GUARD Act
Sponsored By: Representative Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]
Introduced
Summary
Conditions federal child-protection funding on protecting parents who oppose gender-related medical or social interventions for minors. It would add a new Section 4 to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act that bars States from receiving CAPTA funds if they take adverse action against parents, guardians, or legal representatives who oppose such interventions.
Show full summary
- Parents and families: Parents, guardians, and legal representatives who oppose medical, surgical, pharmacological, psychological treatment, or social changes such as name, pronoun, or clothing use for a minor would be protected from state adverse action or discrimination based on the parent's estimation of the minor's biological sex.
- States and enforcement: States that take adverse action could lose CAPTA funding and may be required to return awards if a court finds a violation. The bill creates a private right of action allowing affected parents to sue the Department of Health and Human Services in federal or State court to enjoin awards and seek repayment to the Treasury.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Parents opposing gender transition protected
The bill would tie State child-protection grants to how States treat parents. A State would not get these grants if it punishes or discriminates against parents, guardians, or legal reps who oppose gender-transition medical care or social changes for a minor. This would apply when the parent believes the child’s gender identity does not match the child’s sex set at or before birth, even with a medical diagnosis. Parents who faced such action could sue HHS in federal or State court to stop future awards and to make the State return money given in violation. If passed, States could lose or have to repay funding, which could affect services in that State.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]
WY • R
Cosponsors
Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]
IL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]
WI • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Rep. Biggs, Sheri [R-SC-3]
SC • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Rep. Brecheen, Josh [R-OK-2]
OK • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Rep. Gill, Brandon [R-TX-26]
TX • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]
AL • R
Sponsored 3/5/2025
Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]
GA • R
Sponsored 3/10/2025
Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9]
AZ • R
Sponsored 3/31/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov