HR1841119th Congress

Peace on the Korean Peninsula Act

Sponsored By: Representative Sherman

Introduced

Summary

Seek a binding peace agreement to formally end the Korean War while rethinking U.S. travel rules for North Korea and exploring liaison offices to support diplomacy. It would require the State Department to review travel restrictions, clarify which humanitarian trips qualify for Special Validation Passports, and plan steps toward a formal, negotiated peace.

Show full summary
  • Families: Directs the State Department to review whether funerals, burials, and family commemorations in North Korea should count as "compelling humanitarian" reasons for Special Validation Passports.
  • Travelers: Requires a comprehensive review of existing travel restrictions and the guidance on when travel is "in the national interest," plus a report to Congress within 180 days.
  • Diplomacy and officials: Orders urgent diplomatic planning with North and South Korea to produce a roadmap and negotiate a binding peace agreement and seeks negotiations to establish bilateral liaison offices based on the 2018 Singapore statement.
  • U.S. forces: States explicitly that nothing in the bill changes the status of U.S. armed forces in South Korea or other countries.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Plan for a Korean peace agreement

If enacted, the Secretary of State would deliver a plan within 180 days to reach a binding peace agreement on the Korean peninsula. The report would map steps to start talks, list key stakeholders, and explain the main hurdles. It would be unclassified, with a classified annex allowed.

Review of North Korea travel rules for Americans

If enacted, the Secretary of State would review U.S. travel limits to North Korea. The review would explain when travel is in the national interest and what counts as a compelling humanitarian reason. It would consider whether funerals or family religious events should allow Special Validation Passports. A report to Congress would be due within 180 days. It would be unclassified, with a classified annex allowed.

No change to U.S. forces’ status

If enacted, the bill would not change the legal status of U.S. Armed Forces in South Korea or any other country. It would keep current rules and operations in place.

Free Policy Watch

You just read the policy. Now see what it costs you.

Pick a topic. PRIA runs your household against live legislation and sends you a free personalized readout.

Pick a topic to get started

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Sherman

CA • D

Cosponsors

  • Biggs (AZ)

    AZ • R

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Chu

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Min

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]

    GU • R

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

    DC • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Amo

    RI • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Brownley

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Casar

    TX • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Carson

    IN • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Correa

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Davis (IL)

    IL • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Espaillat

    NY • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Frost

    FL • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Garcia (IL)

    IL • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Gottheimer

    NJ • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Green, Al (TX)

    TX • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Raúl Grijalva

    AZ • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Jackson (IL)

    IL • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Jayapal

    WA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Kamlager-Dove

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Khanna

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Levin

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Lofgren

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • McGovern

    MA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Omar

    MN • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Pingree

    ME • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Schakowsky

    IL • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Strickland

    WA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Takano

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Titus

    NV • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Tonko

    NY • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Tran

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Vargas

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Lieu

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/21/2025

  • Suozzi

    NY • D

    Sponsored 3/31/2025

  • Ramirez

    IL • D

    Sponsored 4/1/2025

  • McBride

    DE • D

    Sponsored 5/14/2025

  • Tlaib

    MI • D

    Sponsored 5/14/2025

  • Lee (NV)

    NV • D

    Sponsored 6/4/2025

  • Waters

    CA • D

    Sponsored 6/26/2025

  • Sewell

    AL • D

    Sponsored 7/14/2025

  • Costa

    CA • D

    Sponsored 8/15/2025

  • Magaziner

    RI • D

    Sponsored 8/15/2025

  • Clarke (NY)

    NY • D

    Sponsored 8/15/2025

  • Davis (NC)

    NC • D

    Sponsored 2/9/2026

  • Raskin

    MD • D

    Sponsored 4/14/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov

Live Policy Activity

Live

Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph — ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.

Cached · 3 days ago1,439Wiki0 signals surfaced
Back to Legislation

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Take the PRIA Score to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in