All Roll Calls
Yes: 46 • No: 50
Sponsored By: Senator Wyden, Ron [D-OR]
In Committee
Nullifies CMS's WISeR prior authorization rule.
The bill would disapprove the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rule titled Medicare Program: Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model. Such rule would have no force or effect.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Wyden, Ron [D-OR]
OR • D
Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
WI • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Kim, Andy [D-NJ]
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]
VT • I
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA]
MA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA]
VA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]
MN • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Luján, Ben Ray [D-NM]
NM • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]
OR • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]
IL • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]
NH • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]
WA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]
WA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]
CT • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY]
NY • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Gallego, Ruben [D-AZ]
AZ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]
AZ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
NJ • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]
MA • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL]
IL • D
Sponsored 6/24/2026
Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]
MD • D
Sponsored 7/14/2026
Sen. Ossoff, Jon [D-GA]
GA • D
Sponsored 7/14/2026
All Roll Calls
Yes: 46 • No: 50
senate vote • 7/16/2026
On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 198
Yes: 46 • No: 50
119-s-5108, Right to IVF Act of 2026
Establishes a federal right to access assisted reproductive technology (ART) and intrauterine insemination (IUI). It would protect patients and willing providers to seek, offer, and make medical decisions about eggs, sperm, and embryos while overriding state limits that conflict with clinical guidance. - Families and patients: Would create a statutory right to pursue ART/IUI and to control donation, testing, storage, and disposition of reproductive material. It would also allow individuals and providers to bring private lawsuits for damages and equitable relief. - Active-duty service members and military families: Would require the Department of Defense to provide ART/IUI and fertility preservation for eligible active-duty members. It allows up to three completed oocyte retrievals, unlimited embryo transfers, funds donor procurement, and pays for storage and transport for one year after separation. - Veterans, insurers, and employers: Would add ART/IUI into Veterans Affairs medical services and require group health plans to cover ART and IUI with cost-sharing no more restrictive than other medical care. Plans must notify enrollees and the rule applies to plan years beginning six months after enactment.
119-s-1503, Equality Act
Treat sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination across federal law. The bill would explicitly add sexual orientation and gender identity to federal sex‑discrimination protections and apply those rules across many statutes and programs.
119-s-5066, Health Equity and Accountability Act of 2026
This bill would center federal health policy on expanding access and closing disparities by making health equity a cross‑cutting requirement and by boosting coverage, nutrition, workforce, and data systems. It pairs new demographic data standards with large program expansions for children, seniors, noncitizens, and priority diseases.
119-s-2150, Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
Guarantee nationwide protections for a person's right to obtain abortion services and a provider's right to deliver them. The Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 would create a federal rule that stops laws and rules that single out abortion or place heavier burdens on abortion than on similar medical procedures. It defines key terms, protects pre-viability care, allows post-viability care to protect life or health, and explicitly protects interstate travel and the movement of medicines, equipment, patients, and providers. - Families and patients: Would protect access to abortion before viability and allow post-viability care when needed to protect life or health. It would bar medically unnecessary in-person visit rules and stop forced disclosure of why a patient seeks care. - Health care providers: Would protect providers' ability to give abortion care including by telemedicine and across state lines, and would forbid facility, staffing, testing, or disclosure requirements that are not required for similar procedures. - States and interstate commerce: Would preempt conflicting state laws and recognize a right to travel and to assist others in getting reproductive health services across state lines. - Courts and enforcement: Would let the Attorney General sue and would create a private right of action so patients and providers can seek injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It would limit state sovereign immunity where federal law allows challenges.
119-s-2523, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore and strengthen federal voting-rights protections by rewriting Section 2, creating a practice-based preclearance process for certain election changes, and boosting transparency and enforcement. - Voters in racial, language-minority, and Tribal communities would gain broader legal standards to challenge discrimination. The bill would add distinct Section 2 tests for vote-dilution, vote-denial, and intentional discrimination and add a retrogression standard that applies to actions taken on or after 2021. - State and local election officials would face new preclearance and public-notice rules. Covered changes like election methods, redistricting shifts, ID rules, polling-place moves, and voter-list removals would need review before implementation and require pre-election notices 30 days before Federal elections with 48-hour updates. - The Department of Justice and private citizens would get stronger tools to enforce rights. The Attorney General would centralize observers, extend bilingual protections to 2037, seek preventive relief, issue pre-action information demands, and pursue expanded court remedies.
119-s-3990, PrEP Access and Coverage Act of 2026
Guarantees no-cost access to PrEP and PEP across public and private health coverage. This bill would require plans to cover FDA-approved HIV prevention drugs, diagnostics, counseling, and follow-up, ban most prior authorization rules, strengthen privacy for family plans, bar insurers from penalizing people who take PrEP/PEP, and fund grants and education to boost access and uptake. - People and families would get FDA-approved PrEP and PEP plus related tests, counseling, lab work, and adherence services with no cost-sharing in covered plans and, for most plans, no prior authorization. It would also keep PrEP/PEP use private within family health plans so other enrollees do not see that information. - Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, VA, and DoD beneficiaries would see expanded prevention coverage. Medicare would add prevention services to Part B with no coinsurance or deductible and place prevention drugs in Part D with zero cost-sharing for plan years after January 1, 2027, while Medicaid and CHIP would align coverage and VA and DoD would remove cost-sharing as specified. - States, tribes, community health centers, rural clinics, and nonprofit providers would be eligible for grants to pay for drugs, testing, outreach, administration, and adherence services, with programs required within 1 year of enactment. The bill would fund national public and provider education campaigns through FY2026–2030 and require evaluations and annual reports for five years.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo