Eric’s Law
Sponsored By: Senator Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
Introduced
Summary
A new special sentencing hearing and second jury would be required after a non‑unanimous federal capital-sentencing recommendation if the government asks for it. If that second jury also fails to unanimously recommend death, the court would be prohibited from imposing a death sentence and must impose another lawful sentence.
Show full summary
- Defendants in death-eligible cases would get an automatic second sentencing jury when the first jury is not unanimous. If the second jury deadlocks the death penalty cannot be imposed.
- Federal prosecutors would gain a clear, statutory path to seek a new hearing and fresh jury by moving for the special procedure after a non-unanimous recommendation.
- Courts would be required to impanel the second jury and then impose a non-death sentence if unanimity still is not reached, adding a mandatory procedural step in capital sentencing.
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
New jury step in federal death cases
If enacted, this bill would change federal capital sentencing when juries do not reach a unanimous recommendation. If the first jury is not unanimous, prosecutors could ask for a new sentencing hearing. The court would have to hold that special hearing and seat a fresh jury when the government moves. If the second jury also fails to agree unanimously, the court would impose a sentence other than death. This change would take effect upon enactment.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
TX • R
Cosponsors
Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE]
NE • R
Sponsored 2/25/2025
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov