Title 19 — Customs DutiesRelease 119-73
§1677 Definitions; special rules
Title 19 › Chapter CHAPTER 4— - TARIFF ACT OF 1930 › Subtitle SUBTITLE IV— - COUNTERVAILING AND ANTIDUMPING DUTIES › Part Part IV— - General Provisions › § 1677
Summary
Defines key words and simple rules used to decide when imported goods get special government help or are sold unfairly low, and how officials check if U.S. businesses are hurt. It tells who acts for the government, what counts as a country or an industry, what a countervailable subsidy is, how to judge injury to U.S. producers, and who can take part in these cases. Key term meanings in one line each: administering authority — the Secretary of Commerce or whoever the law assigns; Commission — the U.S. International Trade Commission; country — a foreign nation or its parts, and sometimes a group of countries in a customs union; industry — the U.S. producers of a like product or those making most of it, with rules about related companies and regional markets; processed agricultural products — may include growers when production is continuous and economic interests line up; countervailable subsidy — government financial help that is specific to certain producers or industries; financial contribution — things like grants, loans, tax breaks, goods, or purchases; benefit — an economic gain to the recipient, measured by differences from normal market terms; some subsidies are treated as non‑countervailable if they meet specific WTO‑based limits (for example, research aid up to 75% for industrial research, 50% for precompetitive development, or 62.5% when both apply; regional development, limited environmental aid up to 20% of adaptation costs; or if the program was properly notified to the WTO); material injury — harm that is real and important; when judging injury the Commission must look at import volume, price effects, and impact on U.S. producers and may consider many economic factors and threats of future harm; negligible imports — usually under 3% of U.S. imports from a country (4% for developing countries) with aggregate tests at 7% (or 9% for developing countries); interested party — lists who can participate (exporters, importers, producers, governments, unions, and trade groups); domestic like product and foreign like product — the U.S. or foreign goods most similar to the imports; nonmarket economy country — a country the administering authority finds does not use market pricing; affiliated persons — family, officers, partners, owners with 5%+ voting stock, and other control relationships; dumping and dumping margin — selling below fair value and the amount by which fair value exceeds the export price; developing and least developed countries — listed by the U.S. Trade Representative.
Full Legal Text
Title 19, §1677
Customs Duties — Source: USLM XML via OLRC
For purposes of this subtitle—
(1)The term “administering authority” means the Secretary of Commerce, or any other officer of the United States to whom the responsibility for carrying out the duties of the administering authority under this subtitle are transferred by law.
(2)The term “Commission” means the United States International Trade Commission.
(3)The term “country” means a foreign country, a political subdivision, dependent territory, or possession of a foreign country, and, except for the purpose of antidumping proceedings, may include an association of 2 or more foreign countries, political subdivisions, dependent territories, or possessions of countries into a customs union outside the United States.
(4)(A)The term “industry” means the producers as a whole of a domestic like product, or those producers whose collective output of a domestic like product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product.
(B)(i)If a producer of a domestic like product and an exporter or importer of the subject merchandise are related parties, or if a producer of the domestic like product is also an importer of the subject merchandise, the producer may, in appropriate circumstances, be excluded from the industry.
(ii)For purposes of clause (i), a producer and an exporter or importer shall be considered to be related parties, if—
(I)the producer directly or indirectly controls the exporter or importer,
(II)the exporter or importer directly or indirectly controls the producer,
(III)a third party directly or indirectly controls the producer and the exporter or importer, or
(IV)the producer and the exporter or importer directly or indirectly control a third party and there is reason to believe that the relationship causes the producer to act differently than a nonrelated producer.
(C)In appropriate circumstances, the United States, for a particular product market, may be divided into 2 or more markets and the producers within each market may be treated as if they were a separate industry if—
(i)the producers within such market sell all or almost all of their production of the domestic like product in question in that market, and
(ii)the demand in that market is not supplied, to any substantial degree, by producers of the product in question located elsewhere in the United States.
(D)The effect of dumped imports or imports of merchandise benefiting from a countervailable subsidy shall be assessed in relation to the United States production of a domestic like product if available data permit the separate identification of production in terms of such criteria as the production process or the producer’s profits. If the domestic production of the domestic like product has no separate identity in terms of such criteria, then the effect of the dumped imports or imports of merchandise benefiting from a countervailable subsidy shall be assessed by the examination of the production of the narrowest group or range of products, which includes a domestic like product, for which the necessary information can be provided.
(E)(i)Subject to clause (v), in an investigation involving a processed agricultural product produced from any raw agricultural product, the producers or growers of the raw agricultural product may be considered part of the industry producing the processed product if—
(I)the processed agricultural product is produced from the raw agricultural product through a single continuous line of production; and
(II)there is a substantial coincidence of economic interest between the producers or growers of the raw agricultural product and the processors of the processed agricultural product based upon relevant economic factors, which may, in the discretion of the Commission, include price, added market value, or other economic interrelationships (regardless of whether such coincidence of economic interest is based upon any legal relationship).
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the processed agricultural product shall be considered to be processed from a raw agricultural product through a single continuous line of production if—
(I)the raw agricultural product is substantially or completely devoted to the production of the processed agricultural product; and
(II)the processed agricultural product is produced substantially or completely from the raw product.
(iii)For purposes of clause (i)(II), in addition to such other factors it considers relevant to the question of coincidence of economic interest, the Commission shall—
(I)if price is taken into account, consider the degree of correlation between the price of the raw agricultural product and the price of the processed agricultural product; and
(II)if added market value is taken into account, consider whether the value of the raw agricultural product constitutes a significant percentage of the value of the processed agricultural product.
(iv)For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “raw agricultural product” means any farm or fishery product.
(v)This subparagraph shall cease to have effect if the United States Trade Representative notifies the administering authority and the Commission that the application of this subparagraph is inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States.
(5)(A)Except as provided in paragraph (5B), a countervailable subsidy is a subsidy described in this paragraph which is specific as described in paragraph (5A).
(B)A subsidy is described in this paragraph in the case in which an authority—
(i)provides a financial contribution,
(ii)provides any form of income or price support within the meaning of Article XVI of the GATT 1994, or
(iii)makes a payment to a funding mechanism to provide a financial contribution, or entrusts or directs a private entity to make a financial contribution, if providing the contribution would normally be vested in the government and the practice does not differ in substance from practices normally followed by governments,
(C)The determination of whether a subsidy exists shall be made without regard to whether the recipient of the subsidy is publicly or privately owned and without regard to whether the subsidy is provided directly or indirectly on the manufacture, production, or export of merchandise. The administering authority is not required to consider the effect of the subsidy in determining whether a subsidy exists under this paragraph.
(D)The term “financial contribution” means—
(i)the direct transfer of funds, such as grants, loans, and equity infusions, or the potential direct transfer of funds or liabilities, such as loan guarantees,
(ii)foregoing or not collecting revenue that is otherwise due, such as granting tax credits or deductions from taxable income,
(iii)providing goods or services, other than general infrastructure, or
(iv)purchasing goods.
(E)A benefit shall normally be treated as conferred where there is a benefit to the recipient, including—
(i)in the case of an equity infusion, if the investment decision is inconsistent with the usual investment practice of private investors, including the practice regarding the provision of risk capital, in the country in which the equity infusion is made,
(ii)in the case of a loan, if there is a difference between the amount the recipient of the loan pays on the loan and the amount the recipient would pay on a comparable commercial loan that the recipient could actually obtain on the market,
(iii)in the case of a loan guarantee, if there is a difference, after adjusting for any difference in guarantee fees, between the amount the recipient of the guarantee pays on the guaranteed loan and the amount the recipient would pay for a comparable commercial loan if there were no guarantee by the authority, and
(iv)in the case where goods or services are provided, if such goods or services are provided for less than adequate remuneration, and in the case where goods are purchased, if such goods are purchased for more than adequate remuneration.
(F)A change in ownership of all or part of a foreign enterprise or the productive assets of a foreign enterprise does not by itself require a determination by the administering authority that a past countervailable subsidy received by the enterprise no longer continues to be countervailable, even if the change in ownership is accomplished through an arm’s length transaction.
(5A)(A)A subsidy is specific if it is an export subsidy described in subparagraph (B) or an import substitution subsidy described in subparagraph (C), or if it is determined to be specific pursuant to subparagraph (D).
(B)An export subsidy is a subsidy that is, in law or in fact, contingent upon export performance, alone or as 1 of 2 or more conditions.
(C)An import substitution subsidy is a subsidy that is contingent upon the use of domestic goods over imported goods, alone or as 1 of 2 or more conditions.
(D)In determining whether a subsidy (other than a subsidy described in subparagraph (B) or (C)) is a specific subsidy, in law or in fact, to an enterprise or industry within the jurisdiction of the authority providing the subsidy, the following guidelines shall apply:
(i)Where the authority providing the subsidy, or the legislation pursuant to which the authority operates, expressly limits access to the subsidy to an enterprise or industry, the subsidy is specific as a matter of law.
(ii)Where the authority providing the subsidy, or the legislation pursuant to which the authority operates, establishes objective criteria or conditions governing the eligibility for, and the amount of, a subsidy, the subsidy is not specific as a matter of law, if—
(I)eligibility is automatic,
(II)the criteria or conditions for eligibility are strictly followed, and
(III)the criteria or conditions are clearly set forth in the relevant statute, regulation, or other official document so as to be capable of verification.
(iii)Where there are reasons to believe that a subsidy may be specific as a matter of fact, the subsidy is specific if one or more of the following factors exist:
(I)The actual recipients of the subsidy, whether considered on an enterprise or industry basis, are limited in number.
(II)An enterprise or industry is a predominant user of the subsidy.
(III)An enterprise or industry receives a disproportionately large amount of the subsidy.
(IV)The manner in which the authority providing the subsidy has exercised discretion in the decision to grant the subsidy indicates that an enterprise or industry is favored over others.
(iv)Where a subsidy is limited to an enterprise or industry located within a designated geographical region within the jurisdiction of the authority providing the subsidy, the subsidy is specific.
(5B)(A)Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (5) and (5A), in the case of merchandise imported from a Subsidies Agreement country, a subsidy shall be treated as noncountervailable if the administering authority determines in an investigation under part I of this subtitle or a review under part III of this subtitle that the subsidy meets all of the criteria described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (D), as the case may be, or the provisions of subparagraph (E)(i) apply.
(B)(i)Except for a subsidy provided on the manufacture, production, or export of civil aircraft, a subsidy for research activities conducted by a person, or by a higher education or research establishment on a contract basis with a person, shall be treated as noncountervailable, if the subsidy covers not more than 75 percent of the costs of industrial research or not more than 50 percent of the costs of precompetitive development activity, and such subsidy is limited exclusively to—
(I)the costs of researchers, technicians, and other supporting staff employed exclusively in the research activity,
(II)the costs of instruments, equipment, land, or buildings that are used exclusively and permanently (except when disposed of on a commercial basis) for the research activity,
(III)the costs of consultancy and equivalent services used exclusively for the research activity, including costs for bought-in research, technical knowledge, and patents,
(IV)additional overhead costs incurred directly as a result of the research activity, and
(V)other operating costs (such as materials and supplies) incurred directly as a result of the research activity.
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph—
(I)The term “industrial research” means planned search or critical investigation aimed at the discovery of new knowledge, with the objective that such knowledge may be useful in developing new products, processes, or services, or in bringing about a significant improvement to existing products, processes, or services.
(II)The term “precompetitive development activity” means the translation of industrial research findings into a plan, blueprint, or design for new, modified, or improved products, processes, or services, whether intended for sale or use, including the creation of a first prototype that would not be capable of commercial use. The term also may include the conceptual formulation and design of products, processes, or services alternatives and initial demonstration or pilot projects, if these same projects cannot be converted or used for industrial application or commercial exploitation. The term does not include routine or periodic alterations to existing products, production lines, manufacturing processes, services, or other ongoing operations even if those alterations may represent improvements.
(iii)(I)In the case of a research activity that spans both industrial research and precompetitive development activity, the allowable level of the noncountervailable subsidy shall not exceed 62.5 percent of the costs set forth in subclauses (I), (II), (III), (IV), and (V) of clause (i).
(II)The allowable level of a noncountervailable subsidy described in clause (i) shall be based on the total eligible costs incurred over the duration of a particular project.
(C)(i)A subsidy provided, pursuant to a general framework of regional development, to a person located in a disadvantaged region within a country shall be treated as noncountervailable, if it is not specific (within the meaning of paragraph (5A)) within eligible regions and if the following conditions are met:
(I)Each region identified as disadvantaged within the territory of a country is a clearly designated, contiguous geographical area with a definable economic and administrative identity.
(II)Each region is considered a disadvantaged region on the basis of neutral and objective criteria indicating that the region is disadvantaged because of more than temporary circumstances, and such criteria are clearly stated in the relevant statute, regulation, or other official document so as to be capable of verification.
(III)The criteria described in subclause (II) include a measurement of economic development.
(IV)Programs provided within a general framework of regional development include ceilings on the amount of assistance that can be granted to a subsidized project. Such ceilings are differentiated according to the different levels of development of assisted regions, and are expressed in terms of investment costs or costs of job creation. Within such ceilings, the distribution of assistance is sufficiently broad and even to avoid the predominant use of a subsidy by, or the provision of disproportionately large amounts of a subsidy to, an enterprise or industry as described in paragraph (5A)(D).
(ii)For purposes of clause (i), the measurement of economic development shall be based on one or more of the following factors:
(I)Per capita income, household per capita income, or per capita gross domestic product that does not exceed 85 percent of the average for the country subject to investigation or review.
(II)An unemployment rate that is at least 110 percent of the average unemployment rate for the country subject to investigation or review.
(iii)For purposes of this subparagraph—
(I)The term “general framework of regional development” means that the regional subsidy programs are part of an internally consistent and generally applicable regional development policy, and that regional development subsidies are not granted in isolated geographical points having no, or virtually no, influence on the development of a region.
(II)The term “neutral and objective criteria” means criteria that do not favor certain regions beyond what is appropriate for the elimination or reduction of regional disparities within the framework of the regional development policy.
(D)(i)A subsidy that is provided to promote the adaptation of existing facilities to new environmental requirements that are imposed by statute or by regulation, and that result in greater constraints and financial burdens on the recipient of the subsidy, shall be treated as noncountervailable, if the subsidy—
(I)is a one-time nonrecurring measure,
(II)is limited to 20 percent of the cost of adaptation,
(III)does not cover the cost of replacing and operating the subsidized investment, a cost that must be fully borne by the recipient,
(IV)is directly linked and proportionate to the recipient’s planned reduction of nuisances and pollution, and does not cover any manufacturing cost savings that may be achieved, and
(V)is available to all persons that can adopt the new equipment or production processes.
(ii)For purposes of this subparagraph, the term “existing facilities” means facilities that have been in operation for at least 2 years before the date on which the new environmental requirements are imposed.
(E)(i)If a subsidy is provided pursuant to a program that has been notified in accordance with Article 8.3 of the Subsidies Agreement, the subsidy shall be treated as noncountervailable and shall not be subject to investigation or review under this subtitle.
(ii)Notwithstanding clause (i), a subsidy shall be treated as countervailable if—
(I)the Trade Representative notifies the administering authority that a determination has been made pursuant to Article 8.4 or 8.5 of the Subsidies Agreement that the subsidy, or the program pursuant to which the subsidy was provided, does not satisfy the conditions and criteria of Article 8.2 of the Subsidies Agreement; and
(II)the subsidy is specific within the meaning of paragraph (5A).
(F)Domestic support measures that are provided with respect to products listed in Annex 1 to the Agreement on Agriculture, and that the administering authority determines conform fully to the provisions of Annex 2 to that Agreement, shall be treated as noncountervailable. Upon request by the administering authority, the Trade Representative shall provide advice regarding the interpretation and application of Annex 2.
(G)(i)Subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (E) shall not apply on or after the first day of the month that is 66 months after the WTO Agreement enters into force, unless the provisions of such subparagraphs are extended pursuant to section 3572(c) of this title.
(ii)Subparagraph (F) shall not apply to imports from a WTO member country at the end of the 9-year period beginning on January 1, 1995. The Trade Representative shall determine the precise termination date for each WTO member country in accordance with paragraph (i) of Article 1 of the Agreement on Agriculture and such date shall be notified to the administering authority.
(6)For the purpose of determining the net countervailable subsidy, the administering authority may subtract from the gross countervailable subsidy the amount of—
(A)any application fee, deposit, or similar payment paid in order to qualify for, or to receive, the benefit of the countervailable subsidy,
(B)any loss in the value of the countervailable subsidy resulting from its deferred receipt, if the deferral is mandated by Government order, and
(C)export taxes, duties, or other charges levied on the export of merchandise to the United States specifically intended to offset the countervailable subsidy received.
(7)(A)The term “material injury” means harm which is not inconsequential, immaterial, or unimportant.
(B)In making determinations under section 1671b(a), 1671d(b), 1673b(a), and 1673d(b) of this title, the Commission, in each case—
(i)shall consider—
(I)the volume of imports of the subject merchandise,
(II)the effect of imports of that merchandise on prices in the United States for domestic like products, and
(III)the impact of imports of such merchandise on domestic producers of domestic like products, but only in the context of production operations within the United States; and
(ii)may consider such other economic factors as are relevant to the determination regarding whether there is material injury by reason of imports.
(C)For purposes of subparagraph (B)—
(i)In evaluating the volume of imports of merchandise, the Commission shall consider whether the volume of imports of the merchandise, or any increase in that volume, either in absolute terms or relative to production or consumption in the United States, is significant.
(ii)In evaluating the effect of imports of such merchandise on prices, the Commission shall consider whether—
(I)there has been significant price underselling by the imported merchandise as compared with the price of domestic like products of the United States, and
(II)the effect of imports of such merchandise otherwise depresses prices to a significant degree or prevents price increases, which otherwise would have occurred, to a significant degree.
(iii)In examining the impact required to be considered under subparagraph (B)(i)(III), the Commission shall evaluate all relevant economic factors which have a bearing on the state of the industry in the United States, including, but not limited to—
(I)actual and potential decline in output, sales, market share, gross profits, operating profits, net profits, ability to service debt, productivity, return on investments, return on assets, and utilization of capacity,
(II)factors affecting domestic prices,
(III)actual and potential negative effects on cash flow, inventories, employment, wages, growth, ability to raise capital, and investment,
(IV)actual and potential negative effects on the existing development and production efforts of the domestic industry, including efforts to develop a derivative or more advanced version of the domestic like product, and
(V)in a proceeding under part II of this subtitle, the magnitude of the margin of dumping.
(iv)If domestic producers internally transfer significant production of the domestic like product for the production of a downstream article and sell significant production of the domestic like product in the merchant market, and the Commission finds that—
(I)the domestic like product produced that is internally transferred for processing into that downstream article does not enter the merchant market for the domestic like product, and
(II)the domestic like product is the predominant material input in the production of that downstream article,
(D)(i)The Commission shall not determine that there is no material injury or threat of material injury to United States producers of an agricultural commodity merely because the prevailing market price is at or above the minimum support price.
(ii)In the case of agricultural products, the Commission shall consider any increased burden on government income or price support programs.
(E)For purposes of this paragraph—
(i)In determining whether there is a threat of material injury, the Commission shall consider information provided to it by the administering authority regarding the nature of the countervailable subsidy granted by a foreign country (particularly whether the countervailable subsidy is a subsidy described in Article 3 or 6.1 of the Subsidies Agreement) and the effects likely to be caused by the countervailable subsidy.
(ii)The presence or absence of any factor which the Commission is required to evaluate under subparagraph (C) or (D) shall not necessarily give decisive guidance with respect to the determination by the Commission of material injury.
(F)(i)In determining whether an industry in the United States is threatened with material injury by reason of imports (or sales for importation) of the subject merchandise, the Commission shall consider, among other relevant economic factors—
(I)if a countervailable subsidy is involved, such information as may be presented to it by the administering authority as to the nature of the subsidy (particularly as to whether the countervailable subsidy is a subsidy described in Article 3 or 6.1 of the Subsidies Agreement), and whether imports of the subject merchandise are likely to increase,
(II)any existing unused production capacity or imminent, substantial increase in production capacity in the exporting country indicating the likelihood of substantially increased imports of the subject merchandise into the United States, taking into account the availability of other export markets to absorb any additional exports,
(III)a significant rate of increase of the volume or market penetration of imports of the subject merchandise indicating the likelihood of substantially increased imports,
(IV)whether imports of the subject merchandise are entering at prices that are likely to have a significant depressing or suppressing effect on domestic prices, and are likely to increase demand for further imports,
(V)inventories of the subject merchandise,
(VI)the potential for product-shifting if production facilities in the foreign country, which can be used to produce the subject merchandise, are currently being used to produce other products,
(VII)in any investigation under this subtitle which involves imports of both a raw agricultural product (within the meaning of paragraph (4)(E)(iv)) and any product processed from such raw agricultural product, the likelihood that there will be increased imports, by reason of product shifting, if there is an affirmative determination by the Commission under section 1671d(b)(1) or 1673d(b)(1) of this title with respect to either the raw agricultural product or the processed agricultural product (but not both),
(VIII)the actual and potential negative effects on the existing development and production efforts of the domestic industry, including efforts to develop a derivative or more advanced version of the domestic like product, and
(IX)any other demonstrable adverse trends that indicate the probability that there is likely to be material injury by reason of imports (or sale for importation) of the subject merchandise (whether or not it is actually being imported at the time).
(ii)The Commission shall consider the factors set forth in clause (i) as a whole in making a determination of whether further dumped or subsidized imports are imminent and whether material injury by reason of imports would occur unless an order is issued or a suspension agreement is accepted under this subtitle. The presence or absence of any factor which the Commission is required to consider under clause (i) shall not necessarily give decisive guidance with respect to the determination. Such a determination may not be made on the basis of mere conjecture or supposition.
(iii)(I)In investigations under part II of this subtitle, the Commission shall consider whether dumping in the markets of foreign countries (as evidenced by dumping findings or antidumping remedies in other WTO member markets against the same class or kind of merchandise manufactured or exported by the same party as under investigation) suggests a threat of material injury to the domestic industry. In the course of its investigation, the Commission shall request information from the foreign manufacturer, exporter, or United States importer concerning this issue.
(II)For purposes of this clause, the term “WTO member market” means the market of any country which is a WTO member.
(III)For purposes of this clause, the European Communities shall be treated as a foreign country.
(G)(i)For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (C), and subject to clause (ii), the Commission shall cumulatively assess the volume and effect of imports of the subject merchandise from all countries with respect to which—
(I)petitions were filed under section 1671a(b) or 1673a(b) of this title on the same day,
(II)investigations were initiated under section 1671a(a) or 1673a(a) of this title on the same day, or
(III)petitions were filed under section 1671a(b) or 1673a(b) of this title and investigations were initiated under section 1671a(a) or 1673a(a) of this title on the same day,
(ii)The Commission shall not cumulatively assess the volume and effect of imports under clause (i)—
(I)with respect to which the administering authority has made a preliminary negative determination, unless the administering authority subsequently made a final affirmative determination with respect to those imports before the Commission’s final determination is made;
(II)from any country with respect to which the investigation has been terminated;
(III)from any country designated as a beneficiary country under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) for purposes of making a determination with respect to that country, except that the volume and effect of imports of the subject merchandise from such country may be cumulatively assessed with imports of the subject merchandise from any other country designated as such a beneficiary country to the extent permitted by clause (i); or
(IV)from any country that is a party to an agreement with the United States establishing a free trade area, which entered into force and effect before January 1, 1987, unless the Commission determines that a domestic industry is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports from that country.
(iii)In each final determination in which it cumulatively assesses the volume and effect of imports under clause (i), the Commission shall make its determinations based on the record compiled in the first investigation in which it makes a final determination, except that when the administering authority issues its final determination in a subsequently completed investigation, the Commission shall permit the parties in the subsequent investigation to submit comments concerning the significance of the administering authority’s final determination, and shall include such comments and the administering authority’s final determination in the record for the subsequent investigation.
(iv)In an investigation which involves a regional industry, and in which the Commission decides that the volume and effect of imports should be cumulatively assessed under this subparagraph, such assessment shall be based upon the volume and effect of imports into the region or regions determined by the Commission. The provisions of clause (iii) shall apply to such investigations.
(H)To the extent practicable and subject to subparagraph (G)(ii), for purposes of clause (i)(III) and (IV) of subparagraph (F), the Commission may cumulatively assess the volume and price effects of imports of the subject merchandise from all countries with respect to which—
(i)petitions were filed under section 1671a(b) or 1673a(b) of this title on the same day,
(ii)investigations were initiated under section 1671a(a) or 1673a(a) of this title on the same day, or
(iii)petitions were filed under section 1671a(b) or 1673a(b) of this title and investigations were initiated under section 1671a(a) or 1673a(a) of this title on the same day,
(I)The Commission shall consider whether any change in the volume, price effects, or impact of imports of the subject merchandise since the filing of the petition in an investigation under part I or II of this subtitle is related to the pendency of the investigation and, if so, the Commission may reduce the weight accorded to the data for the period after the filing of the petition in making its determination of material injury, threat of material injury, or material retardation of the establishment of an industry in the United States.
(J)The Commission may not determine that there is no material injury or threat of material injury to an industry in the United States merely because that industry is profitable or because the performance of that industry has recently improved.
(8)(A)The term “Subsidies Agreement” means the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures referred to in section 3511(d)(12) of this title.
(B)The term “Agreement on Agriculture” means the Agreement on Agriculture referred to in section 3511(d)(2) of this title.
(9)The term “interested party” means—
(A)a foreign manufacturer, producer, or exporter, or the United States importer, of subject merchandise or a trade or business association a majority of the members of which are producers, exporters, or importers of such merchandise,
(B)the government of a country in which such merchandise is produced or manufactured or from which such merchandise is exported,
(C)a manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler in the United States of a domestic like product,
(D)a certified union or recognized union or group of workers which is representative of an industry engaged in the manufacture, production, or wholesale in the United States of a domestic like product,
(E)a trade or business association a majority of whose members manufacture, produce, or wholesale a domestic like product in the United States,
(F)an association, a majority of whose members is composed of interested parties described in subparagraph (C), (D), or (E) with respect to a domestic like product, and
(G)in any investigation under this subtitle involving an industry engaged in producing a processed agricultural product, as defined in paragraph (4)(E), a coalition or trade association which is representative of either—
(i)processors,
(ii)processors and producers, or
(iii)processors and growers,
(10)The term “domestic like product” means a product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation under this subtitle.
(11)If the Commissioners voting on a determination by the Commission, including a determination under section 1675 of this title, are evenly divided as to whether the determination should be affirmative or negative, the Commission shall be deemed to have made an affirmative determination. For the purpose of applying this paragraph when the issue before the Commission is to determine whether there is—
(A)material injury to an industry in the United States,
(B)threat of material injury to such an industry, or
(C)material retardation of the establishment of an industry in the United States,
(12)For purposes of part I of this subtitle, merchandise shall be treated as the product of the country in which it was manufactured or produced without regard to whether it is imported directly from that country and without regard to whether it is imported in the same condition as when exported from that country or in a changed condition by reason of remanufacture or otherwise.
(13)
(14)The term “sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale” means sold or, in the absence of sales, offered—
(A)to all purchasers in commercial quantities, or
(B)in the ordinary course of trade to one or more selected purchasers in commercial quantities at a price which fairly reflects the market value of the merchandise,
(15)The term “ordinary course of trade” means the conditions and practices which, for a reasonable time prior to the exportation of the subject merchandise, have been normal in the trade under consideration with respect to merchandise of the same class or kind. The administering authority shall consider the following sales and transactions, among others, to be outside the ordinary course of trade:
(A)Sales disregarded under section 1677b(b)(1) of this title.
(B)Transactions disregarded under section 1677b(f)(2) of this title.
(C)Situations in which the administering authority determines that the particular market situation prevents a proper comparison with the export price or constructed export price.
(16)The term “foreign like product” means merchandise in the first of the following categories in respect of which a determination for the purposes of part II of this subtitle can be satisfactorily made:
(A)The subject merchandise and other merchandise which is identical in physical characteristics with, and was produced in the same country by the same person as, that merchandise.
(B)Merchandise—
(i)produced in the same country and by the same person as the subject merchandise,
(ii)like that merchandise in component material or materials and in the purposes for which used, and
(iii)approximately equal in commercial value to that merchandise.
(C)Merchandise—
(i)produced in the same country and by the same person and of the same general class or kind as the subject merchandise,
(ii)like that merchandise in the purposes for which used, and
(iii)which the administering authority determines may reasonably be compared with that merchandise.
(17)The term “usual commercial quantities”, in any case in which the subject merchandise is sold in the market under consideration at different prices for different quantities, means the quantities in which such merchandise is there sold at the price or prices for one quantity in an aggregate volume which is greater than the aggregate volume sold at the price or prices for any other quantity.
(18)(A)The term “nonmarket economy country” means any foreign country that the administering authority determines does not operate on market principles of cost or pricing structures, so that sales of merchandise in such country do not reflect the fair value of the merchandise.
(B)In making determinations under subparagraph (A) the administering authority shall take into account—
(i)the extent to which the currency of the foreign country is convertible into the currency of other countries; 11 So in original. The semicolon probably should be a comma.
(ii)the extent to which wage rates in the foreign country are determined by free bargaining between labor and management,
(iii)the extent to which joint ventures or other investments by firms of other foreign countries are permitted in the foreign country,
(iv)the extent of government ownership or control of the means of production,
(v)the extent of government control over the allocation of resources and over the price and output decisions of enterprises, and
(vi)such other factors as the administering authority considers appropriate.
(C)(i)Any determination that a foreign country is a nonmarket economy country shall remain in effect until revoked by the administering authority.
(ii)The administering authority may make a determination under subparagraph (A) with respect to any foreign country at any time.
(D)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any determination made by the administering authority under subparagraph (A) shall not be subject to judicial review in any investigation conducted under part II of this subtitle.
(E)Upon request by the administering authority, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall provide the administering authority a copy of all public and proprietary information submitted to, or obtained by, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection that the administering authority considers relevant to proceedings involving merchandise from nonmarket economy countries. The administering authority shall protect proprietary information obtained under this section from public disclosure in accordance with section 1677f of this title.
(19)In determining whether a lease is equivalent to a sale for purposes of this subtitle, the administering authority shall consider—
(A)the terms of the lease,
(B)commercial practice within the industry,
(C)the circumstances of the transaction,
(D)whether the product subject to the lease is integrated into the operations of the lessee or importer,
(E)whether in practice there is a likelihood that the lease will be continued or renewed for a significant period of time, and
(F)other relevant factors, including whether the lease transaction would permit avoidance of antidumping or countervailing duties.
(20)(A)Except as otherwise provided by this paragraph, merchandise imported by, or for the use of, a department or agency of the United States Government (including merchandise provided for under chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) is subject to the imposition of countervailing duties or antidumping duties under this subtitle or section 1303 of this title.
(B)Merchandise imported by, or for the use of, the Department of Defense shall not be subject to the imposition of countervailing or antidumping duties under this subtitle if—
(i)the merchandise is acquired by, or for use of, such Department—
(I)from a country with which such Department had a Memorandum of Understanding which was in effect on January 1, 1988, and has continued to have a comparable agreement (including renewals) or superceding agreements, and
(II)in accordance with terms of the Memorandum of Understanding in effect at the time of importation, or
(ii)the merchandise has no substantial nonmilitary use.
(21)The term “United States-Canada Agreement” means the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement.
(22)The term “USMCA” has the meaning given that term in section 4502 of this title.
(23)The term “entry” includes, in appropriate circumstances as determined by the administering authority, a reconciliation entry created under a reconciliation process, defined in section 1401(s) of this title, that is initiated by an importer. The liability of an importer under an antidumping or countervailing duty proceeding for entries of merchandise subject to the proceeding will attach to the corresponding reconciliation entry or entries. Suspension of liquidation of the reconciliation entry or entries, for the purpose of enforcing this subtitle, is equivalent to the suspension of liquidation of the corresponding individual entries; but the suspension of liquidation of the reconciliation entry or entries for such purpose does not preclude liquidation for any other purpose.
(24)(A)(i)Except as provided in clauses (ii) and (iv), imports from a country of merchandise corresponding to a domestic like product identified by the Commission are “negligible” if such imports account for less than 3 percent of the volume of all such merchandise imported into the United States in the most recent 12-month period for which data are available that precedes—
(I)the filing of the petition under section 1671a(b) or 1673a(b) of this title, or
(II)the initiation of the investigation, if the investigation was initiated under section 1671a(a) or 1673a(a) of this title.
(ii)Imports that would otherwise be negligible under clause (i) shall not be negligible if the aggregate volume of imports of the merchandise from all countries described in clause (i) with respect to which investigations were initiated on the same day exceeds 7 percent of the volume of all such merchandise imported into the United States during the applicable 12-month period.
(iii)In determining aggregate volume under clause (ii) or (iv), the Commission shall not consider imports from any country specified in paragraph (7)(G)(ii).
(iv)Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (ii), the Commission shall not treat imports as negligible if it determines that there is a potential that imports from a country described in clause (i) will imminently account for more than 3 percent of the volume of all such merchandise imported into the United States, or that the aggregate volumes of imports from all countries described in clause (ii) will imminently exceed 7 percent of the volume of all such merchandise imported into the United States. The Commission shall consider such imports only for purposes of determining threat of material injury.
(B)In the case of an investigation under section 1671 of this title, subparagraph (A) shall be applied to imports of subject merchandise from developing countries by substituting “4 percent” for “3 percent” in subparagraph (A)(i) and by substituting “9 percent” for “7 percent” in subparagraph (A)(ii).
(C)In computing import volumes for purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B), the Commission may make reasonable estimates on the basis of available statistics.
(D)In an investigation in which the Commission makes a regional industry determination under paragraph (4)(C), the Commission’s examination under subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall be based upon the volume of subject merchandise exported for sale in the regional market in lieu of the volume of all subject merchandise imported into the United States.
(25)The term “subject merchandise” means the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of an investigation, a review, a suspension agreement, an order under this subtitle or section 1303 of this title, or a finding under the Antidumping Act, 1921.
(26)The terms “section 1303” and “1303” mean section 1303 of this title as in effect on the day before the effective date of title II of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.
(27)The term “suspension agreement” means an agreement described in section 1671c(b), 1671c(c), 1673c(b), 1673c(c), or 1673c(l) of this title.
(28)The term “exporter or producer” means the exporter of the subject merchandise, the producer of the subject merchandise, or both where appropriate. For purposes of section 1677b of this title, the term “exporter or producer” includes both the exporter of the subject merchandise and the producer of the same subject merchandise to the extent necessary to accurately calculate the total amount incurred and realized for costs, expenses, and profits in connection with production and sale of that merchandise.
(29)The term “WTO Agreement” means the Agreement defined in section 3501(9) of this title.
(30)The terms “WTO member” and “WTO member country” mean a state, or separate customs territory (within the meaning of Article XII of the WTO Agreement), with respect to which the United States applies the WTO Agreement.
(31)The term “GATT 1994” means the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade annexed to the WTO Agreement.
(32)The term “Trade Representative” means the United States Trade Representative.
(33)The following persons shall be considered to be “affiliated” or “affiliated persons”:
(A)Members of a family, including brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half blood), spouse, ancestors, and lineal descendants.
(B)Any officer or director of an organization and such organization.
(C)Partners.
(D)Employer and employee.
(E)Any person directly or indirectly owning, controlling, or holding with power to vote, 5 percent or more of the outstanding voting stock or shares of any organization and such organization.
(F)Two or more persons directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, any person.
(G)Any person who controls any other person and such other person.
(34)The terms “dumped” and “dumping” refer to the sale or likely sale of goods at less than fair value.
(35)(A)The term “dumping margin” means the amount by which the normal value exceeds the export price or constructed export price of the subject merchandise.
(B)The term “weighted average dumping margin” is the percentage determined by dividing the aggregate dumping margins determined for a specific exporter or producer by the aggregate export prices and constructed export prices of such exporter or producer.
(C)The magnitude of the margin of dumping used by the Commission shall be—
(i)in making a preliminary determination under section 1673b(a) of this title in an investigation (including any investigation in which the Commission cumulatively assesses the volume and effect of imports under paragraph (7)(G)(i)), the dumping margin or margins published by the administering authority in its notice of initiation of the investigation;
(ii)in making a final determination under section 1673d(b) of this title, the dumping margin or margins most recently published by the administering authority prior to the closing of the Commission’s administrative record;
(iii)in a review under section 1675(b)(2) of this title, the most recent dumping margin or margins determined by the administering authority under section 1675a(c)(3) of this title, if any, or under section 1673b(b) or 1673d(a) of this title; and
(iv)in a review under section 1675(c) of this title, the dumping margin or margins determined by the administering authority under section 1675a(c)(3) of this title.
(36)(A)The term “developing country” means a country designated as a developing country by the Trade Representative.
(B)The term “least developed country” means a country which the Trade Representative determines is—
(i)a country referred to as a least developed country within the meaning of paragraph (a) of Annex VII to the Subsidies Agreement, or
(ii)any other country listed in Annex VII to the Subsidies Agreement, but only if the country has a per capita gross national product of less than $1,000 per annum as measured by the most recent data available from the World Bank.
(C)The Trade Representative shall publish in the Federal Register, and update as necessary, a list of—
(i)developing countries that have eliminated their export subsidies on an expedited basis within the meaning of Article 27.11 of the Subsidies Agreement, and
(ii)countries determined by the Trade Representative to be least developed or developing countries.
(D)In determining whether a country is a developing country under subparagraph (A), the Trade Representative shall consider such economic, trade, and other factors which the Trade Representative considers appropriate, including the level of economic development of such country (the assessment of which shall include a review of the country’s per capita gross national product) and the country’s share of world trade.
(E)A determination that a country is a developing or least developed country pursuant to this paragraph shall be for purposes of this subtitle only and shall not affect the determination of a country’s status as a developing or least developed country with respect to any other law.
Legislative History
Notes & Related Subsidiaries
Amendment of SectionFor termination of amendment by section 501(c) of Pub. L. 100–449, see Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, referred to in par. (7)(G)(ii)(III), is title II of Pub. L. 98–67, Aug. 5, 1983, 97 Stat. 384, which is classified principally to chapter 15 (§ 2701 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title
note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables. The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, referred to in par. (20)(A), is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under section 1202 of this title. section 1303 of this title, referred to in pars. (20)(A), (25), and (26), was repealed, effective Jan. 1, 1995, by Pub. L. 103–465, title II, § 261(a), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4908. For
Savings Provision
s and treatment of references to section 1303 in other laws, see section 261(b), (d)(1)(C) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as notes under section 1303 of this title. The Antidumping Act, 1921, referred to in par. (25), is act
May 27, 1921, ch. 14, title II, 42 Stat. 11, which was classified generally to sections 160 to 171 of this title, and was repealed by Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 106(a),
July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 193. For the
Effective Date
of title II of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, referred to in par. (26), as Jan. 1, 1995, see
Effective Date
of 1994 Amendment note set out under section 1671 of this title.
Amendments
2020—Par. (22). Pub. L. 116–113 added par. (22) and struck out former par. (22) which defined “NAFTA” as the North American Free Trade Agreement. 2015—Par. (7)(C)(iii)(I). Pub. L. 114–27, § 503(b), amended subcl. (I) generally. Prior to amendment, subcl. (I) read as follows: “actual and potential decline in output, sales, market share, profits, productivity, return on investments, and utilization of capacity,”. Par. (7)(C)(iv)(I) to (III). Pub. L. 114–27, § 503(c), inserted “and” at end of subcl. (I), struck out “and” after comma at end of subcl. (II), and struck out subcl. (III) which read as follows: “the production of the domestic like product sold in the merchant market is not generally used in the production of that downstream article,”. Par. (7)(J). Pub. L. 114–27, § 503(a), added subpar. (J). Par. (15)(C). Pub. L. 114–27, § 504(a), added subpar. (C). 1996—Par. (16)(C)(i). Pub. L. 104–295, § 20(b)(7), which directed substitution of “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of the investigation” in subpar. (B)(i), was executed by making the substitution in subpar. (C)(i) to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Par. (30). Pub. L. 104–295, § 20(b)(14), substituted “Agreement” for “agreement” after “applies the WTO”. 1994—Par. (1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(b)(2), substituted “Secretary of Commerce” for “Secretary of the Treasury”. Par. (4)(A). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(a)(1), amended heading and text of subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The term ‘industry’ means the domestic producers as a whole of a like product, or those producers whose collective output of the like product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of that product; except that in the case of wine and grape products subject to investigation under this subtitle, the term also means the domestic producers of the principal raw agricultural product (determined on either a volume or value basis) which is included in the like domestic product, if those producers allege material injury, or threat of material injury, as a result of imports of such wine and grape products.” Par. (4)(B). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(a)(1), amended heading and text of subpar. (B) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “When some producers are related to the exporters or importers, or are themselves importers of the allegedly subsidized or dumped merchandise, the term ‘industry’ may be applied in appropriate circumstances by excluding such producers from those included in that industry.” Par. (4)(C). Pub. L. 103–465, § 270(c)(2), in concluding provisions, substituted “dumped imports or imports of merchandise benefiting from a countervailable subsidy” for “subsidized or dumped imports” in two places. Pub. L. 103–465, §§ 222(a)(2), 233(a)(3)(A)(i), substituted “domestic like product” for “like product” in cl. (i) and concluding provisions, and inserted at end of concluding provisions “The term ‘regional industry’ means the domestic producers within a region who are treated as a separate industry under this subparagraph.” Par. (4)(D). Pub. L. 103–465, §§ 233(a)(3)(A)(i), 270(c)(2), substituted “domestic like product” for “like product” wherever appearing and “dumped imports or imports of merchandise benefiting from a countervailable subsidy” for “subsidized or dumped imports” in two places. Pars. (5) to (5B). Pub. L. 103–465, § 251(a), added pars. (5) to (5B), and struck out former par. (5) which defined “subsidy”. Par. (6). Pub. L. 103–465, § 251(b), inserted “countervailable” before “subsidy” wherever appearing in heading and text. Par. (7)(B)(i)(I). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(5)(BB), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of the investigation”. Par. (7)(B)(i)(II), (III), (C)(ii)(I). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(3)(B), substituted “domestic like products” for “like products”. Par. (7)(C)(iii). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(b)(3), substituted “subparagraph (B)(i)(III)” for “subparagraph (B)(iii)” in introductory provisions. Par. (7)(C)(iii)(IV). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(3)(A)(ii), substituted “domestic like product” for “like product”. Par. (7)(C)(iii)(V). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(b)(1), added subcl. (V). Par. (7)(C)(iv). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(b)(2), added cl. (iv) and struck out former cl. (iv) which directed that Commission cumulatively assess volume and effect of imports from two or more countries of like products subject to investigation if such imports compete with each other and with like products of domestic industry in United States market, with an exception for imports which are products of country designated as beneficiary country under Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act. Par. (7)(C)(v). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(d)(1), struck out heading and text of cl. (v). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The Commission is not required to apply clause (iv) or subparagraph (F)(iv) in any case in which the Commission determines that imports of the merchandise subject to investigation are negligible and have no discernable adverse impact on the domestic industry. For purposes of making such determination, the Commission shall evaluate all relevant economic factors regarding the imports, including, but not limited to, whether— “(I) the volume and market share of the imports are negligible, “(II) sales transactions involving the imports are isolated and sporadic, and “(III) the domestic market for the like product is price sensitive by reason of the nature of the product, so that a small quantity of imports can result in price suppression or depression. For purposes of this clause, the Commission may treat as negligible and having no discernable adverse impact on the domestic industry imports that are the product of any country that is a party to a free trade area agreement with the United States which entered into force and effect before January 1, 1987, if the Commission determines that the domestic industry is not being materially injured by reason of such imports.” Par. (7)(E)(i). Pub. L. 103–465, § 266, amended heading and text of cl. (i) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “In determining whether there is a threat of material injury, the Commission shall consider such information as may be presented to it by the administering authority as to the nature of the subsidy (particularly as to whether the subsidy is an export subsidy inconsistent with the Agreement) provided by a foreign country and the effects likely to be caused by the subsidy.” Par. (7)(F)(i), (ii). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(c), amended cls. (i) and (ii) generally, substituting present provisions for provisions which listed factors in determining as well as basis for determining that an industry is threatened with material injury by reason of imports (or sales for importation) of the subject merchandise. Par. (7)(F)(iii)(I), (II). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(b)(1)(A), in subcl. (I), substituted “WTO member” for “GATT member”, and in subcl. (II), substituted “WTO member” for “GATT member” in heading and text before “market”, and “WTO member.” for “signatory to The Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (relating to antidumping measures).” Par. (7)(F)(iv). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(e)(1), struck out heading and text of cl. (iv). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “To the extent practicable and subject to subparagraph (C)(iv)(II) and (v), for purposes of clause (i)(III) and (IV) the Commission may cumulatively assess the volume and price effects of imports from two or more countries if such imports— “(I) compete with each other, and with like products of the domestic industry, in the United States market, and “(II) are subject to any investigation under section 1303, 1671, or 1673 of this title.” Par. (7)(G), (H). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(e)(2), added subpars. (G) and (H). Par. (7)(I). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(f), added subpar. (I). Par. (8). Pub. L. 103–465, § 270(e), amended heading and text of par. (8) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The terms ‘Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’ and ‘Agreement’ mean the Agreement on Interpretation and Application of Articles VI, XVI, and XXIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (relating to subsidies and countervailing measures) approved under section 2503(a) of this title.” Par. (9)(A). Pub. L. 103–465, §§ 222(g)(1), 233(a)(5)(CC), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of an investigation under this subtitle” and inserted “producers, exporters, or” before “importers”. Par. (9)(B). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(g)(2), inserted “or from which such merchandise is exported” after “manufactured”. Par. (9)(C) to (F). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(3)(A)(iii), substituted “domestic like product” for “like product”. Par. (10). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(3)(A)(iii), substituted “domestic like product” for “like product” in heading and text. Par. (11). Pub. L. 103–465, § 221(b), inserted “, including a determination under section 1675 of this title,” after “determination by the Commission” in introductory provisions. Par. (13). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(i)(2), struck out heading and text of par. (13). Text read as follows: “For the purpose of determining United States price, the term ‘exporter’ includes the person by whom or for whose account the merchandise is imported into the United States if— “(A) such person is the agent or principal of the exporter, manufacturer, or producer; “(B) such person owns or controls, directly or indirectly, through stock ownership or control or otherwise, any interest in the business of the exporter, manufacturer, or producer; “(C) the exporter, manufacturer, or producer owns or controls, directly or indirectly, through stock ownership or control or otherwise, any interest in any business conducted by such person; or “(D) any person or persons, jointly or severally, directly or indirectly, through stock ownership or control or otherwise, own or control in the aggregate 20 percent or more of the voting power or control in the business carried on by the person by whom or for whose account the merchandise is imported into the United States, and also 20 percent or more of such power or control in the business of the exporter, manufacturer, or producer.” Par. (15). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(h), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of an investigation” and inserted at end “The administering authority shall consider the following sales and transactions, among others, to be outside the ordinary course of trade: “(A) Sales disregarded under section 1677b(b)(1) of this title. “(B) Transactions disregarded under section 1677b(f)(2) of this title.” Par. (16). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(4), substituted “Foreign like product” for “Such or similar merchandise” as heading and “foreign like product” for “such or similar merchandise” in introductory provisions. Par. (16)(A). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(5)(DD), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of an investigation”. Par. (16)(B)(i). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(5)(EE), which directed the substitution of “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of an investigation”, was executed by making the substitution for text which contained the words “the investigation” rather than “an investigation”, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Par. (17). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(5)(FF), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of the investigation”. Par. (24). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(d)(2), added par. (24). Pars. (25) to (34). Pub. L. 103–465, § 222(i)(1), added pars. (25) to (34). Par. (35). Pub. L. 103–465, § 229(b), added par. (35). Par. (36). Pub. L. 103–465, § 267, added par. (36). 1993—Pars. (18), (21). Pub. L. 103–182, § 412(b)(1), redesignated par. (18), relating to United States-Canada Agreement, as (21). Par. (22). Pub. L. 103–182, § 412(b)(2), added (22). Par. (23). Pub. L. 103–182, § 637(b), added par. (23). 1990—Par. (7)(C)(iv). Pub. L. 101–382, § 224(a), amended cl. (iv) generally. Prior to amendment, cl. (iv) read as follows: “For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii), the Commission shall cumulatively assess the volume and effect of imports from two or more countries of like products subject to investigation if such imports compete with each other and with like products of the domestic industry in the United States market.” Par. (7)(F)(iv). Pub. L. 101–382, § 224(b), substituted “(C)(iv)(II) and (v)” for “(C)(v)”. Par. (20)(A). Pub. L. 101–382, § 139(a)(3), substituted “chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule” for “schedule 8 of the Tariff Schedules”. 1988—Par. (4)(E). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1326(a), added subpar. (E). Par. (5). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1312, amended par. (5) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (5) read as follows: “The term ‘subsidy’ has the same meaning as the term ‘bounty or grant’ as that term is used in section 1303 of this title, and includes, but is not limited to, the following: “(A) Any export subsidy described in Annex A to the Agreement (relating to illustrative list of export subsidies). “(B) The following domestic subsidies, if provided or required by government action to a specific enterprise or industry, or group of enterprises or industries, whether publicly or privately owned, and whether paid or bestowed directly or indirectly on the manufacture, production, or export of any class or kind of merchandise: “(i) The provision of capital, loans, or loan guarantees on terms inconsistent with commercial considerations. “(ii) The provision of goods or services at preferential rates. “(iii) The grant of funds or forgiveness of debt to cover operating losses sustained by a specific industry. “(iv) The assumption of any costs or expenses of manufacture, production, or distribution.” Par. (7)(B). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1328(1), amended subpar. (B) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (B) read as follows: “In making its determinations under section 1671b(a), 1671d(b), 1673b(a), and 1673d(b) of this title, the Commission shall consider, among other factors— “(i) the volume of imports of the merchandise which is the subject of the investigation, “(ii) the effect of imports of that merchandise on prices in the United States for like products, and “(iii) the impact of imports of such merchandise on domestic producers of like products.” Par. (7)(C). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1328(2), in heading substituted “relevant factors” for “volume and of price effects”, in cl. (ii)(I) substituted “underselling” for “undercutting”, and in cl. (iii) inserted “domestic” in heading and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text of cl. (iii) read as follows: “In examining the impact on the affected industry, the Commission shall evaluate all relevant economic factors which have a bearing on the state of the industry, including, but not limited to— “(I) actual and potential decline in output, sales, market share, profits, productivity, return on investments, and utilization of capacity, “(II) factors affecting domestic prices, and “(III) actual and potential negative effects on cash flow, inventories, employment, wages, growth, ability to raise capital, and investment.” Par. (7)(C)(v). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1330(b), added cl. (v). Par. (7)(F)(i)(IX). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1326(b), which directed that par. (7)(F) be amended by adding subcl. (IX), was executed by adding subcl. (IX) to par. (7)(F)(i) to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Par. (7)(F)(i)(X). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1329(1)–(3), added subcl. (X). Par. (7)(F)(iii). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1329(4), added cl. (iii). Par. (7)(F)(iv). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1330(a), added cl. (iv). Par. (9)(G). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1326(c), added subpar. (G). Par. (18). Pub. L. 100–449 temporarily added par. (18) relating to United States-Canada Agreement. See Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below. Pub. L. 100–418, § 1316(b), added par. (18) relating to nonmarket economy country. Par. (19). Pub. L. 100–647 redesignated par. (19), relating to application to governmental importations, as (20). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1335, added par. (19) relating to application to governmental importations. Pub. L. 100–418, § 1327, added par. (19) relating to equivalency of leases to sales. Par. (20). Pub. L. 100–647 redesignated par. (19), relating to application to governmental importations, as (20). 1986—Par. (7)(F)(i). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “the merchandise” for “any merchandise” in introductory provisions and “final orders” for “find orders” in subcl. (VIII). 1984—Par. (4)(A). Pub. L. 98–573, § 612(a)(1), inserted provision that in the case of wine and grape products subject to investigation under this subtitle, the term also means the domestic producers of the principal raw agricultural product (determined on either a volume or value basis) which is included in the like domestic product, if those producers allege material injury, or threat of material injury, as a result of imports of such wine and grape products. Par. (7)(C)(iv). Pub. L. 98–623, § 612(a)(2)(A), added cl. (iv). Par. (7)(F). Pub. L. 98–573, § 612(a)(2)(B), added subpar. (F). Par. (9)(F). Pub. L. 98–573, § 612(a)(3), added subpar. (F). Par. (14)(A), (B). Pub. L. 98–573, § 612(a)(4), substituted “in commercial quantities” for “at wholesale”. Par. (17). Pub. L. 98–573, § 612(a)(5), substituted “commercial quantities” for “wholesale quantities”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of Name
“Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection” substituted for “Commissioner of Customs” in two places in par. (18)(E) on authority of section 802(d)(2) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
Effective Date
of 2020 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date on which the USMCA enters into force (July 1, 2020), but not applicable to certain determinations under section 1516a of this title or binational panel reviews under NAFTA, see section 432 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under section 1516a of this title.
Effective Date
of 1994 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Effective Date
of 1993 AmendmentAmendment by section 412(b) of Pub. L. 103–182 effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1994], but not applicable to any final determination described in section 1516a(a)(1)(B) or (2)(B)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this title, notice of which is published in the Federal Register before such date, or to a determination described in section 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vi) of this title, notice of which is received by the Government of Canada or Mexico before such date, or to any binational panel review under the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement, or to any extraordinary challenge arising out of any such review that was commenced before such date, see section 416 of Pub. L. 103–182, formerly set out as an
Effective Date
note under former section 3431 of this title.
Effective Date
of 1990 Amendment Pub. L. 101–382, title II, § 224(c), Aug. 20, 1990, 104 Stat. 660, provided that: “The
Amendments
made by subsections (a) and (b) [amending this section] apply with respect to investigations (including investigations regarding products of Canadian origin) initiated under section 702 or 732 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [19 U.S.C. 1671a, 1673a] on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 20, 1990].” Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 100–647 applicable as if such amendment took effect on Aug. 23, 1988, see section 9001(b) of Pub. L. 100–647, set out as a note under section 58c of this title. Amendment by Pub. L. 100–449 effective on date United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement enters into force (Jan. 1, 1989), and to cease to have effect on date Agreement ceases to be in force, see section 501(a), (c) of Pub. L. 100–449, set out in a note under section 2112 of this title. Amendment by section 1312, 1316(b), 1326(a)–(c), and 1327–1329 of Pub. L. 100–418 applicable with respect to investigations initiated after Aug. 23, 1988, and to reviews initiated under section 1673e(c) or 1675 of this title after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1337(b) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as an
Effective Date
of 1988 Amendment note under section 1671 of this title. Amendment by section 1330 of Pub. L. 100–418 applicable with respect to investigations initiated after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1337(c) of Pub. L. 100–418. Amendment by section 1335 of Pub. L. 100–418 applicable with respect to entries, and withdrawals from warehouse for consumption, that are liquidated on or after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 1337(e) of Pub. L. 100–418. Effective and Termination Dates of 1984 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 98–573 applicable with respect to investigations initiated by petition or by the administering authority under parts I and II of this subtitle, and to reviews begun under section 1675 of this title, on or after Oct. 30, 1984; but provisions of this subtitle not to be interpreted to prevent refiling of a petition under section 1671a or 1673a of this title that was filed before Oct. 30, 1984, if the purpose of refiling was to avail petitioner of amendment of par. (4)(A) of this section by Pub. L. 98–573, and such amendment of par. (4)(A) inapplicable to petitions filed (or refiled) under section 1671a or 1673a of this title after Sept. 30, 1986, see section 626(b)(1), (c)(1), (2) of Pub. L. 98–573, as amended, set out as an
Effective Date
of 1984 Amendment note under section 1671 of this title.
Effective Date
Part effective Jan. 1, 1980, see section 107 of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
Transfer of Functions
For
Transfer of Functions
, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see section 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6. Effect of Termination of USMCA Country StatusFor provisions relating to effect of termination of USMCA country status on sections 401 to 432 of Pub. L. 116–113, see section 4601 of this title. Plan
Amendments
Not Required Until January 1, 1989For provisions directing that if any
Amendments
made by subtitle A or subtitle C of title XI [§§ 1101–1147 and 1171–1177] or title XVIII [§§ 1801–1899A] of Pub. L. 99–514 require an amendment to any plan, such plan amendment shall not be required to be made before the first plan year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1989, see section 1140 of Pub. L. 99–514, as amended, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Executive Documents
Transfer of Functions
All functions of the Secretary of the Treasury under this subtitle were transferred to the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1979, § 5(a)(1)(C), 44 F.R. 69275, 93 Stat. 1381, eff. Jan. 2, 1980, as provided by section 1–107(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12188, Jan. 2, 1980, 45 F.R. 993, set out as notes under section 2171 of this title, except that the Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury was to accept such deposits, bonds, or other security as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Commerce, assess and collect such duties as directed by the Secretary of Commerce, and furnish such of its important records or copies thereof as requested by the Secretary incident to the functions transferred. Uruguay Round Agreements: Entry Into ForceThe Uruguay Round Agreements, including the World Trade Organization Agreement and agreements annexed to that Agreement, as referred to in section 3511(d) of this title, entered into force with respect to the United States on Jan. 1, 1995. See note set out under section 3511 of this title.
Reference
Citations & Metadata
Citation
19 U.S.C. § 1677
Title 19 — Customs Duties
Last Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Release point: 119-73