All Roll Calls
Yes: 226 • No: 195
Sponsored By: Representative Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
Passed House
Bold: sustained U.S. military, economic, and diplomatic support for Ukraine. This bill would extend and expand tools to arm and finance Ukraine, create reconstruction financing and insurance, and impose sweeping trigger-based sanctions on Russia and its backers.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
9 provisions identified: 6 benefits, 3 costs, 0 mixed.
If enacted, $250 million would be authorized in FY2026 for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and the President would report in 90 days on possible new bureaus and staffing. The bill would also steer existing funds to help Ukraine fight disinformation, support independent media and media literacy, and detect or remove troll‑farm content. The State Department would deliver an unclassified plan within 60 days, with an optional classified annex.
If enacted, up to $8 billion in direct loans would be available through fiscal year 2026 for Ukraine and NATO allies, and unused Foreign Military Financing could cover loan costs. The bill would add $300 million for FY2026 and $300 million for FY2027 to the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative and extend it to December 31, 2027. Lend‑lease authority would extend through FY2028, with a report to Congress within 90 days after each use. For each Baltic country, it would authorize $30 million per year for military financing and $4 million per year for related security programs for FY2026–FY2028, with a briefing to Congress within 120 days.
If enacted, interest or dividends tied to assets blocked under emergency powers for Russia or Belarus would be taxed at 100%. Anyone who controls or pays that income would have to withhold the full amount and send it to the IRS. This would apply to interest and dividends received after enactment and would ignore tax treaties.
If enacted, once the President makes the required finding, the government would impose wide sanctions within about 15 days on major Russian banks, energy firms, and foreign facilitators. Tariffs on Russian imports would be raised to at least 500% within 15 days, and a report on tariff impacts would be due in 60 days. U.S. persons would be barred from new Russian government debt within 30 days, and imports of fuel products made at refineries that use Russian crude would be banned. Export controls would expand to treat some foreign‑made items using U.S. tech and headed to Russia as U.S.‑controlled, with exceptions for food, medicine, and certain communications. The President would block property, revoke some visas, require 100% withholding on disqualified interest or dividends, and U.S. officials at global lenders would oppose financing that benefits sanctioned persons.
If enacted, Commerce would deliver a 60‑day plan to stop illegal exports to Iran of key microelectronics and related tech used in drones. The State Department would make a 90‑day plan with allies to prevent such exports. The Defense Department would propose options in 30 days and brief Congress within 45 days. Reports would be unclassified, with optional classified annexes.
If enacted, the Secretary of State would submit a U.S.–European nuclear energy strategy within 120 days. The bill would authorize $30 million each year for FY2025 through FY2029 to carry out that strategy.
If enacted, the Treasury would create a Ukraine Reconstruction Trust Fund fed by net revenues from a listed tax, but money would be spent only by future appropriations for rebuilding, aid, private‑sector growth, and governance. The State Department would name a Special Coordinator to align agencies and attract private capital. A new Insurance for Ukraine Initiative would support war‑risk insurance and grain shipments, with annual progress reports for three years. For five years, vessels carrying cargo to or from Ukraine would be eligible for federal war‑risk insurance or reinsurance if owned by NATO members, Ukraine, or countries the Secretary approves.
If enacted, the President would have to report to Congress before lifting or waiving a Russia sanction or making a major licensing change. A 30‑day review would apply (60 days if filed July 10–September 7), and the President generally could not act unless Congress approves. If Congress passes a disapproval, action would be delayed 12 days; after a veto, action would be delayed 10 days. The bill would also let the President use emergency economic powers to enforce rules with IEEPA penalties, and it would define key terms like U.S. person, foreign person, and "knowingly."
If enacted, the Director of National Intelligence would send a classified report in 120 days and then every 90 days on U.S. intelligence help to Ukraine and the effects of stopping it. The State Department would send an unclassified report in 90 days and then every 90 days listing allied military contributions by country and type, Ukraine’s needs, and U.S. actions to meet them.
Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
NY • D
Rep. Hoyer, Steny H. [D-MD-5]
MD • D
Sponsored 4/14/2025
Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]
VA • D
Sponsored 4/14/2025
Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37]
TX • D
Sponsored 4/14/2025
Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9]
MA • D
Sponsored 4/14/2025
Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]
PA • D
Sponsored 4/21/2025
Rep. Landsman, Greg [D-OH-1]
OH • D
Sponsored 4/21/2025
Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]
LA • D
Sponsored 4/21/2025
Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]
CA • D
Sponsored 4/29/2025
Rep. Johnson, Julie [D-TX-32]
TX • D
Sponsored 4/29/2025
Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]
NY • D
Sponsored 6/3/2025
Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]
NV • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]
FL • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Fields, Cleo [D-LA-6]
LA • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Williams, Nikema [D-GA-5]
GA • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]
NY • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Pallone, Frank [D-NJ-6]
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-25]
CA • D
Sponsored 6/4/2025
Rep. Morelle, Joseph D. [D-NY-25]
NY • D
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Rep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]
NY • D
Sponsored 6/5/2025
Rep. Amo, Gabe [D-RI-1]
RI • D
Sponsored 6/11/2025
Rep. Olszewski, Johnny [D-MD-2]
MD • D
Sponsored 6/23/2025
Rep. McClain Delaney, April [D-MD-6]
MD • D
Sponsored 7/2/2025
Rep. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ-8]
NJ • D
Sponsored 7/17/2025
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12]
NY • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Bell, Wesley [D-MO-1]
MO • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Elfreth, Sarah [D-MD-3]
MD • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2]
NC • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]
MA • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Mannion, John W. [D-NY-22]
NY • D
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2]
RI • D
Sponsored 9/11/2025
Rep. Meng, Grace [D-NY-6]
NY • D
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1]
NH • D
Sponsored 9/19/2025
Rep. Walkinshaw, James R. [D-VA-11]
VA • D
Sponsored 9/30/2025
Rep. Sherman, Brad [D-CA-32]
CA • D
Sponsored 10/21/2025
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
TN • D
Sponsored 11/10/2025
Rep. McBride, Sarah [D-DE-At Large]
DE • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]
MD • D
Sponsored 11/19/2025
Rep. Latimer, George [D-NY-16]
NY • D
Sponsored 4/30/2026
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]
OH • D
Sponsored 5/13/2026
Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]
CA • D
Sponsored 5/13/2026
Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]
NH • D
Sponsored 6/2/2026
Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]
NE • R
Sponsored 6/2/2026
All Roll Calls
Yes: 226 • No: 195
house vote • 6/4/2026
On Passage
Yes: 226 • No: 195
119-hr-2550, Protect America's Workforce Act
Preserves federal employees' collective bargaining agreements. This Act nullifies the Executive Order titled "Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs." - Federal employees and unions: Collective bargaining agreements that were in effect on March 26, 2025 remain valid and continue to apply through each contract's stated term. - Federal agencies and federal funds: Agencies may not obligate or spend federal funds to carry out that Executive Order, and the Executive Order has no force or effect.
119-hres-70, Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should take all appropriate measures to ensure that the United States Postal Service remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government and is not subject to privatization.
Keep the U.S. Postal Service public and independent. This resolution would urge Congress to prevent privatization by framing USPS as a constitutionally authorized, self‑sustaining federal establishment that does not rely on taxpayer funding. It highlights USPS's scale and role: more than 630,000 employees including about 73,000 veterans, service to over 168 million addresses daily, and a central place in a $1.9 trillion mailing industry that employs roughly 7.9 million Americans. The text warns privatization would raise prices, cut services—especially in rural areas—and threaten e‑commerce and critical infrastructure.
119-hr-15, Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
119-hr-1589, American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
This bill would create a new conditional lawful permanent resident pathway for people who arrived in the United States as children. It also would add a separate adjustment track for certain Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure beneficiaries and build procedural protections and fee rules for applicants. - Families and young people: Eligible applicants must have been continuously present since Jan 1, 2021 and arrived as children. Successful applicants would get a 10-year conditional lawful permanent resident status and could remove the conditional basis later by meeting education, military, or workforce requirements. - Students, workers, and service members: Removal of the conditional basis can follow a college credential or two years of U.S. military service, or three years of earned income with at least 75 percent of the time on valid work authorization. Hardship exceptions are available for compelling circumstances. - TPS/DED holders, legal process, and supports: A separate TPS/DED track would cover certain nationals with three years of continuous presence and an application window of three years after enactment; fees are capped at $495 for the child-entry path and $1,140 for the TPS/DED track. The bill would require biometric and background checks, authorize employment authorization and advance parole during processing, create a $25 surcharge to fund appointed counsel, and fund grants and confidentiality protections for applicants.
119-hr-2763, American Family Act
This bill creates monthly child tax credit payments that replace the annual Child Tax Credit mechanism and add a separate credit for other dependents. It sets fixed monthly amounts, a monthly advance payment system, rules for presumptive eligibility, and enforcement for improper claims. - Families and parents: Parents get monthly payments of $300 per child age 6 and older, higher monthly rates for younger children, and a $2,400 payment for a child in their birth month. - Other dependents and income: A new $500 nonrefundable credit for other dependents is added and phases out for higher earners, with thresholds that vary up to about $400,000 depending on filing status. - Administration and safeguards: The IRS will deliver monthly advance payments, use presumptive eligibility and a submission portal, require child and taxpayer TINs, permit limited data sharing with other government entities, and can disallow claims for fraud with penalties including a 120-month bar for fraud and a 24-month bar for reckless or intentional disregard.
119-hr-17, Paycheck Fairness Act
Strengthening pay equity by expanding who is protected and limiting employers from using past pay, the Paycheck Fairness Act would tighten how pay differences are justified and increase enforcement and data collection. - Workers and prospective employees would gain a ban on employer reliance on wage history and new nonretaliation protections for wage discussions. The bill lets a candidate voluntarily share prior pay only after a job offer and only to justify a higher wage. - Employers would face new civil penalties for wage-history violations starting at $5,000 for a first offense and rising by $1,000 per subsequent offense to a $10,000 cap. Affected workers could recover damages up to $10,000 plus attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief where appropriate. - Federal enforcement and oversight would increase. The EEOC and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs would enforce the rules. The bill would create a National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force and require expanded pay-data collection by EEOC, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and OFCCP from federal contractors. Provisions would take effect six months after enactment.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo