119-hr-504119th CongressWALLET

Miccosukee Reserved Area Amendments Act

Sponsored By: Representative Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28]

Vetoed

Summary

Would add Osceola Camp to the Miccosukee Reserved Area. The bill would designate the portion of Everglades National Park depicted on the July 2023 map (map no. 160/188443) as part of the reserved area, require copies of that map be available for public inspection and filed with the National Park Service, Miami‑Dade County, and the Miccosukee Tribe, and direct the Secretary, in consultation with the Tribe, to take actions within two years to protect camp structures from flooding.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Flood protections for Osceola Camp

This bill sought to add Osceola Camp to the Miccosukee Reserved Area. It would have required the map titled "Everglades National Park, Proposed Expansion-Miccosukee Reserved Area, Osceola Camp" (map no. 160/188443, July 2023) be kept in National Park Service offices. Copies would also have been filed with Miami-Dade County and the Miccosukee Tribe. It would have required the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Miccosukee Tribe, to take actions to protect structures in Osceola Camp from flooding within two years of enactment.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28]

FL • R

Cosponsors

  • Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26]

    FL • R

    Sponsored 1/16/2025

  • Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27]

    FL • R

    Sponsored 1/16/2025

  • Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]

    FL • D

    Sponsored 2/5/2025

Roll Call Votes

All Roll Calls

Yes: 236 • No: 188

house vote • 1/8/2026

Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding

Yes: 236 • No: 188

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation