119-hr-8454119th Congress

To provide for the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain Federal land in the State of California, and for other purposes.

Sponsored By: Representative McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5]

Passed House

Summary

This bill would complete a targeted land swap between Yosemite National Park and Stanislaus National Forest to align which agency manages specific parcels in Tuolumne County. It would move parcels so each is managed under the rules for either the National Park System or the National Forest System and allow limited boundary corrections by agreement.

Show full summary
  • Visitors and recreation: About 160 acres would transfer into Yosemite and about 170 acres would transfer into Stanislaus, so those parcels would be governed by park or forest rules respectively.
  • Federal land managers: The Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture could make minor corrections to surveys and boundaries by mutual agreement, with any correction becoming effective on the date a Federal Register notice is published.
  • Existing rights and permits: Existing withdrawals, rights-of-way, easements, leases, licenses, and permits remain valid, and the agency receiving the land would administer those interests under applicable law beginning on enactment.

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Land swap between Yosemite and Stanislaus

If enacted, the bill would move management of two small land parcels in Tuolumne County, California. About 160 acres would shift from the national forest to Yosemite National Park. About 170 acres would shift from the park to Stanislaus National Forest. Existing permits, easements, leases, rights-of-way, and other valid rights would stay in place. The receiving agency would run those permits starting on the date of enactment. Small boundary fixes would take effect when a notice is posted in the Federal Register.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

McClintock, Tom [R-CA-5]

CA • R

Cosponsors

There are no cosponsors for this bill.

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation