Judicial Review Timeline Clarity Act
Sponsored By: Representative Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7]
In Committee
Summary
Creates a time-limited judicial-review framework for Section 404 permits that govern discharges of dredged or fill material. It conditions who can sue on filing sufficiently detailed comments and narrows courts' power to vacate or enjoin permits absent an imminent and substantial danger.
Show full summary
- Permit holders and project applicants would face a 60-day deadline for lawsuits challenging individual or general permits, shortening the window for litigation.
- Public commenters and advocacy groups could only bring suit if they submitted sufficiently detailed comments during the administrative public comment period that put the agency on notice of the issue.
- Courts that find noncompliance must remand the matter to the Secretary or the State and set a schedule for corrective action, generally no more than 180 days, and may not vacate or enjoin permits unless activities pose an imminent and substantial danger to health or the environment.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
2 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.
Stricter deadlines to sue over water permits
This bill would set a 60-day deadline to file court challenges to dredge-and-fill permits or agency verifications. You would also need to have filed a detailed public comment during the permit process on the same issue. If enacted, this would narrow who can sue and when.
Faster remands, fewer water permit injunctions
If a court finds the agency did not follow the law, it would have to send the case back. The court would set and enforce a deadline, no more than 180 days, for the agency to act, unless another law requires more time. Courts could not cancel or block a permit, or stop a verified discharge, unless the activity would cause an imminent and substantial danger and no other fair remedy exists. If passed, this could speed decisions but make emergency blocks harder.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Burlison, Eric [R-MO-7]
MO • R
Cosponsors
There are no cosponsors for this bill.
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov