119-hr-1788119th CongressWALLET

Fair Grocery Pricing Act

Sponsored By: Representative Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]

Introduced

Summary

Bans algorithmic coordination that lets food makers tacitly fix prices or choke supply. The bill would bar food producers and the software services they hire from using data or algorithms to coordinate pricing, output, or other market terms.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Triple damages for grocery price-fixing

If enacted, anyone harmed by illegal grocery price coordination could sue in federal court, no matter the dollar amount. You could seek three times your actual damages plus reasonable court costs and attorney fees. You could also ask the court for simple interest on your actual damages from when the case is served to judgment. You could choose to void any pre-dispute arbitration or class or group action waiver tied to this claim.

Ban on algorithmic grocery price coordination

If enacted, food producers would be barred from hiring or paying coordinators to help set or match prices. Coordinators would be banned from helping producers agree not to compete on price, supply, or output. Contracting for these services would be treated as a per se antitrust violation. The bill defines coordinator and coordinating function to include software that collects price data, uses algorithms, and recommends prices or supply.

FTC, DOJ and states could enforce

If enacted, the FTC, the U.S. Attorney General, and state attorneys general could enforce these rules. The FTC could sue in federal court for civil penalties and other relief. Violations would also count as unfair methods of competition under the FTC Act. The bill would not change existing federal antitrust laws. It would not preempt state, Tribal, city, or local rules that add protections.

Easier to allege grocery collusion

If enacted, a complaint could move forward by alleging facts showing consciously parallel pricing by food producers. Plaintiffs would not have to plead facts that rule out independent action. This would make it easier to start antitrust cases over food pricing.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]

FL • D

Cosponsors

  • Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

    MA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]

    MI • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

    FL • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

    DC • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Rep. Fields, Cleo [D-LA-6]

    LA • D

    Sponsored 3/4/2025

  • Rep. Underwood, Lauren [D-IL-14]

    IL • D

    Sponsored 3/6/2025

  • Rep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 3/6/2025

  • Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]

    WI • D

    Sponsored 3/11/2025

  • Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7]

    IN • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Rep. Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [D-FL-25]

    FL • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6]

    MA • D

    Sponsored 3/24/2025

  • Rep. Olszewski, Johnny [D-MD-2]

    MD • D

    Sponsored 3/25/2025

  • Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]

    CT • D

    Sponsored 4/3/2025

  • Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]

    TN • D

    Sponsored 4/24/2025

  • Rep. Casar, Greg [D-TX-35]

    TX • D

    Sponsored 5/7/2025

  • Rep. Johnson, Julie [D-TX-32]

    TX • D

    Sponsored 7/17/2025

  • Rep. McIver, LaMonica [D-NJ-10]

    NJ • D

    Sponsored 10/28/2025

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation