119-hr-3453119th CongressWALLET

Empower Charter School Educators to Lead Act

Sponsored By: Representative Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

In Committee

Summary

Expand federal support for high-quality charter school development. This bill would broaden the federal grant program that helps start and grow high-quality charter schools by adding technical assistance, authorizer oversight, facility and short-term loan options, and dedicated pre-charter planning grants.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

3 provisions identified: 2 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Pre‑charter planning grants for developers

If enacted, the bill would create pre‑charter planning subgrants of up to $100,000 per recipient. Grants would be available to charter school developers or nonprofit or public groups that support them. To qualify, the developer lead would need at least 54 months of school‑based experience and demonstrated leadership as determined by the State. Applicants would also need to intend to apply to operate a charter school and have an initial plan describing local educational needs and how the proposed school will meet them.

State help for charter applicants and authorizers

If enacted, the bill would let State education entities provide technical assistance to eligible charter applicants and to authorized public chartering agencies. States would be required to work with authorizers to improve authorizing quality, including fiscal oversight and audits. States could also choose to fund a revolving loan or similar fund to cover applicant expenses before subgrant awards and to help applicants locate and access facilities.

New split of charter grant funds

If enacted, the bill would change how certain charter grant funds are divided. The largest share would fall from 90% to 82%. Another share would become up to 10% (instead of not less than 7%), and up to 5% would be reserved for pre‑charter planning subgrants. These changes would shift funding among State agencies, authorizers, and developers while keeping the overall grant program in place.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

LA • R

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

    HI • D

    Sponsored 5/15/2025

  • Rep. Kiley, Kevin [I-CA-3]

    CA • I

    Sponsored 5/15/2025

  • Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]

    HI • D

    Sponsored 5/15/2025

  • Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

    AZ • R

    Sponsored 5/15/2025

  • Rep. Timmons, William R. [R-SC-4]

    SC • R

    Sponsored 5/20/2025

  • Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]

    MI • D

    Sponsored 6/2/2025

  • Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]

    MI • R

    Sponsored 6/2/2025

  • Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]

    LA • D

    Sponsored 6/10/2025

  • Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-41]

    CA • R

    Sponsored 6/17/2025

  • Rep. Messmer, Mark B. [R-IN-8]

    IN • R

    Sponsored 6/25/2025

  • Rep. Cleaver, Emanuel [D-MO-5]

    MO • D

    Sponsored 7/14/2025

  • Rep. Meuser, Daniel [R-PA-9]

    PA • R

    Sponsored 9/2/2025

  • Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9]

    CA • D

    Sponsored 9/2/2025

  • Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1]

    GA • R

    Sponsored 9/2/2025

  • Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]

    OK • R

    Sponsored 9/3/2025

  • Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15]

    FL • R

    Sponsored 9/8/2025

  • Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]

    WA • R

    Sponsored 9/8/2025

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation