Title 7, AgricultureRelease 119-110

§1359dd Allocation of Marketing Allotments

Title 7 › CHAPTER 35 — AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1938 › SUBCHAPTER II — LOANS, PARITY PAYMENTS, CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS, MARKETING QUOTAS, AND MARKETING CERTIFICATES › Part B — Marketing Quotas › subpart vii — flexible marketing allotments for sugar › § 1359dd

Last updated Sep 22, 2026|Official source

Summary

The Secretary must divide each year’s sugar marketing allotment among the sugar processors covered by that allotment so that everyone has a fair chance to sell sugar. For cane sugar, allocations are made after a hearing if affected cane processors or growers ask for one. In States with more than one cane processor, the split is based on past marketings and the processors’ ability to market sugar, using production averages from 1996 through 2000 (the two highest years for marketings and the three highest years for processing). For States that follow proportionate shares, similar rules use the two highest years from 1997 through 2001 for some measures. Allotments tied to the Talisman facility before May 13, 2002, follow the March 25 and 26, 1999 agreements. Processors that start on or after May 13, 2002, can apply for an allocation after a hearing; a new processor’s first-year allotment cannot exceed 50,000 short tons (raw value), and later amounts are set by the Secretary using the same criteria. If a new processor causes a new mainland State allotment, that amount is taken pro rata from other mainland States. The Secretary must consider harm to existing mainland processors before giving new allocations and must require proof the applicant can process and market the sugar. Only one new-processor allocation is allowed per processing facility. If a cane processor is sold, transferred, or closed in a corporate consolidation, the allocation moves to the buyer, new owner, successor, or remaining affiliated processor as appropriate. For beet sugar, the Secretary divides allotments among beet processors using an adjusted weighted average of each processor’s beet sugar in the 1998 through 2000 crop years, with weights of 25 percent for 1998, 35 percent for 1999, and 40 percent for 2000. The Secretary must adjust these amounts if a processor opened or closed a factory, built a molasses desugarization facility, or had large quality losses during the listed years. Opening a factory increases a processor’s share by 1.25 percent of the total adjusted weighted average for all processors per factory; closing a factory decreases it by 1.25 percent per factory; building a molasses desugarization facility increases it by 0.25 percent per facility; and substantial stored-beet losses increase it by 1.25 percent. If a beet processor permanently stops operating, its allocation is canceled and divided among the others pro rata. If a processor or all its assets are sold, the allocation usually transfers to the buyer. If one or more factories are sold, a matching pro rata part of the seller’s allocation moves to the buyer based on the factories’ historical contribution, unless buyer and seller agree otherwise; that assignment applies for the rest of the crop year and later years, and the buyer may use other factories to fill any shortfall. A “new entrant” for beet sugar is an entity with no allocation and not affiliated with an allocation holder that will process beets under contract. If a new entrant builds or reopens a factory not used since before 1998, the Secretary gives it an allocation to reach a similar factory use rate and reduces other processors’ allocations pro rata. If a new entrant buys a factory that has processed since 1998, allocation transfer requires mutual agreement; without agreement the new entrant cannot get an allocation. Decisions under these rules can be appealed to the Secretary under the appeals process.

Full Legal Text

Title 7, §1359dd

Agriculture, Source: USLM XML via OLRC

(a)Allocation to processors
Whenever marketing allotments are established for a crop year under section 1359cc of this title, in order to afford all interested persons an equitable opportunity to market sugar under an allotment, the Secretary shall allocate each such allotment among the processors covered by the allotment.
(b)Hearing and notice
(1)Cane sugar
(A)In general
The Secretary shall make allocations for cane sugar after a hearing, if requested by the affected sugarcane processors and growers, and on such notice as the Secretary by regulation may prescribe, in such manner and in such quantities as to provide a fair, efficient, and equitable distribution of the allocations under this paragraph. Each such allocation shall be subject to adjustment under section 1359cc(g) of this title.
(B)Multiple processor States
Except as provided in subparagraphs (C) and (D), the Secretary shall allocate the allotment for cane sugar among multiple cane sugar processors in a single State based on—
(i)past marketings of sugar, based on the average of the 2 highest years of production of raw cane sugar from among the 1996 through 2000 crops;
(ii)the ability of processors to market sugar covered by that portion of the allotment allocated for the crop year; and
(iii)past processings of sugar from sugarcane, based on the average of the 3 highest years of production during the 1996 through 2000 crop years.
(C)Talisman processing facility
In the case of allotments under subparagraph (B) attributable to the operations of the Talisman processing facility before May 13, 2002, the Secretary shall allocate the allotment among processors in the State under subparagraph (A) in accordance with the agreements of March 25 and 26, 1999, between the affected processors and the Secretary of the Interior.
(D)Proportionate share States
In the case of States subject to section 1359ff(c) of this title, the Secretary shall allocate the allotment for cane sugar among multiple cane sugar processors in a single State based on—
(i)past marketings of sugar, based on the average of the 2 highest years of production of raw cane sugar from among the 1997 through 2001 crop years;
(ii)the ability of processors to market sugar covered by that portion of the allotments allocated for the crop year; and
(iii)past processings of sugar from sugarcane, based on the average of the 2 highest crop years of crop production during the 1997 through 2001 crop years.
(E)New entrants
(i)In general
Notwithstanding subparagraphs (B) and (D), the Secretary, on application of any processor that begins processing sugarcane on or after May 13, 2002, and after a hearing (if requested by the affected sugarcane processors and growers) and on such notice as the Secretary by regulation may prescribe, may provide the processor with an allocation that provides a fair, efficient and equitable distribution of the allocations from the allotment for the State in which the processor is located.
(ii)Proportionate share States
In the case of proportionate share States, the Secretary shall establish proportionate shares in a quantity sufficient to produce the sugarcane required to satisfy the allocations.
(iii)Limitations
The allotment for a new processor under this subparagraph shall not exceed—
(I)in the case of the first crop year of operation of a new processor, 50,000 short tons (raw value); and
(II)in the case of each subsequent crop year of operation of the new processor, a quantity established by the Secretary in accordance with this subparagraph and the criteria described in subparagraph (B) or (D), as applicable.
(iv)New entrant States
(I)In general
Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (C) of section 1359cc(e)(3) of this title, to accommodate an allocation under clause (i) to a new processor located in a new entrant mainland State, the Secretary shall provide the new entrant mainland State with an allotment.
(II)Effect on other allotments
The allotment to any new entrant mainland State shall be subtracted, on a pro rata basis, from the allotments otherwise allotted to each mainland State under section 1359cc(e)(3) of this title.
(v)Adverse effects
Before providing an initial processor allocation or State allotment to a new entrant processor or a new entrant State under this subparagraph, the Secretary shall take into consideration any adverse effects that the provision of the allocation or allotment may have on existing cane processors and producers in mainland States.
(vi)Ability to market
Consistent with section 1359cc of this title and this section, any processor allocation or State allotment made to a new entrant processor or to a new entrant State under this subparagraph shall be provided only after the applicant processor, or the applicable processors in the State, have demonstrated the ability to process, produce, and market (including the transfer or delivery of the raw cane sugar to a refinery for further processing or marketing) raw cane sugar for the crop year for which the allotment is applicable.
(vii)Prohibition
Not more than 1 processor allocation provided under this subparagraph may be applicable to any individual sugar processing facility.
(F)Transfer of ownership
If a sugarcane processor is sold or otherwise transferred to another owner or is closed as part of an affiliated corporate group processing consolidation, the Secretary shall transfer the allotment allocation for the processor to the purchaser, new owner, successor in interest, or any remaining processor of an affiliated entity, as applicable, of the processor.
(2)Beet sugar
(A)In general
Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph and section 1359cc(g), 1359ee(b), and 1359ff(b) of this title, the Secretary shall make allocations for beet sugar among beet sugar processors for each crop year that allotments are in effect on the basis of the adjusted weighted average quantity of beet sugar produced by the processors for each of the 1998 through 2000 crop years, as determined under this paragraph.
(B)Quantity
The quantity of an allocation made for a beet sugar processor for a crop year under subparagraph (A) shall bear the same ratio to the quantity of allocations made for all beet sugar processors for the crop year as the adjusted weighted average quantity of beet sugar produced by the processor (as determined under subparagraphs (C) and (D)) bears to the total of the adjusted weighted average quantities of beet sugar produced by all processors (as so determined).
(C)Weighted average quantity
Subject to subparagraph (D), the weighted quantity of beet sugar produced by a beet sugar processor during each of the 1998 through 2000 crop years shall be (as determined by the Secretary)—
(i)in the case of the 1998 crop year, 25 percent of the quantity of beet sugar produced by the processor during the crop year;
(ii)in the case of the 1999 crop year, 35 percent of the quantity of beet sugar produced by the processor during the crop year; and
(iii)in the case of the 2000 crop year, 40 percent of the quantity of beet sugar produced by the processor (including any quantity of sugar received from the Commodity Credit Corporation) during the crop year.
(D)Adjustments
(i)In general
The Secretary shall adjust the weighted average quantity of beet sugar produced by a beet sugar processor during the 1998 through 2000 crop years under subparagraph (C) if the Secretary determines that the processor— (I)
(II)during the 1998 through 2000 crop years, closed a sugar beet processing factory;
(III)during the 1998 through 2000 crop years, constructed a molasses desugarization facility; or
(IV)during the 1998 through 2000 crop years, suffered substantial quality losses on sugar beets stored during any such crop year.
(ii)Quantity
The quantity of beet sugar produced by a beet sugar processor under subparagraph (C) shall be—
(I)in the case of a processor that opened a sugar beet processing factory, increased by 1.25 percent of the total of the adjusted weighted average quantities of beet sugar produced by all processors during the 1998 through 2000 crop years (without consideration of any adjustment under this subparagraph) for each sugar beet processing factory that is opened by the processor;
(II)in the case of a processor that closed a sugar beet processing factory, decreased by 1.25 percent of the total of the adjusted weighted average quantities of beet sugar produced by all processors during the 1998 through 2000 crop years (without consideration of any adjustment under this subparagraph) for each sugar beet processing factory that is closed by the processor;
(III)in the case of a processor that constructed a molasses desugarization facility, increased by 0.25 percent of the total of the adjusted weighted average quantities of beet sugar produced by all processors during the 1998 through 2000 crop years (without consideration of any adjustment under this subparagraph) for each molasses desugarization facility that is constructed by the processor; and
(IV)in the case of a processor that suffered substantial quality losses on stored sugar beets, increased by 1.25 percent of the total of the adjusted weighted average quantities of beet sugar produced by all processors during the 1998 through 2000 crop years (without consideration of any adjustment under this subparagraph).
(E)Permanent termination of operations of a processor (F) Sale of all assets of a processor to another processor (G) Sale of factories of a processor to another processor (H) New entrants starting production, reopening, or acquiring an existing factory with production history
If a processor of beet sugar has been dissolved, liquidated in a bankruptcy proceeding, or otherwise has permanently terminated operations (other than in conjunction with a sale or other disposition of the processor or the assets of the processor), the Secretary shall—
(i)eliminate the allocation of the processor provided under this section; and
(ii)distribute the allocation to other beet sugar processors on a pro rata basis.

Legislative History

Notes & Related Subsidiaries

Editorial Notes

Codification Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical

Amendments

to this section. The

Amendments

by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

Prior Provisions

A prior section 1359dd, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, § 359d, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title IX, § 902, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3483; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title I, § 111(f), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1833, related to allocation of marketing allotments, prior to the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 107–171.

Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b)(1)(F). Pub. L. 110–246, § 1403(d)(1), substituted “If” for “Except as otherwise provided in section 1359ff(c)(8) of this title, if”. Subsec. (b)(2)(G) to (I). Pub. L. 110–246, § 1403(d)(2), added subpars. (G) and (H) and struck out former subpars. (G) to (I) which related to sale of factories of a processor to another processor, new entrants starting production or reopening factories after May 13, 2002, and new entrants acquiring ongoing factories with production history during the period of the 1998 through 2000 crop years.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

of 2008 AmendmentAmendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an

Effective Date

note under section 8701 of this title.

Reference

Citations & Metadata

Citation

7 U.S.C. § 1359dd

Title 7, Agriculture

Last Updated

Sep 22, 2026

Release point: 119-110