All Roll Calls
Yes: 371 • No: 33
Sponsored By: Representative Case, Ed [D-HI-1]
Passed House
Invasive species strike teams will be created and funded to detect, respond to, and manage invasive species on and near National Wildlife Refuge System lands. The Program requires at least one team in each U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service region and sets standards for training, data sharing, and coordinated responses.
*Authorizes $10.0 million per year from 2027 through 2033 to carry out the Program, increasing federal spending by that amount.*
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
4 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
If enacted, Congress would be authorized to provide $10 million each year from 2027 through 2033 to run the program. This authorization would not guarantee money. Congress would still need to approve funds in future budgets.
If enacted, the Interior Department would be able to give money or technical help to governments, Tribes, schools, and private landowners who ask for it. Help could come as direct spending, contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements. The Department could also sign agreements to send a strike team when asked. Any help would depend on future funding approved by Congress.
If enacted, the program would use common species names and national databases to report invasive species, such as EDDMapS, USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species, iMapInvasives, and State systems. The Secretary would also report to Congress and post public updates two years and five years after enactment. Each report would describe each team’s work and progress on priority invasive species.
If enacted, the Interior Department would set up at least one invasive species strike team in every Fish and Wildlife Service region. Teams would find and respond fast to harmful plants, animals, and other species on or near refuges. They would use integrated pest management and run trainings and table‑top drills. Work near non‑federal lands would be coordinated with States or Tribes, and teams would act on private land only if the owner asks. The bill would define key terms and make clear that “State” includes D.C. and all U.S. territories.
Case, Ed [D-HI-1]
HI • D
Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]
GU • R
Sponsored 6/27/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 371 • No: 33
house vote • 9/14/2026
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Yes: 371 • No: 33
119-hr-3718, Sustaining America’s Fisheries for the Future Act of 2025
Climate-ready fisheries management would be the central aim, shifting federal fishery rules to explicitly factor climate change, habitat loss, and community resilience into science, planning, and management. It also pairs stronger data, monitoring, and governance rules with new grants and loan tools for coastal communities. - Families, fishers, and coastal communities: Would require Councils and NOAA to do regular vulnerability assessments, produce resilience plans, and fold climate science and social-economic needs into stock assessments and management decisions. This aims to protect livelihoods and coastal economies as stocks shift. - Working waterfronts, local governments, and borrowers: Would create competitive grants and perpetual revolving loan funds to preserve and adapt waterfront access, allow loans up to 40 years for disadvantaged communities, and prioritize climate-adaptation projects. It authorizes $50.0 million per year for FY2026–2030 for these programs. - Tribes, Councils, and data users: Would expand tribal seats and community participation in limited-access programs, require more transparency and conflict disclosures, and modernize data and electronic monitoring. It establishes a Climate-Ready Fisheries Innovation Program with $5.0 million per year for FY2026–2030 to support tools and stakeholder engagement. Would authorize roughly $275.0 million in program funding across FY2026–2030, increasing potential federal spending.
119-hr-7977, Energy Bills Relief Act
Restores low-cost clean-energy tax credits while remaking permitting, grid resilience, and household energy aid to speed renewables and reduce household energy burdens. It pairs tax and permitting changes with new grant and manufacturing money to push clean power and support communities.
119-hr-3151, SHIPS for America Act of 2025
Rebuild U.S. commercial shipbuilding and a U.S.-flag strategic fleet by pairing new tax credits, grants, and operating payments with stronger cargo-preference rules and workforce and innovation programs to restore domestic capacity and sealift readiness. It centralizes maritime strategy in a White House advisor and a Maritime Security Board and funds a broad set of industrial, port, and training programs to favor U.S.-built, U.S.-crewed vessels.
119-hr-10061, Wildfire Response and Readiness Act
dramatically expand prescribed fire and landscape‑scale restoration. This bill would create a National Prescribed Fire Program plus a 10‑year National Wildfire Plan to grow prescribed‑fire acreage and coordinate landscape restoration across Federal and partner lands while building workforce, monitoring, and grant tools. - Families and communities: creates an Individual Household Disaster Mitigation program offering up to $10,000 per household for qualifying pre‑disaster measures, with income caps of $250,000 (single) and $500,000 (joint). - Workers and agencies: funds workforce pipelines including Civilian Conservation Centers, training grants, and hiring goals that target 300 program graduates per Secretary each year, plus CPI‑based annual pay increases and new pay and hazard‑duty authorities for wildland firefighters. - Landscapes, Tribes, and rural economies: authorizes landscape restoration and post‑fire rehabilitation accounts, including a Long‑Term Burned Area Rehabilitation account capped at $100.0 million per year and a Collaborative Prescribed Fire Program capped at $20.0 million per year. Net fiscal: would authorize new, multi‑year federal spending across many programs and accounts and therefore increase federal outlays over FY2027–FY2036.
119-hr-562, BLUE Pacific Act
Boosts long-term U.S. engagement in the Pacific by creating a coordinated strategy, staffing, and targeted programs to deepen diplomatic, economic, security, and people-to-people ties with Pacific Island nations. The bill sets measurable strategy deadlines and new program authorities across health, trade, media, education, disaster resilience, oceans, and technology.
119-hr-7481, Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026
DHS funding with strict oversight. This bill would set FY2026 funding levels across the Department of Homeland Security and attach detailed reporting, transfer limits, and program rules to many accounts.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo