DOJ Blocks UnitedHealth Merger with Fines and Branch Sales
Published Date: 8/14/2025
Notice
Summary
The U.S. government says UnitedHealth’s plan to buy Amedisys could hurt competition in home health and hospice care. To fix this, both companies must sell some branches to other health providers and Amedisys will pay a $1.1 million fine and train employees on antitrust rules. Public comments on this plan are open for 60 days starting August 14, 2025.
Analyzed Economic Effects
3 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.
Required Divestitures to Preserve Local Competition
The proposed Final Judgment requires UnitedHealth Group and Amedisys to divest certain home health, hospice, and palliative care branches and agencies to BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. and The Pennant Group, Inc., and/or to another acquirer acceptable to the United States. The divestitures are intended to preserve competition in hundreds of local home health and hospice markets that serve Medicare patients.
Merger Found Presumptively Anticompetitive Locally
The government alleges the UnitedHealth–Amedisys merger would be presumptively anticompetitive in hundreds of local home health markets and dozens of hospice markets, including markets where post-merger shares would exceed 75% (e.g., Maryland's Eastern Shore) or 90% (e.g., Parkersburg, West Virginia). The complaint states these markets account for at least $1.6 billion (home health) and $300 million (hospice) in commerce in presumptively unlawful markets.
Amedisys Civil Penalty and Employee Training
Amedisys must pay a $1.1 million civil penalty for violating the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act and must conduct antitrust compliance training for certain Amedisys employees. These obligations are part of the proposed Final Judgment filed with the court.
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-12359 — Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-1EdTech Consortium, Inc.
1EdTech Consortium just updated its membership by adding new members from places like Germany, Chile, India, and several U.S. schools, while some others, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have left. These changes keep the group’s antitrust protections active, meaning members are only responsible for actual damages if legal issues arise. No big money changes or new activities are planned, and membership stays open for more to join anytime.
2026-12353 — Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) just updated its list of tech standards by adding 100 new ones and revising 22 existing ones. These changes help protect companies from big antitrust lawsuits, limiting damages to actual losses. This update keeps IEEE’s innovation safe and sound, with no new costs or deadlines for the public right now.
2026-12366 — Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Information Warfare Research Project Consortium
The Information Warfare Research Project Consortium just updated its team by adding 26 new members and saying goodbye to 9 others. This change helps protect members from big antitrust lawsuits, limiting damages to actual losses. If you’re part of this tech and defense group, keep an eye out for more updates as membership stays open and active.
2026-12365 — Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-ASTM International
ASTM International has updated its list of ongoing projects that help set important standards, and they’ve told the government about these changes to keep antitrust rules fair. This update affects companies and groups involved in creating these standards, ensuring any legal claims about competition are limited to actual damages. The new list covers work started between December 2025 and February 2026, with details available online—no extra costs or deadlines for the public right now.
2026-11658 — United States, et al. v. Taiheiyo Cement Corporation, et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government is stepping in to stop Taiheiyo Cement and CalPortland from buying Vulcan Material’s ready-mix concrete plants in California because it could hurt competition. To keep things fair, the companies must sell off several plants, trucks, and property rights in Escondido, Oceanside, and Lakeside. People have 60 days to share their thoughts before the deal is finalized, keeping the concrete market strong and fair.
2026-11329 — United States et al. v. Agri Stats, Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government is stopping Agri Stats, Inc. from sharing secret pricing info between competing meat companies to keep things fair in chicken, pork, and turkey markets. Agri Stats must now share older, less detailed data publicly and follow new rules to prevent cheating. These changes start soon and will be watched closely by a special monitor to make sure everyone plays by the rules.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2025-15485 — Notice of Request for Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection
USDA Rural Development wants to keep collecting info for their Strategic Economic and Community Development Program. This means folks involved with rural projects will keep sharing important data, with no new costs or big changes. The extension helps keep things running smoothly without extra paperwork headaches.
Next: 2025-15488 — Arts Advisory Panel Meetings
The Arts Advisory Panel will hold one meeting online to discuss important arts topics. This affects artists, arts organizations, and anyone interested in national arts funding and programs. The meeting is a chance to share ideas and help shape future arts support, with no direct cost changes announced.