Feds Fine Heart Valve Firms $12 Million Over Merger
Published Date: 7/23/2026
Notice
Summary
The U.S. government says Edwards LifeSciences broke the rules when it bought JC Medical from Genesis MedTech. Edwards must pay $10 million, Genesis pays $2 million, and Edwards has to get approval before buying any company working on special heart valve devices in the U.S. This keeps the market fair and protects competition in heart health tech.
Analyzed Economic Effects
5 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 4 costs, 0 mixed.
Company Civil Penalties Ordered
The court’s proposed Final Judgment orders Edwards to pay a civil penalty of $10,000,000 and Genesis to pay $2,000,000. Each company must pay the full penalty within thirty (30) days of entry of the Final Judgment, and interest of 18% per year will accrue on any late payment.
Edwards Must Notify Before TAVR-AR Deals
If you run a firm that sells or is conducting clinical trials in the United States for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation (TAVR-AR) device, Edwards must give the Federal Trade Commission advance written Notification before acquiring any ownership interest in your firm. The Notification must use the Appendix to Part 803 Form, be filed with the FTC Secretary (no filing fee), and Edwards must wait at least thirty (30) days before closing (and wait an additional 30 days after any FTC request for more information).
Antitrust Compliance Program Required
Edwards must set up an antitrust compliance program: name an Antitrust Compliance Officer within thirty (30) days; distribute the Final Judgment to officers and key employees within forty-five (45) days; provide training within forty-five (45) days and annually thereafter; obtain written certifications within sixty (60) days and annually; and file annual compliance statements with the United States. The program also requires prompt internal action and reporting if violations are discovered.
DOJ Access and Inspection Rights
The United States may inspect Edwards' books, records, and documents relating to the Final Judgment during business hours and may interview Edwards' officers or employees (with counsel present if desired). Edwards must also supply written reports or interrogatory responses on request, subject to confidentiality rules (confidential designations expire after 10 years unless extended).
Judgment Intended to Protect Competition
The Competitive Impact Statement says the Final Judgment is intended to deter parties from structuring deals to avoid Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) review and that this relief will have a beneficial effect on competition. The United States explains that preventing HSR avoidance protects consumers and competition in the market for TAVR-AR devices.
Personalized for You
How does this regulation affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this federal register document means for your household, plus every other regulation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Key Dates
Department and Agencies
Related Federal Register Documents
2026-14903, United States, et al. v. OhioHealth Corporation; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement
The U.S. government and Ohio are taking on OhioHealth Corporation for using sneaky contract rules that stop insurers from offering cheaper health plans. OhioHealth must now remove these rules and promise not to use them again, helping more budget-friendly options reach patients. People have 60 days to share their thoughts before the court makes it official.
2026-14780, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Mobile Satellite Services Association
The Mobile Satellite Services Association (MSSA) just updated its team by adding Creative5 Inc. from Taiwan and saying goodbye to Simnovus Corporation from North Carolina. These changes keep the group’s special legal protections in place, helping members avoid big antitrust lawsuits except for actual damages. If you’re part of MSSA or thinking about joining, keep an eye out—membership is open and updates will keep coming!
2026-14812, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Expeditionary Missions Consortium-Crane
The Expeditionary Missions Consortium–Crane just added a bunch of new members and said goodbye to one. This update keeps their special legal protections in place, so if anyone tries to sue them over competition issues, they can only claim actual damages. No big money changes or project shifts, and they’ll keep sharing membership updates as they happen.
2026-14803, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Resilient Infrastructure + Secure Energy Consortium
The Resilient Infrastructure + Secure Energy Consortium (RISE) just added nine new members to their team, including companies from New York, North Carolina, and beyond. This update helps protect them from big antitrust lawsuits, limiting damages to actual losses. The group’s work continues as planned, and they’ll keep sharing membership updates as they grow.
2026-14806, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Defense Industrial Based Consortium
The Defense Industrial Based Consortium (DIBC) just updated its membership list, adding lots of new companies from the U.S., Canada, and the UK. This change keeps special legal protections in place that limit how much money can be claimed in antitrust lawsuits. These updates took effect early 2026 and affect all members involved in defense-related research and production.
2026-14786, Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Naval Surface Technology & Innovation Consortium
The Naval Surface Technology & Innovation Consortium (NSTIC) updated its member list, adding lots of new companies from all over the U.S. This change helps protect members from big antitrust lawsuits, limiting damages to actual losses only. These updates were officially filed on January 8, 2026, and keep the consortium’s teamwork strong and legally safe.
Previous / Next Documents
Previous: 2026-14933, Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Borrower Defense to Loan Repayment Universal Forms
The government is updating the forms people use to ask for loan forgiveness if their school misled them. This affects borrowers who want to stop paying their student loans because of bad school behavior. The new forms aim to make the process easier and clearer, with no extra costs or delays expected.
Next: 2026-14936, Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 206(4)-6
The SEC is asking to keep the current rules that require investment advisers to vote client shares in their clients’ best interest and share how they voted. This affects advisers who handle client voting and their clients who want transparency. No big changes or extra costs are coming, but advisers must keep following these clear rules to protect investors.