All Roll Calls
Yes: 418 • No: 416
Sponsored By: Representative Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]
Passed House
Prevents green or high‑performance building certifications from being denied solely because a building directly or indirectly uses fossil fuels. It changes federal building efficiency rules, removes certain DOE subparts, and orders the Department of Energy to write new regulations within 180 days to reflect the change.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
2 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
If enacted, the bill would remove two Energy Department rule sections for federal building standards. It would also strike two related clauses in federal law. Until new rules issue, agencies would apply standards as if those clauses never took effect. The Energy Department would have 180 days after enactment to issue new regulations. This would change compliance for federal building projects and contractors during the transition.
If enacted, the green building rating system the government uses would get a new guardrail. It would not deny a green or high‑performance label just because a building uses fossil fuels. This would cover direct and indirect fossil fuel use. Owners seeking that label would still need to meet all other rules.
Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]
NY • R
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
TN • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12]
OH • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Rulli, Michael A. [R-OH-6]
OH • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large]
ND • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Harrigan, Pat [R-NC-10]
NC • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Goldman, Craig A. [R-TX-12]
TX • R
Sponsored 7/23/2025
Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9]
NC • R
Sponsored 8/5/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 418 • No: 416
house vote • 4/22/2026
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 203 • No: 214
house vote • 4/22/2026
On Passage
Yes: 215 • No: 202
119-hr-987, Fair Access to Banking Act
Prevents banks and payment networks from cutting off customers for political or reputational reasons. It sets a national standard that forces objective, risk-based decisions and creates a private right of action for people and businesses harmed by unfair denials. - Families and households keep access to bank accounts and payment services without being excluded for politics or reputation, and any denial must include a written, quantifiable justification. - Lawful businesses and nonprofits, including politically unpopular ones, gain protection from category-based refusals and can sue for treble damages and attorney’s fees if a covered institution violates the rules. - Banks, credit unions, and payment networks must adopt impartial, data-driven risk standards, may face civil penalties, and large institutions that refuse service could lose access to discount window lending or automated clearing house services.
119-hr-7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025
Bans taxpayer funding for abortions and for health plans that include abortion coverage. The bill lets people buy separate abortion-only coverage paid entirely with non-federal funds, while preventing ACA premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions from applying to plans that include abortion. - Families and ACA enrollees: If an Exchange plan covers abortion you cannot use premium tax credits or cost-sharing reductions for that plan. You may buy a separate abortion-only plan but it is not eligible for those federal subsidies. - Small employers: Small-employer health insurance tax credits exclude plans that include abortion coverage. Employers can offer separate abortion plans only if those plans are funded without federal money. - Insurers and multi-State plans: No multi-State qualified health plan sold in an Exchange may provide abortion benefits paid with federal funds. Insurers must clearly disclose abortion coverage and any surcharge tied to abortion services in enrollment materials. - States and providers: States and non-federal providers may offer abortion coverage funded entirely with non-federal funds. The bill preserves exceptions for rape, incest, and life-threatening pregnancies and explicitly applies rules to the District of Columbia.
119-hr-404, Hearing Protection Act
This bill would reclassify firearm silencers under federal law by removing them from the National Firearms Act's definition of “firearm” and creating a parallel federal licensing and tax framework. It would also preempt state and local silencer taxes and require destruction of prior federal silencer records. - Owners and buyers: People acquiring or possessing silencers would be subject to a federal licensing and registration regime under Chapter 44 of Title 18, even as silencers are taken out of the NFA firearm definition. - State and local governments: Would be barred from imposing taxes, special registration, marking, or recordkeeping on silencers beyond ordinary sales or use taxes. - Records and industry rules: Would require destruction of existing silencer entries in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record within 365 days, mandate serial-number marking on silencers, and add a 10 percent federal excise tax on silencers sold by manufacturers or importers.
119-hr-703, Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
119-hr-425, Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
This bill would repeal the Corporate Transparency Act and remove its broad domestic beneficial-ownership reporting rules. It refocuses the law to cover only foreign beneficial ownership and requires the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to delete certain non-foreign and non-reporting records within 90 days. - Individuals who are not foreign beneficial owners: BOI that FinCEN collected about these individuals would be deleted within 90 days. - Corporations, limited liability companies, and similar entities that are not reporting companies: BOI for those entities would be deleted within 90 days. - The text of 31 U.S.C. 5336 would be rewritten to insert the word "foreign" before every occurrence of "beneficial" and to change how foreign ownership and reporting-company definitions are described.
119-hr-45, FIND Act
The FIND Act would stop the federal government from using procurement to penalize the firearm and ammunition industry by barring contracts with entities that discriminate against those businesses. Agencies would require contractors to certify they have no policy, practice, guidance, or directive that discriminates against firearm entities or firearm trade associations and that they will not adopt one during the contract term. - Firearm and ammunition businesses: Covers licensed importers, manufacturers, dealers, ammunition sellers, makers of secure gun storage or safety devices, and makers or sellers of parts and accessories. This gives those firms and trade associations explicit protection in federal procurement. - Federal contractors and prime contractors: Must include a certification clause in each contract and face contract termination for default plus suspension or debarment if they violate it. - Subcontracting limits: Primes may not award a first-tier subcontract worth more than 10% of the prime contract to an entity that will not certify, and they may not dodge the 10% rule by pushing work to lower-tier subcontractors. - Agencies and exceptions: Heads of executive agencies must insert these clauses into procurements. Sole-source contracts are exempt.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo