Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act
Sponsored By: Senator Cornyn, John [R-TX]
Passed Senate
Summary
Limits how many patents a biologic drug maker can assert against a biosimilar applicant. The bill would cap certain patent assertions in biosimilar litigation while also expanding the kinds of patents that can be claimed to include manufacturing-method and manufacturing-product patents.
Show full summary
- If a biosimilar applicant completes the information-sharing steps under the FDA biosimilar pathway, the reference product sponsor may assert up to 20 patents in an infringement suit and no more than 10 of those may have issued after a specified date.
- Only patents that are listed and that either were filed more than four years after the reference product’s approval or claim a manufacturing-process method not used by the reference sponsor count toward the cap, narrowing some late-filed patent claims.
- Courts can increase the cap for the interest of justice or for good cause and may consider whether the reference sponsor gave a reasonable description of extra information needed to support additional infringement claims.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
Limits and new rules for biosimilar patents
If enacted, this would set a 20-patent cap for lawsuits tied to an FDA biosimilar application filed after enactment. No more than 10 of those could be later-issued patents listed after the post-approval listing date in the biologics law. The cap would not cover patents on methods of using the drug for treatment, diagnosis, or prevention. The cap would apply only if the biosimilar maker completes the required patent information exchange, list sharing, negotiation, and notice steps in the biologics process. Courts would be able to raise the cap for good cause, such as missing information from the applicant, major changes to the product or process, or patent-office delays. The bill would also confirm that infringement in these cases would include patents on the drug, its uses, and the methods or products used to make it.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Cornyn, John [R-TX]
TX • R
Cosponsors
Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]
CT • D
Sponsored 3/13/2025
Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]
IA • R
Sponsored 3/13/2025
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
IL • D
Sponsored 3/13/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov