Reduction in Force Review Act
Sponsored By: Senator Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
Introduced
Summary
Stronger review and mandatory justification for federal reductions in force. This bill would require agencies to explain why they are cutting jobs and treat big workforce moves as reviewable rules under Chapter 8 of title 5. It expands review to cover actions like restructuring and office closures that materially affect employees.
Show full summary
- Federal employees: Agencies would have to provide a detailed written justification whenever a rule relates to a reduction in force. That justification must explain the reasons, the expected effects on employees and operations, and alternatives considered.
- Veterans: Agencies must include a summary of how a proposed reduction in force will affect agency employees who are veterans.
- Agencies and affected non-federal parties: The bill would redefine “rule” to include significant actions that substantially affect non-federal parties, such as workforce restructuring or office closures, making those actions subject to Chapter 8 review.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
Agencies must explain planned layoffs
If enacted, this bill would require federal agencies covered by Chapter 8 to include a detailed justification whenever a rule relates to a reduction in force. The justification would have to say the specific reasons for the layoff and the expected effects on employees and agency operations. Agencies would have to list alternatives they considered and explain why they rejected them. Agencies would have to summarize talks with affected employees and their representatives and describe impacts on agency employees who are veterans. The bill would also expand the definition of "rule" to cover major actions that substantially affect non-federal parties, like workforce restructuring or office closures. This would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
OR • D
Cosponsors
Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]
MD • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]
VA • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]
VT • I
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA]
VA • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD]
MD • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]
OR • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
IL • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]
CA • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
WI • D
Sponsored 5/1/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov