Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members, officers, and employees of the House of Representatives from participating in prediction markets in certain cases, and for other purposes.
Sponsored By: Representative Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]
Introduced
Summary
Ban on prediction-market trading by House officials. This bill would prohibit House officials from entering into trades or agreements that depend on the occurrence of specific events tied to an "excluded commodity" under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Show full summary
- Members, Delegates, the Resident Commissioner, and House officers and employees would be barred from entering into any agreement, contract, swap, or transaction that provides for purchase, sale, payment, or delivery of an excluded commodity that depends on a specific event or contingency.
- The prohibition would not apply to insurance where the insured holds a lawful insurable interest and would not apply to lawful sports wagers.
- The bill would express the sense that the executive branch and the judicial branch should adopt similar restrictions on participation in prediction markets.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Ban on prediction markets for House staff
This resolution would prohibit any Member, Delegate, the Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House from entering into or offering any agreement, contract, swap, or transaction that pays out based on whether a specific event happens. The ban would cover deals tied to the purchase, sale, payment, or delivery of an "excluded commodity" as defined in federal law. It would not apply to insurance when the insured has a lawful insurable interest, and it would not apply to lawful sports wagers. The resolution would also express the sense that the executive and judicial branches should adopt similar restrictions.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]
NV • D
Cosponsors
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 5/4/2026
Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-25]
CA • D
Sponsored 5/4/2026
Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
PA • D
Sponsored 5/4/2026
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]
MI • D
Sponsored 5/4/2026
Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]
VA • D
Sponsored 5/4/2026
Rep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]
WA • D
Sponsored 5/7/2026
Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]
NY • D
Sponsored 5/7/2026
Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6]
MA • D
Sponsored 5/7/2026
Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2]
RI • D
Sponsored 5/7/2026
Rep. Auchincloss, Jake [D-MA-4]
MA • D
Sponsored 5/7/2026
Rep. Trahan, Lori [D-MA-3]
MA • D
Sponsored 5/7/2026
Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]
IL • D
Sponsored 5/11/2026
Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]
NH • D
Sponsored 5/11/2026
Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]
CT • D
Sponsored 5/12/2026
Rep. Brownley, Julia [D-CA-26]
CA • D
Sponsored 5/12/2026
Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35]
CA • D
Sponsored 5/13/2026
Rep. Davids, Sharice [D-KS-3]
KS • D
Sponsored 5/13/2026
Rep. Grijalva, Adelita S. [D-AZ-7]
AZ • D
Sponsored 5/15/2026
Rep. Crow, Jason [D-CO-6]
CO • D
Sponsored 5/20/2026
Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2]
NM • D
Sponsored 5/29/2026
Rep. Lynch, Stephen F. [D-MA-8]
MA • D
Sponsored 6/3/2026
Rep. Craig, Angie [D-MN-2]
MN • D
Sponsored 6/3/2026
Rep. Levin, Mike [D-CA-49]
CA • D
Sponsored 6/9/2026
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]
WI • D
Sponsored 6/9/2026
Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2]
CA • D
Sponsored 6/18/2026
Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]
CA • D
Sponsored 6/23/2026
Rep. Castro, Joaquin [D-TX-20]
TX • D
Sponsored 7/20/2026
Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]
FL • R
Sponsored 8/27/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov