All Roll Calls
Yes: 626 • No: 291
Sponsored By: Senator Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]
Became Law
This law creates a _national regulatory framework for payment stablecoins_. It limits who may issue U.S. payment stablecoins and requires one-to-one reserves, monthly disclosure, audits, anti-money-laundering controls, and clear redemption rules.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
10 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 2 costs, 7 mixed.
Each payment stablecoin is backed 1‑to‑1 by safe assets like U.S. cash, insured deposits, or Treasuries with 93 days or less to maturity. Issuers must post month‑end totals and reserve makeup every month, and a public accountant must examine each monthly report. CEOs and CFOs must certify these reports, and issuers over $50 billion must publish annual audited GAAP statements. Reserves cannot be reused except for narrow needs like margin, standard custody, or short‑term repos of 93 days or less that are cleared or pre‑approved. Issuers must publish clear redemption rules and give at least 7 days’ notice before changing fees. Issuers cannot pay interest or yield just for holding a stablecoin, and they cannot imply U.S. government backing in their names or ads.
If a permitted issuer goes insolvent, holders share first in the required reserves, pro rata. If reserves fall short, holders get a top claim on the estate to the extent more reserves should have been held. Redemptions from required reserves are not blocked by the usual bankruptcy pause, and courts aim to start payouts within 14 days after the required hearing when the issuer files the needed papers. Custody assets are not recorded as a custodian’s liabilities, and capital is only required to cover operational risk. Stablecoins from non‑permitted issuers are not cash equivalents and cannot be used as margin or wholesale settlement assets.
The law makes it illegal to issue payment stablecoins unless you are a permitted issuer. Regulators must accept applications, say within 30 days if they are complete, and decide within 120 days. They can deny only for unsafe or unsound activity and must give written reasons and steps to fix it. Applicants can request a hearing within 30 days of a denial. Issuing on a public or decentralized network is not a valid reason to deny. Non‑financial public companies cannot issue unless a committee unanimously finds no material risk and will publish guidance within 1 year.
Breaking the law can bring big fines and even jail. Issuance and related violations can cost up to $100,000 per day. Foreign issuers that keep offering after a noncompliance finding face up to $1,000,000 per violation per day. Platforms that break Treasury bans can face $100,000 per violation per day. People who knowingly violate can face up to $1,000,000 in fines and up to 5 years in prison. Regulators can seek injunctions, issue temporary cease‑and‑desist orders for urgent risks, and remove or bar officers who knowingly violate. In emergencies, federal regulators can order State issuers to limit redemptions or risky affiliate deals after notice; such orders lapse if not affirmed within 10 days.
Three years after enactment, platforms in the U.S. cannot offer payment stablecoins unless they are from permitted issuers. A foreign issuer can be offered here only if Treasury finds its home rules comparable, it registers with the Comptroller, and it holds U.S. reserves for U.S. customers unless a reciprocity deal applies. Registration is deemed approved after 30 days unless rejected; Treasury must publish comparability findings and decide within 210 days. If a foreign issuer stays noncompliant 30 days after notice, Treasury can ban U.S. secondary trading 30 days after publishing the finding. Treasury can grant narrow safe harbors and waivers or licenses and must report waivers within 7 days.
Federal regulators must examine permitted issuers, get needed reports, and avoid duplicate exams. They must finish implementing rules within 1 year and report to Congress within 180 days after the effective date. Regulators, with NIST and standards groups, must assess and may set interoperability standards using notice‑and‑comment rulemaking so permitted stablecoins can work across networks.
Issuers with $10 billion or less in stablecoins can operate under a certified State regime that is substantially similar to federal rules. Treasury sets the principles for “substantially similar” by rule. States must seek certification within 1 year after the effective date, and a review committee must decide within 30 days; denials give at least 180 days to fix issues. If an issuer grows above $10 billion, it has 360 days to join the federal framework or must stop issuing new coins until it drops below $10 billion.
Permitted issuers are treated as financial institutions under anti‑money‑laundering laws. They must verify customers, keep records, monitor and report suspicious activity, and be able to block or freeze illegal transactions. Treasury opens a 60‑day public comment 30 days after enactment, then reports to Congress within 180 days. FinCEN must issue guidance and start rulemaking within 3 years to set standards, including for DeFi risks.
The law does not block three narrow actions. You can send coins directly to another person without an intermediary. You can move your assets between your U.S. account and your foreign account if both are from the same parent company. You can use your own software or hardware wallet for self‑custody.
Federal public financial disclosure filers must list permitted payment stablecoins that add up to $5,000 or less. This rule takes effect no later than 18 months after enactment or 120 days after final rules, whichever is earlier.
Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]
TN • R
Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]
WY • R
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Scott, Tim [R-SC]
SC • R
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Sullivan, Dan [R-AK]
AK • R
Sponsored 5/7/2025
Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]
OH • R
Sponsored 6/17/2025
Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE]
NE • R
Sponsored 6/17/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 626 • No: 291
house vote • 7/17/2025
On Passage
Yes: 308 • No: 122
senate vote • 6/17/2025
On Passage of the Bill S. 1582
Yes: 68 • No: 30
senate vote • 6/12/2025
On the Cloture Motion S. 1582
Yes: 67 • No: 27
senate vote • 5/21/2025
On the Motion to Proceed S. 1582
Yes: 69 • No: 31
senate vote • 5/19/2025
On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 1582
Yes: 66 • No: 32
senate vote • 5/8/2025
On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 1582
Yes: 48 • No: 49
119-s-3752, SAVE America Act
Would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship and a tangible photo ID to register and vote in federal elections. It would create a nationwide verification system using DHS SAVE, Social Security Administration checks, and state DMV and other databases and would expand removal rules, private lawsuits, and criminal penalties for registration violations. - Voters and registrants: People seeking to register for federal office would need to present listed documents such as a U.S. passport, REAL ID showing citizenship, naturalization certificate, or certified birth records. Those without documents could use a uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury as an alternative. - State and election agencies: Motor vehicle agencies and voter registration offices would have to collect and verify documentary proof and regularly cross-check SAVE, SSA, and state records. Federal departments would be required to provide verification data on request and, where practicable, within 24 hours to support verification. - Voting process and enforcement: In-person voters would need a tangible photo ID and absentee voters would include an ID copy with requests and ballots. The bill would add a mechanism to remove registrants verified as noncitizens and broaden private rights of action and criminal penalties for assisting improper registration.
119-s-5025, Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia Act of 2026
A mandatory, recurring sanctions regime targeting Russia's government, banks, energy projects, and maritime networks. The bill would require presidential reviews every 180 days and would compel blocking of property, vessel-focused sanctions, bans on new investment, tighter financial messaging restrictions, and steep import duties.
119-s-401, Fair Access to Banking Act
Guarantees fair, impartial access to basic financial services. This bill would limit when banks, credit unions, and payment networks can refuse to serve a person who is acting lawfully by requiring denials to rest on documented, quantitative, risk-based standards and by creating penalties and a private lawsuit tool for violations. - Large banks would face limits on Federal Reserve discount window access and Automated Clearing House network use if they refuse to serve lawful customers without objective, pre-established risk reasons. Covered banks are presumed to be those with more than $10.0 billion in assets. - Payment card networks and credit unions would be barred from blocking access based on political or reputational risk. Card networks face civil penalties up to 10% of the value of affected services or $10,000 per violation. - Individuals and businesses denied services in violation of the bill would get a private right of action in federal court. Successful plaintiffs could recover attorney fees, costs, and treble damages.
119-s-186, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025
Blocks federal funding for abortions and for health plans that cover abortion. The bill would permanently ban the use of federal funds for abortions or for any health plan paid for in whole or in part with federal money and would bar abortions in federal facilities or by federal employees. - Families and marketplace enrollees would not be able to use premium tax credits or cost‑sharing reductions to buy plans that include abortion. They could purchase a separate abortion-only plan but would receive no federal subsidy for that coverage. - People who receive care in federal facilities and anyone served by federal employees would not get abortions paid for with federal funds. The bill extends funding restrictions to federal trust funds and the District of Columbia. Exceptions are preserved for rape, incest, and life‑threatening conditions. - Employers and insurers would face new rules. Plans that include abortion would be excluded from the small employer health insurance credit. Qualified health plans and marketplace materials would have to prominently disclose whether they cover abortion and any separate surcharge for that coverage.
119-s-6, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
This bill would require health care practitioners to give the same standard of care and immediate hospital admission for infants born alive after an abortion. It would also create mandatory reporting rules and civil and criminal penalties for failures. - Health care practitioners: Would have to provide the same professional care any newborn at the same gestational age would receive and ensure immediate hospital admission. Violations can lead to fines or up to 5 years in prison. - Clinic and hospital staff: Anyone who knows a practitioner failed to meet the care rules must immediately report that failure to state or federal law enforcement. - Mothers: The woman on whom the abortion was performed could not be prosecuted under this law and may sue providers for violations. - Civil remedies: A successful suit can win verifiable damages for injuries, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. - Homicide exposure: Intentionally killing or attempting to kill an infant born alive would be prosecuted as murder.
119-s-213, Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would make permanent the qualified business income (QBI) deduction that lets many individuals, estates, and trusts deduct up to 20% of qualifying business income. The QBI deduction currently expires after December 31, 2025. The bill would remove that sunset by striking subsection (i) of section 199A. It does not change the deduction's 20% rate, definitions, or existing wage and property limits.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo