All Roll Calls
Yes: 429 • No: 420
Sponsored By: Representative Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
Passed House
This law strengthens the nation's focus on _power grid reliability_ by letting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order measures to keep interstate electric service adequate and by requiring advance public notice of plant retirements. It lets the Commission require continued operation of generating units when needed and sets a 5-year public notice rule for planned retirements.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
2 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 2 mixed.
If enacted, federal regulators could step in when a state or grid operator files a complaint and service is weak now or within five years. A hearing would be offered within 90 days. They could order certain power units to keep running and require long‑term planning and construction of interstate transmission. The Commission would set and allocate payments to cover added costs, which could show up in customer rates. Orders would last up to five years and could be extended only through a short request window. The Commission could not force plant expansions or sales that would harm local service, and doing what is needed to follow an order would not count as breaking environmental laws.
The bill would require owners planning to retire a power unit to give at least five years’ notice to the Commission and affected state or transmission bodies. Notices would be posted publicly. No notice would be needed if a disaster or emergency makes the unit inoperable. Covered units would be those with 5 megawatts or more that are connected to the bulk‑power grid, and “retire” would mean idling, disconnecting, or otherwise making the unit’s power unavailable for sale for an indefinite time.
Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
VA • R
Rep. Carter, Earl L. "Buddy" [R-GA-1]
GA • R
Sponsored 6/9/2025
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
CA • R
Sponsored 6/11/2025
Rep. Onder, Robert F. [R-MO-3]
MO • R
Sponsored 7/21/2025
Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]
WV • R
Sponsored 9/17/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 429 • No: 420
house vote • 12/16/2025
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 207 • No: 218
house vote • 12/16/2025
On Passage
Yes: 222 • No: 202
119-hr-879, Medicare Patient Access and Practice Stabilization Act of 2025
Temporarily boosts Medicare payments to physicians and other practitioners by 6.62% for services furnished on or after April 1, 2025 and before January 1, 2026. It also updates statute language so 2025 is included in the program’s payment‑update rules. - Physicians and other practitioners: Receives a temporary 6.62% increase to Medicare payments for covered services during the specified period. - Statutory alignment: Replaces listed years with the range "2021 through 2025" so the 2025 period is applied consistently in the law.
119-hr-703, Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
119-hr-425, Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
This bill would repeal the Corporate Transparency Act and remove its broad domestic beneficial-ownership reporting rules. It refocuses the law to cover only foreign beneficial ownership and requires the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to delete certain non-foreign and non-reporting records within 90 days. - Individuals who are not foreign beneficial owners: BOI that FinCEN collected about these individuals would be deleted within 90 days. - Corporations, limited liability companies, and similar entities that are not reporting companies: BOI for those entities would be deleted within 90 days. - The text of 31 U.S.C. 5336 would be rewritten to insert the word "foreign" before every occurrence of "beneficial" and to change how foreign ownership and reporting-company definitions are described.
119-hr-5267, American Franchise Act
This bill would narrow when franchisors are treated as joint employers by creating a 'substantial direct and immediate control' test that ties joint-employer status to specific employment terms. - Franchisors would be a joint employer only if they regularly exercise substantial direct and immediate control over one or more of eight essential employment terms. - Franchisees would keep day-to-day control over operations, training, branding, and routine staffing actions, protecting their status as independent businesses in most cases. - Workers could only hold franchisors jointly liable when franchisors actually control core terms like wages, hiring, or discipline. The bill would not apply to proceedings started before enactment.
119-hr-3699, Energy Choice Act
Preempt state and local limits on energy sources. This bill would bar a State or local government, and any state or local instrumentality or regulatory agency, from adopting, implementing, or enforcing laws, building codes, standards, or policies that prohibit or limit connecting, reconnecting, modifying, installing, transporting, distributing, expanding, or accessing an energy service based on the type or source of energy when that energy is sold in interstate commerce and delivered to an end-user.
119-hr-1232, National Right-to-Work Act
This bill would eliminate statutory rules that allow employers or agreements to require union membership or dues as a condition of employment, changing key language in the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act. It removes clauses that referenced or authorized union-security agreements and reworks several NLRA provisions that limit or condition organizing and bargaining rules. - Workers: Would make union membership and paying union dues voluntary for employees covered by the NLRA and the Railway Labor Act. It strikes statutory text that previously tied employment conditions to union support. - Labor organizations: Would narrow the legal basis for union-security arrangements by deleting specific provisos and references in multiple NLRA sections. That reduces a statutory lever unions have relied on to require membership or fees. - Employers and rail industry bargaining: Would alter the structure of bargaining and representation rules by removing a paragraph from the Railway Labor Act and redesignating parts of the NLRA, changing the statutory framework that governs employer-employee union relations.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo