No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act
Sponsored By: Senator Risch, James E. [R-ID]
Introduced
Summary
Denies federal funds to ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions that restrict cooperation on immigration detainers. It would bar those jurisdictions from getting federal money meant to benefit people in the U.S. without lawful status and set up annual DHS reporting on noncompliance.
Show full summary
- Local governments labeled as sanctuary jurisdictions would become ineligible for federal funds intended to benefit undocumented immigrants, including money for food, shelter, healthcare, legal services, and transportation.
- Residents without lawful status and the local providers who serve them could see reduced federal-supported services in affected areas, which may shrink access to basic care and legal help.
- The Department of Homeland Security would be required to submit a report to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees within one year and then annually naming states and political subdivisions that failed to comply with DHS detainer-related requests.
- A narrow exception says a state or locality is not a sanctuary jurisdiction solely because officials will not share information or honor a detainer for someone who comes forward as a victim or witness of a crime.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 1 costs, 0 mixed.
Ban federal funds for sanctuary jurisdictions
If enacted, the bill would ban federal funds to any State or local area labeled a "sanctuary jurisdiction." The bill would define a sanctuary jurisdiction as a place that bars sharing a person's immigration or citizenship status or refuses certain Homeland Security detainer or release-notice requests. It would not count an area as a sanctuary jurisdiction solely for declining to share information or comply with a detainer for someone who comes forward as a victim or witness. The funding ban would start 60 days after enactment or on the first day of the next fiscal year, whichever is earlier. If passed, this could cut federal money used for food, shelter, health care, legal help, and transportation for people without lawful immigration status and may force local budgets to cover those costs or reduce services.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Risch, James E. [R-ID]
ID • R
Cosponsors
Sen. Crapo, Mike [R-ID]
ID • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]
MO • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
MT • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]
UT • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]
MT • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE]
NE • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]
IN • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy [R-MS]
MS • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]
WY • R
Sponsored 2/26/2025
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]
FL • R
Sponsored 2/26/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov