119-hjres-139119th CongressWALLET

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States requiring a balanced budget for the Federal Government.

Sponsored By: Representative Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

Failed

Summary

This joint resolution would add a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced federal budget. It caps federal spending to recent receipts, raises the bar for tax increases, and creates narrow overrides for emergencies.

Show full summary
  • Caps annual federal expenditures at the average annual receipts from the 3 prior years, adjusted for population and inflation. Payments on the public debt are excluded and borrowing is not counted as receipts.
  • Lets Congress approve specific spending above the cap by a two-thirds roll-call vote in each House. During any year with a declaration of war Congress can also approve excess spending by roll-call vote.
  • Requires any bill that creates a new tax or raises a tax rate to win approval from two-thirds of the whole number of each House. The amendment would take effect in the fifth year after ratification.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 3 mixed.

Federal spending cap formula

Had it passed, the amendment would have capped total federal spending each year to the average of federal receipts in the prior three years. The cap would have been adjusted for changes in the U.S. citizen population and for inflation. The cap would not have counted payments on federal debt, and receipts from borrowing would not have counted. The rule would have started five years after ratification.

Overrides, timing, and implementation

Had it passed, the amendment would have let Congress, by a two-thirds roll-call vote in each House, authorize specific spending above the cap. It would have also allowed Congress, by a roll-call vote, to authorize excess spending during any year a declaration of war was in effect. The amendment would have required Congress to pass laws to enforce and implement the article. The amendment would have taken effect starting five years after ratification.

Two-thirds rule for new taxes

Had it passed, the amendment would have required two-thirds of the whole number of each House of Congress to approve any bill that levied a new tax or increased any tax rate. That higher vote threshold would have made new or higher federal taxes harder to pass. The change would have shaped future revenue and trade-offs between taxes and spending.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

AZ • R

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9]

    GA • R

    Sponsored 1/12/2026

  • Rep. Brecheen, Josh [R-OK-2]

    OK • R

    Sponsored 1/13/2026

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 211 • No: 207

house vote • 3/18/2026

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass

Yes: 211 • No: 207

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation