Title 42, The Public Health and WelfareRelease 119-110
§629e Evaluations; Research; Technical Assistance
Title 42 › CHAPTER 7 — SOCIAL SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER IV — GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES › Part B — Child and Family Services › subpart 2 — promoting safe and stable families › § 629e
Summary
Requires the Secretary to check how well the programs under this part are working and to tell Congress about it every two years. The report must be sent by April 1 of every other year, starting in 2003, and must say how much was funded, which evaluations are happening, what they have found so far, and what technical help was given to States. The Secretary must coordinate federal and State evaluations when possible, set evaluation rules after talking with State agencies, nonprofit program providers, and evaluation experts, and spend at least $1,000,000 each year to (1) give technical help to grantees and support local site evaluations or let past grantees publish old data, and (2) support Indian Child Welfare Act work and related State plan measures. The Secretary must also give technical help to States and tribes to build risk screening tools, treatment models (especially for families with substance use disorders), make sure programs are carried out as planned, improve post‑adoption services, and coordinate funding across federal programs. Authorizes a funded family recovery and reunification replication project using a recovery coach model. Congress set aside $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2019 for the project, available through fiscal year 2026. The project must follow proven recovery coach steps (assessments, benefit help, goal setting and planning, home visits, case management, monitoring, frequent reporting among agencies, and coach assessments for caseworkers) and be run by grantees chosen by the Secretary. The Secretary must pick areas with enough treatment providers and participants, help design the program closely to proven models, ensure random assignment so a control group exists, get preliminary results within 4 years, and track impacts for at least 5 years. The evaluation must include a pilot, a randomized impact study that measures outcomes over multiple times (including at least 5 years) such as reunification, time to reunify, permanency, safety, treatment engagement, substance use, juvenile delinquency, and cost, and an implementation study. The Secretary must publish the pilot, impact, and implementation reports online and give analyses, a replication plan if warranted, and any recommendations. Allows competitive grants to evaluate prevention services and kinship navigator programs. Grants must link applicants with a State agency and, if needed, an external evaluator. The Secretary will favor projects that fill gaps in the federal clearinghouse of practices, add evidence‑based programs, finish evaluations quickly, and test adaptations of proven programs. The Secretary will try to identify external evaluators before taking applications but cannot deny an application for lacking one. Grant recipients must report on fund use and outcomes within 1 year and each year for 5 years. The Secretary must report annually to the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee about grants, programs, technical help, and clearinghouse activity. No more than 5 percent of funds for this subsection may be used for technical assistance, and the money remains available until spent. Definitions (one line each): Eligible entity — a State, local government, tribe, or certain agencies that provide the service or program; External evaluator — an outside group able and willing to evaluate the service; Service or program — a service described in section 671(e) or a kinship navigator program.
Full Legal Text
Title 42, §629e
The Public Health and Welfare, Source: USLM XML via OLRC
(a)Evaluations
(1)In general
The Secretary shall evaluate and report to the Congress biennially on the effectiveness of the programs carried out pursuant to this subpart in accomplishing the purposes of this subpart, and may evaluate any other Federal, State, or local program, regardless of whether federally assisted, that is designed to achieve the same purposes as the program under this subpart, in accordance with criteria established in accordance with paragraph (2).
(2)Criteria to be used
In developing the criteria to be used in evaluations under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with appropriate parties, such as—
(A)State agencies administering programs under this part and part E;
(B)persons administering child and family services programs (including family preservation and family support programs) for private, nonprofit organizations with an interest in child welfare including community-based partners with expertise in preventing unnecessary child welfare system involvement; and
(C)other persons with recognized expertise in the evaluation of child and family services programs (including family preservation and family support programs) or other related programs.
(3)Timing of report
Beginning in 2003, the Secretary shall submit the biennial report required by this subsection not later than April 1 of every other year, and shall include in each such report the funding level, the status of ongoing evaluations, findings to date, and the nature of any technical assistance provided to States under subsection (d).
(b)Coordination of evaluations
The Secretary shall develop procedures to coordinate evaluations under this section, to the extent feasible, with evaluations by the States of the effectiveness of programs under this subpart.
(c)Evaluation, research, and technical assistance with respect to targeted program resources
Of the amount reserved under section 629g(b)(1) of this title for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall use not less than—
(1)$1,000,000 for technical assistance to grantees under section 629g(f) of this title and to support design of local site evaluations with the goal of publishing and submitting evaluation findings to the clearinghouse established under section 676(d) of this title, or to award grants to allow current or former grantees under section 629g(f) of this title to analyze, publish, and submit to the clearinghouse data collected during past grants; and
(2)$1,000,000 for technical assistance required under section 628d of this title to support effective implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 [25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.] and to support development of associated State plan measures described pursuant to section 622(b)(9) of this title.
(d)Technical assistance
To the extent funds are available therefor, the Secretary shall provide technical assistance that helps States and Indian tribes or tribal consortia to—
(1)develop research-based protocols for identifying families at risk of abuse and neglect of use in the field;
(2)develop treatment models that address the needs of families at risk, particularly families with substance abuse issues;
(3)implement programs with well-articulated theories of how the intervention will result in desired changes among families at risk;
(4)establish mechanisms to ensure that service provision matches the treatment model;
(5)establish mechanisms to ensure that postadoption services meet the needs of the individual families and develop models to reduce the disruption rates of adoption; and
(6)use grants under section 629g(f) of this title in coordination with other Federal funds to better serve families in the child welfare system that are affected by a substance use disorder.
(e)Family recovery and reunification program replication project
(1)Purpose
The purpose of this subsection is to provide resources to the Secretary to support the conduct and evaluation of a family recovery and reunification program replication project (referred to in this subsection as the “project”) and to determine the extent to which such programs may be appropriate for use at different intervention points (such as when a child is at risk of entering foster care or when a child is living with a guardian while a parent is in treatment). The family recovery and reunification program conducted under the project shall use a recovery coach model that is designed to help reunify families and protect children by working with parents or guardians with a substance use disorder who have temporarily lost custody of their children.
(2)Program components
The family recovery and reunification program conducted under the project shall adhere closely to the elements and protocol determined to be most effective in other recovery coaching programs that have been rigorously evaluated and shown to increase family reunification and protect children and, consistent with such elements and protocol, shall provide such items and services as—
(A)assessments to evaluate the needs of the parent or guardian;
(B)assistance in receiving the appropriate benefits to aid the parent or guardian in recovery;
(C)services to assist the parent or guardian in prioritizing issues identified in assessments, establishing goals for resolving such issues that are consistent with the goals of the treatment provider, child welfare agency, courts, and other agencies involved with the parent or guardian or their children, and making a coordinated plan for achieving such goals;
(D)home visiting services coordinated with the child welfare agency and treatment provider involved with the parent or guardian or their children;
(E)case management services to remove barriers for the parent or guardian to participate and continue in treatment, as well as to re-engage a parent or guardian who is not participating or progressing in treatment;
(F)access to services needed to monitor the parent’s or guardian’s compliance with program requirements;
(G)frequent reporting between the treatment provider, child welfare agency, courts, and other agencies involved with the parent or guardian or their children to ensure appropriate information on the parent’s or guardian’s status is available to inform decision-making; and
(H)assessments and recommendations provided by a recovery coach to the child welfare caseworker responsible for documenting the parent’s or guardian’s progress in treatment and recovery as well as the status of other areas identified in the treatment plan for the parent or guardian, including a recommendation regarding the expected safety of the child if the child is returned to the custody of the parent or guardian that can be used by the caseworker and a court to make permanency decisions regarding the child.
(3)Responsibilities of the Secretary
(A)In general
The Secretary shall, through a grant or contract with 1 or more entities, conduct and evaluate the family recovery and reunification program under the project.
(B)Requirements
In identifying 1 or more entities to conduct the evaluation of the family recovery and reunification program, the Secretary shall—
(i)determine that the area or areas in which the program will be conducted have sufficient substance use disorder treatment providers and other resources (other than those provided with funds made available to carry out the project) to successfully conduct the program;
(ii)determine that the area or areas in which the program will be conducted have enough potential program participants, and will serve a sufficient number of parents or guardians and their children, so as to allow for the formation of a control group, evaluation results to be adequately powered, and preliminary results of the evaluation to be available within 4 years of the program’s implementation;
(iii)provide the entity or entities with technical assistance for the program design, including by working with 1 or more entities that are or have been involved in recovery coaching programs that have been rigorously evaluated and shown to increase family reunification and protect children so as to make sure the program conducted under the project adheres closely to the elements and protocol determined to be most effective in such other recovery coaching programs;
(iv)assist the entity or entities in securing adequate coaching, treatment, child welfare, court, and other resources needed to successfully conduct the family recovery and reunification program under the project; and
(v)ensure the entity or entities will be able to monitor the impacts of the program in the area or areas in which it is conducted for at least 5 years after parents or guardians and their children are randomly assigned to participate in the program or to be part of the program’s control group.
(4)Evaluation requirements
(A)In general
The Secretary, in consultation with the entity or entities conducting the family recovery and reunification program under the project, shall conduct an evaluation to determine whether the program has been implemented effectively and resulted in improvements for children and families. The evaluation shall have 3 components: a pilot phase, an impact study, and an implementation study.
(B)Pilot phase
The pilot phase component of the evaluation shall consist of the Secretary providing technical assistance to the entity or entities conducting the family recovery and reunification program under the project to ensure—
(i)the program’s implementation adheres closely to the elements and protocol determined to be most effective in other recovery coaching programs that have been rigorously evaluated and shown to increase family reunification and protect children; and
(ii)random assignment of parents or guardians and their children to be participants in the program or to be part of the program’s control group is being carried out.
(C)Impact study
The impact study component of the evaluation shall determine the impacts of the family recovery and reunification program conducted under the project on the parents and guardians and their children participating in the program. The impact study component shall—
(i)be conducted using an experimental design that uses a random assignment research methodology;
(ii)consistent with previous studies of other recovery coaching programs that have been rigorously evaluated and shown to increase family reunification and protect children, measure outcomes for parents and guardians and their children over multiple time periods, including for a period of 5 years; and
(iii)include measurements of family stability and parent, guardian, and child safety for program participants and the program control group that are consistent with measurements of such factors for participants and control groups from previous studies of other recovery coaching programs so as to allow results of the impact study to be compared with the results of such prior studies, including with respect to comparisons between program participants and the program control group regarding—
(I)safe family reunification;
(II)time to reunification;
(III)permanency (such as through measures of reunification, adoption, or placement with guardians);
(IV)safety (such as through measures of subsequent maltreatment);
(V)parental or guardian treatment persistence and engagement;
(VI)parental or guardian substance use;
(VII)juvenile delinquency;
(VIII)cost; and
(IX)other measurements agreed upon by the Secretary and the entity or entities operating the family recovery and reunification program under the project.
(D)Implementation study
The implementation study component of the evaluation shall be conducted concurrently with the conduct of the impact study component and shall include, in addition to such other information as the Secretary may determine, descriptions and analyses of— (i)
(ii)the difference in services received or proposed to be received by the program participants and the program control group.
(E)Report
The Secretary shall publish on an internet website maintained by the Secretary the following information:
(i)A report on the pilot phase component of the evaluation.
(ii)A report on the impact study component of the evaluation.
(iii)A report on the implementation study component of the evaluation.
(iv)A report that includes—
(I)analyses of the extent to which the program has resulted in increased reunifications, increased permanency, case closures, net savings to the State or States involved (taking into account both costs borne by States and the Federal government), or other outcomes, or if the program did not produce such outcomes, an analysis of why the replication of the program did not yield such results;
(II)if, based on such analyses, the Secretary determines the program should be replicated, a replication plan; and
(III)such recommendations for legislation and administrative action as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(5)Appropriation
In addition to any amounts otherwise made available to carry out this subpart, out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are appropriated $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2019 to carry out the project, which shall remain available through fiscal year 2026.
(f)Prevention services evaluation partnerships
(1)Purpose
The purpose of this subsection is to authorize the Secretary to make competitive grants to support the timely evaluation of— (A)
(B)kinship navigator programs described in section 674(a)(7) of this title.
(2)Grants
In accordance with applications approved under this subsection, the Secretary may make grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities to carry out projects designed to evaluate a service or program provided by the eligible entity, or an entity in partnership with the eligible entity, with respect to the requirements for a promising practice, supported practice, or well-supported practice described in section 671(e)(4)(C) of this title.
(3)Applications
(A)In general
An eligible entity may apply to the Secretary for a grant under this subsection to carry out a project that meets the following requirements:
(i)The project is designed in accordance with paragraph (2).
(ii)The project is to be carried out by the applicant in partnership with—
(I)a State agency that administers, or supervises the administration of, the State plan approved under part E, or an agency administering the plan under the supervision of the State agency; and
(II)if the applicant is unable or unwilling to do so, at least 1 external evaluator to carry out the evaluation of the service or program provided by the applicant.
(B)Contents
The application shall contain the following:
(i)A description of the project, including—
(I)a statement explaining why a grant is necessary to carry out the project; and
(II)the amount of grant funds that would be disbursed to each entity described in subparagraph (A)(ii) in partnership with the applicant.
(ii)A certification from each entity described in subparagraph (A)(ii) that provides assurances that the individual or entity is in partnership with the applicant and will fulfill the responsibilities of the entity specified in the description provided pursuant to clause (i) of this subparagraph.
(iii)A certification from the applicant that provides assurances that the applicant intends to comply with subparagraph (A)(ii)(II), if applicable.
(iv)At the option of the eligible entity, a certification from the applicant that the applicant requires an external evaluator secured by the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (5), if applicable.
(4)Priorities
In approving applications under this subsection, the Secretary shall prioritize the following:
(A)Addressing, with respect to the clearinghouse of practices described in section 676(d)(2) of this title, deficiencies or gaps identified by the Secretary in consultation with—
(i)States, political subdivisions of a State, and tribal communities carrying out, or receiving the benefits of, a service or program; and
(ii)child welfare experts, including individuals with lived experience.
(B)Maximizing the number of evidence-based services or programs to be included in the clearinghouse of practices described in section 676(d)(2) of this title.
(C)Timely completion of evaluations and the production of evidence.
(D)Supporting services or programs that are based on, or are adaptations to new population settings of, a service or program with reliable evidence about the benefits and risks of the service or program.
(5)Availability of external evaluators
(A)In general
Before accepting applications under this subsection, the Secretary shall make reasonable efforts to identify at least 1 entity to serve as an external evaluator for any eligible entity that includes a certification under paragraph (3)(B)(iv) with an application under this subsection.
(B)No effect on consideration of application
The Secretary may not consider whether an eligible entity is in partnership with an external evaluator described in paragraph (A) in approving an application under this subsection submitted by the eligible entity.
(6)Reports
(A)By grant recipients
Within 1 year after receiving a grant under this subsection, and every year thereafter for the next 5 years, the grant recipient shall submit to the Secretary a written report on—
(i)the use of grant funds;
(ii)whether the program or service evaluated by the project meets a requirement specified in section 671(e)(4)(C) of this title, including information about—
(I)how the program or service is being carried out in accordance with standards specified in the requirement;
(II)any outcomes of the program or service; and
(III)any outcome with respect to which the service or program compares favorably to a comparison practice; and
(iii)whether the Secretary has included the program or service in an update to the clearinghouse of practices described in section 676(d)(2) of this title.
(B)By the Secretary
The Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate an annual written report on—
(i)the grants awarded under this subsection;
(ii)the programs funded by the grants;
(iii)any technical assistance provided by the Secretary in carrying out this subsection, including with respect to the efforts to secure external evaluators pursuant to paragraph (5); and
(iv)any efforts by the Secretary to support program evaluation and review pursuant to section 671(e) of this title and inclusion of programs in the pre-approved list of services and programs described in section 671(e)(4)(D) of this title or the clearinghouse of practices described in section 676(d)(2) of this title.
(7)Funding
(A)Limitations
Of the amounts available to carry out this subsection, the Secretary may use not more than 5 percent to provide technical assistance.
(B)Carryover
Amounts made available to carry out this subsection shall remain available until expended.
(8)Definitions
In this subsection: (A) Eligible entity
(B)External evaluator (C) Service or program
The term “external evaluator” means an entity with the ability and willingness to evaluate a service or program pursuant to paragraph (2) that is not provided by the entity.
Legislative History
Notes & Related Subsidiaries
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is Pub. L. 95–608, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3069, which is classified generally to chapter 21 (§ 1901 et seq.) of Title 25, Indians. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title
note set out under section 1901 of Title 25 and Tables.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 435 of act Aug. 14, 1935, was classified to section 635 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–485.
Amendments
2025—Subsec. (a)(2)(B). Pub. L. 118–258, § 106(g), inserted before semicolon “including community-based partners with expertise in preventing unnecessary child welfare system involvement”. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–258, § 115(a), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) related to evaluation, research, and technical assistance with respect to targeted program resources. Subsec. (d)(6). Pub. L. 118–258, § 105(e), added par. (6). Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 118–258, § 108(a), added subsec. (f). 2018—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 115–271 added subsec. (e). 2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–288, § 4(c), amended heading and text of subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) related to topics for research and evaluation. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 109–288, § 5(b)(3)(C), inserted “or tribal consortia” after “Indian tribes” in introductory provisions. 2002—Pub. L. 107–133, § 105(1), substituted “Evaluations; research; technical assistance” for “Evaluations” in section catchline. Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 107–133, § 105(1), substituted “The Secretary shall evaluate and report to the Congress biennially on” for “The Secretary shall evaluate”. Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 107–133, § 105(2), added par. (3). Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 107–133, § 105(3), added subsecs. (c) and (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
of 2025 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 118–258 effective Oct. 1, 2025, and applicable to payments under this part for calendar quarters beginning on or after such date, with delay permitted if either State legislation or tribal action is required to meet additional requirements, see section 117 of Pub. L. 118–258, set out as a note under section 622 of this title.
Effective Date
of 2006 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 109–288 effective Oct. 1, 2006, and applicable to payments under this part and part E of this subchapter for calendar quarters beginning on or after such date, without regard to whether implementing
Regulations
have been promulgated, and with delay permitted if State legislation is required to meet additional requirements, see section 12(a), (b) of Pub. L. 109–288, set out as a note under section 621 of this title.
Effective Date
of 2002 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 107–133 effective Jan. 17, 2002, with delay permitted if State legislation is required, see section 301 of Pub. L. 107–133, set out as a note under section 629 of this title.
Reference
Citations & Metadata
Citation
42 U.S.C. § 629e
Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare
Last Updated
Sep 22, 2026
Release point: 119-110