Terminal naftowy w Petersburgu stanął w ogniu
A fire at an oil terminal in Saint Petersburg could interrupt storage and handling flows for petroleum products.
Source →The trace
How it reaches your house.
Starting from Irving Oil, we walked the supply graph hop by hop to the goods you buy and the companies you own. Each step is the engine’s reasoning, scored for confidence and cited where a source backs it.
First impact
Peninsula Petroleum Ltd. →Prices riseA fire disrupting storage and handling at a petroleum terminal can tighten bunker-fuel availability and raise Peninsula's input costs, but the 8% share, high substitutability, and roughly one-month replaceability limit the transmission.
54% confidenceHop 2
Marine Diesel and Bunker Fuel →Shortage riskMarine diesel and bunker fuel are critical inputs for fishing and seafood logistics, so a disruption at the fuel node can make seafood and fish scarcer.
88% confidenceMarine Diesel and Bunker Fuel →DelaysBecause the incident is in Saint Petersburg, it can directly disrupt Russia's storage and handling of this fuel, stretching delivery lead times for its supply share.
70% confidenceHop 3
Seafood and fish →DelaysVessel Processing or Chilled Transport
The bunker-fuel disruption already upstream of seafood and fish would slow vessel operations and refrigerated transport, delaying seafood throughput.
70% confidenceRussia →DelaysWeatherford International plcWFRD
With roughly 7% of revenue from Russia, Weatherford is materially exposed to Russian logistics disruptions that can slow oilfield-service activity and revenue flow.
64% confidenceSeafood and fish →DelaysPort Unloading and Quality Grading
Reduced and later vessel arrivals from the fuel shock can bottleneck port handling, delaying unloading and grading.