Shadow Docket Sunlight Act of 2025
Sponsored By: Senator Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]
Introduced
Summary
Public written explanations and recorded votes for Supreme Court orders on preliminary injunctions and stays. This bill would require the Court to publish a written explanation for any order granting, denying, or vacating preliminary injunctive relief or a stay and to disclose how each participating justice voted.
Show full summary
- Litigants: Would receive written assessments that address four legal factors for injunctions and four for stays. The rule applies to cases within the Court's appellate jurisdiction and to claims under Title 5, chapters 5 and 7.
- Public and reporters: Would get clearer reasons and vote counts for orders often called the "shadow docket," making emergency decisions easier to analyze.
- Federal Judicial Center and Congress: Would require the Center's Director to report to Congress on compliance, with the first report due by April 1 of the first year that begins more than 180 days after enactment and then every two years. The Director may request extra time for the first report and must state the amount needed in writing.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
More Supreme Court emergency transparency
This bill would require the Supreme Court to publish a written explanation for orders that grant, deny, or vacate preliminary injunctions or stays in appellate cases. The Court would also have to say in writing how each participating justice voted. For injunction orders, the explanation would have to address four things: likelihood of success on the merits, likelihood of irreparable harm without relief, whether the balance of equities favors the applicant, and whether relief is in the public interest. For stays, the explanation would have to assess likelihood of success, irreparable injury to the stay applicant without a stay, whether issuing the stay would substantially harm other parties, and whether a stay is in the public interest. The requirement could be satisfied by one or more opinions representing a majority, and it would not apply to administrative or scheduling orders or to certiorari petitions that do not grant, deny, or vacate injunctions or stays.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]
CT • D
Cosponsors
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
NJ • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
IL • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]
MN • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]
CA • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI]
RI • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]
VT • I
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]
CA • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY]
NY • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]
MN • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]
VT • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]
RI • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]
OR • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]
HI • D
Sponsored 5/12/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov