CLEAR ID Act
Sponsored By: Representative Crockett, Jasmine [D-TX-30]
In Committee
Summary
identity-disclosure requirements are tied to DHS funding for civil immigration enforcement. The bill blocks federal DHS funds for actions unless officers visibly and verbally identify themselves, show agency badges, and use marked vehicles, with narrow medical and approved-undercover exceptions.
Show full summary
- Families and communities: People in areas of civil immigration enforcement would more often see officers show badges, wear agency uniforms, and use vehicles that clearly identify the agency.
- Officers and agencies: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and any DHS-authorized agency must avoid masks that hide identity and must label vehicles or risk funding limits.
- Undercover operations: Masks may be allowed if medically necessary or if an undercover operation is approved using five specific risk-and-suitability factors, including risk of harm, civil liability, privacy invasion, potential unlawful conduct, and suitability of participation.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Immigration officers must show ID
If enacted, the bill would bar DHS from using federal funds for civil immigration enforcement unless officers clearly identify themselves. Officers would not be allowed to wear masks or face coverings that hide their identity. Vehicles used in operations would need visible agency names. Officers would need to show agency identification, visibly present a badge, and wear a uniform. Medically necessary face coverings would be allowed. Undercover operations could use coverings only if approved after officials consider five risks: personal injury or property harm; civil liability to the government; privacy or privilege harms; risk of unlawful conduct by participants; and whether government participation is suitable.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Crockett, Jasmine [D-TX-30]
TX • D
Cosponsors
Rep. Dexter, Maxine [D-OR-3]
OR • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Rep. Johnson, Julie [D-TX-32]
TX • D
Sponsored 8/1/2025
Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]
GA • D
Sponsored 9/15/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 10/3/2025
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2]
CA • D
Sponsored 10/17/2025
Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]
PA • D
Sponsored 10/31/2025
Rep. McClain Delaney, April [D-MD-6]
MD • D
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1]
CO • D
Sponsored 1/30/2026
Rep. Cisneros, Gilbert Ray [D-CA-31]
CA • D
Sponsored 2/4/2026
Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]
MI • D
Sponsored 5/21/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov