SEER Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Representative Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1]
Introduced
Summary
Stronger ethics and transparency for Special Government Employees (SGEs). This bill would tighten conflict-of-interest limits for SGEs, require official designation on personnel forms, and push waivers into the public view quickly.
Show full summary
- Special Government Employees: It would expand when SGEs face conflict rules, cover SGEs who are not on advisory committees and those who serve as chair or vice chair, and apply prohibitions to specific parts of a matter where the SGE’s organization has a financial interest.
- Agencies and the Office of Government Ethics: Waivers under the law would need concurrence from a designated OGE official before issuance.
- Public and oversight: Any waiver or exemption must be posted in a searchable online database within 14 days, and waivers for non-advisory SGEs or chairs and vice chairs must be made promptly accessible.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 2 costs, 0 mixed.
Public SGE database and waiver checks
Agency conflict‑of‑interest waivers for SGEs would need concurrence from an Office of Government Ethics official. For SGEs not on advisory committees, or who chair or vice chair, any waiver would be posted online in a searchable database within 14 days. The government would run a free public database listing covered SGEs, showing days served and why each was designated an SGE. Online financial disclosure access would expand to executive‑branch SGEs who are not on advisory committees or who chair or vice chair, and to those above GS‑9 without close supervision. Agency ethics officers would review claimed exemptions from public filing, and SGE status would appear on the employee’s personnel form.
Stricter conflict rules for SGEs
This bill would tighten conflict rules for special Government employees (SGEs) not on advisory panels, or who chair or vice chair one. They would be barred from official contacts about a large company they own or help run with any agency that regulates, contracts with, or is enforcing against it. Large company would mean a for‑profit with over $1 billion average market cap or revenue over three years, a federal contractor paid over $100 million a year, or a firm with monopoly‑like power set by OGE rules. If an SGE served more than 60 days in the last 365 days, all federal ethics rules would apply; after more than 130 days, the pay‑supplement ban and related rules would also apply, even if unpaid. For these SGEs, the conflict ban would also reach discrete parts of a matter tied to their organization, and OGE would issue implementing rules.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Stansbury, Melanie A. [D-NM-1]
NM • D
Cosponsors
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]
MA • D
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Rep. McCollum, Betty [D-MN-4]
MN • D
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]
MI • D
Sponsored 4/10/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov