment during the period of January 1, 1997, through June 30, 1997, a county shall pay each affected employee hired by the county in regular full-time employment to provide or to support the provision of co…
ORS 423.550 [1977 c.412 §10; 1987 c.320 §227; 1989 c.607 §3; 1989 c.614 §3; 1993 c.680 §2; repealed by 1995 c.423 §15 (423.549 enacted in lieu of 423.550)]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.551 [1989 c.614 §5; repealed by 1995 c.423 §31]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.552 [1989 c.510 §2; repealed by 1995 c.423 §30]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.553 [1989 c.510 §3; repealed by 1995 c.423 §30]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.554 [1989 c.510 §§4,5; repealed by 1995 c.423 §30]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.555 Statewide program evaluation and information system. The Department of Corrections shall establish and operate, with the cooperation and participation of county community corrections agencies, a statewide evaluation and information system to monitor the effectiveness of correctional services provided to criminal offenders under ORS 423.500 to 423.560. To the extent of available information systems resources, the system shall permit ongoing evaluation of apparent correlations between services provided and future criminal conduct. [1977 c.412 §11; 1987 c.320 §228; 1995 c.423 §10; 1997 c.433 §12]
0.0K chars
[Repealed or reserved.]
ORS 423.557 “Recidivism” defined for statistical evaluations. (1) As used in this section, “recidivism” means the arrest, conviction or incarceration of a person who has previously been convicted of a crime, if the arrest, conviction or incarceration is for a new crime and occurs
0.9K chars
(a) Three years or less after the date the person was convicted of the previous crime; or (b) Three years or less after the date the person was released from custody, if the person was incarcerated as a result of the conviction for the previous crime. (2) When the Oregon Departme…
ORS 423.560 Local public safety coordinating council; duties. (1) The board of county commissioners of a county shall convene a local public safety coordinating council. The council shall include, but need not be limited to
2.9K chars
(a) A police chief selected by the police chiefs in the county; (b) The sheriff of the county or, if two or more counties have joined together to provide community corrections services, a sheriff selected by the sheriffs in the counties; (c) The district attorney of the county or…
ORS 423.565 Additional duties of public safety coordinating council. In addition to the duties assigned to it under ORS 423.560, the local public safety coordinating council convened by the board of commissioners shall, at a minimum
1.4K chars
(1) Develop and recommend to the county board of commissioners the plan for use of state resources to serve the local adjudicated youth population. (2) Coordinate local juvenile justice policy among affected juvenile justice entities. (3) Develop and recommend to the county board…
ORS 423.569 Annual summary. (1) The board or boards of county commissioners that have convened a local public safety coordinating council shall publish an annual summary of program, service or budget changes made in response to the recommendations of the local public safety coordinating council described in ORS 423.560 and 423.565
0.2K chars
(2) The summary described in subsection (1) of this section shall be provided to the local public safety coordinating council and the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission. [2007 c.682 §1]
ORS 423.570 [1981 c.169 §1; 1983 c.252 §1; 1987 c.320 §229; 1989 c.497 §1; 1989 c.790 §67; 1993 c.14 §23; 1995 c.423 §14; repealed by 2021 c.653 §1]
0.0K chars
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMS
ORS 423.600 Legislative findings. The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that
0.9K chars
(1) Restorative justice programs, including facilitated dialogues and responsibility letter banks, can promote justice and healing for crime victims and survivors and can aid adults in custody in the process of rehabilitation; (2) A facilitated dialogue or responsibility letter b…
ORS 423.605 Definition. As used in ORS 423.600 to 423.610, “facilitated dialogue and responsibility letter bank program communications” means all communications by a victim, survivor or adult in custody, or by a program facilitator, advisory committee member or staff person, that are made in the course of or in connection with a facilitated dialogue or responsibility letter bank program conducted pursuant to Department of Corrections rules. The communications include but are not limited to
0.7K chars
(1) All memoranda, assessment and evaluation forms, documents and other materials, including letters that are prepared for or submitted in connection with a facilitated dialogue; (2) All communications, whether oral, written or recorded, made during the intake of a case, during p…
ORS 423.610 Liability of persons associated with program; confidentiality of communications. (1) Facilitated dialogue and responsibility letter bank program facilitators, advisory committee members and staff persons shall not be compelled to testify or produce evidence in any judicial or administrative proceeding with respect to any facilitated dialogue or responsibility letter bank program communication, except as required under rules established pursuant to ORS 423.615
1.1K chars
(2) Facilitated dialogue and responsibility letter bank program facilitators, advisory committee members and staff persons are not civilly liable for any act or omission done or made while engaged in efforts to assist a victim, survivor or adult in custody in the course of or in …
ORS 423.615 Rules. The Department of Corrections shall adopt rules to carry out the provisions of ORS 423.600 to 423.610. [2017 c.114 §4]
0.1K chars
CHAPTERS 424 AND 425 [Reserved for expansion] _______________