§541 — Title 47 Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs | U.S. Code

Summary

A local franchising authority may give one or more cable TV franchises inside its area. It cannot give an exclusive franchise. It also cannot unreasonably refuse to let a second company compete. If someone is finally denied a second franchise, they can appeal under section 555. A franchise lets a cable company build its system in public rights-of-way and in easements meant for similar uses. While doing that, the cable company must not harm safety, use, or appearance of the property. The company or its subscribers must pay installation and removal costs, and the company must fairly pay owners for any damage. The franchising authority must not refuse service to a neighborhood because residents are low income. It must give the company a reasonable time to reach all homes. The authority may require proof the company will provide public, educational, and government access channels or money for them. It may also require proof of the company’s finances, technical ability, or legal standing. A cable operator needs a franchise to provide cable service, except if it was lawfully providing service on July 1, 1984 and the authority does not require a franchise. If a cable company or its affiliate offers telecommunications services, those services do not need a franchise and are not covered by this subchapter. States or the FCC may require informational tariffs for non‑cable communications services a cable system offers that would otherwise be regulated. States keep their power to regulate non‑cable communications and to license systems serving only residents of a single multiunit building that do not use public rights‑of‑way. A local government that also acts as the franchising authority may run a multichannel video service and does not have to get a franchise to do so.

Title 47, §541

Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs — Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)(1)A franchising authority may award, in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, 1 or more franchises within its jurisdiction; except that a franchising authority may not grant an exclusive franchise and may not unreasonably refuse to award an additional competitive franchise. Any applicant whose application for a second franchise has been denied by a final decision of the franchising authority may appeal such final decision pursuant to the provisions of section 555 of this title for failure to comply with this subsection.

(2)Any franchise shall be construed to authorize the construction of a cable system over public rights-of-way, and through easements, which is within the area to be served by the cable system and which have been dedicated for compatible uses, except that in using such easements the cable operator shall ensure—

(A)that the safety, functioning, and appearance of the property and the convenience and safety of other persons not be adversely affected by the installation or construction of facilities necessary for a cable system;

(B)that the cost of the installation, construction, operation, or removal of such facilities be borne by the cable operator or subscriber, or a combination of both; and

(C)that the owner of the property be justly compensated by the cable operator for any damages caused by the installation, construction, operation, or removal of such facilities by the cable operator.

(3)In awarding a franchise or franchises, a franchising authority shall assure that access to cable service is not denied to any group of potential residential cable subscribers because of the income of the residents of the local area in which such group resides.

(4)In awarding a franchise, the franchising authority—

(A)shall allow the applicant’s cable system a reasonable period of time to become capable of providing cable service to all households in the franchise area;

(B)may require adequate assurance that the cable operator will provide adequate public, educational, and governmental access channel capacity, facilities, or financial support; and

(C)may require adequate assurance that the cable operator has the financial, technical, or legal qualifications to provide cable service.

(b)(1)Except to the extent provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (f), a cable operator may not provide cable service without a franchise.

(2)Paragraph (1) shall not require any person lawfully providing cable service without a franchise on July 1, 1984, to obtain a franchise unless the franchising authority so requires.

(3)(A)If a cable operator or affiliate thereof is engaged in the provision of telecommunications services—

(i)such cable operator or affiliate shall not be required to obtain a franchise under this subchapter for the provision of telecommunications services; and

(ii)the provisions of this subchapter shall not apply to such cable operator or affiliate for the provision of telecommunications services.

(B)A franchising authority may not impose any requirement under this subchapter that has the purpose or effect of prohibiting, limiting, restricting, or conditioning the provision of a telecommunications service by a cable operator or an affiliate thereof.

(C)A franchising authority may not order a cable operator or affiliate thereof—

(i)to discontinue the provision of a telecommunications service, or

(ii)to discontinue the operation of a cable system, to the extent such cable system is used for the provision of a telecommunications service, by reason of the failure of such cable operator or affiliate thereof to obtain a franchise or franchise renewal under this subchapter with respect to the provision of such telecommunications service.

(D)Except as otherwise permitted by section 531 and 532 of this title, a franchising authority may not require a cable operator to provide any telecommunications service or facilities, other than institutional networks, as a condition of the initial grant of a franchise, a franchise renewal, or a transfer of a franchise.

(c)Any cable system shall not be subject to regulation as a common carrier or utility by reason of providing any cable service.

(d)(1)A State or the Commission may require the filing of informational tariffs for any intrastate communications service provided by a cable system, other than cable service, that would be subject to regulation by the Commission or any State if offered by a common carrier subject, in whole or in part, to subchapter II of this chapter. Such informational tariffs shall specify the rates, terms, and conditions for the provision of such service, including whether it is made available to all subscribers generally, and shall take effect on the date specified therein.

(2)Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to affect the authority of any State to regulate any cable operator to the extent that such operator provides any communication service other than cable service, whether offered on a common carrier or private contract basis.

(3)For purposes of this subsection, the term “State” has the meaning given it in section 153 of this title.

(e)Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to affect the authority of any State to license or otherwise regulate any facility or combination of facilities which serves only subscribers in one or more multiple unit dwellings under common ownership, control, or management and which does not use any public right-of-way.

(f)No provision of this chapter shall be construed to—

(1)prohibit a local or municipal authority that is also, or is affiliated with, a franchising authority from operating as a multichannel video programming distributor in the franchise area, notwithstanding the granting of one or more franchises by such franchising authority; or

(2)require such local or municipal authority to secure a franchise to operate as a multichannel video programming distributor.

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (f), was in the original “this Act”, meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652, 48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 609 of this title and Tables.

Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 104–104, § 303(a), added par. (3). Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 104–104, § 3(d)(3), substituted “section 153” for “section 153(v)”. 1992—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 102–385, § 7(a)(1), inserted before period at end “; except that a franchising authority may not grant an exclusive franchise and may not unreasonably refuse to award an additional competitive franchise. Any applicant whose application for a second franchise has been denied by a final decision of the franchising authority may appeal such final decision pursuant to the provisions of section 555 of this title for failure to comply with this subsection”. Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 102–385, § 7(b), added par. (4). Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 102–385, § 7(c)(1), inserted “and subsection (f)” after “paragraph (2)”. Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 102–385, § 7(c)(2), added subsec. (f).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 1992 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 102–385 effective 60 days after Oct. 5, 1992, see section 28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as a note under section 325 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of this title.

§541 General Franchise Requirements

Summary

Title 47, §541

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

References in Text

Amendments

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Effective Date

Citations & Metadata