All Roll Calls
Yes: 140 • No: 55
Sponsored By: Senator Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
Passed Senate
Nullifies the IRS rule requiring gross-proceeds reporting by brokers that facilitate digital-asset sales. It disapproves the rule published at 89 Fed. Reg. 106928 and prevents those proposed reporting requirements from taking effect, leaving current reporting practices unchanged.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
This bill would void an IRS rule on digital‑asset broker reporting. It targets the rule titled “Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales,” published December 30, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 106,928). If enacted, the rule would have no force or effect. Brokers that regularly handle crypto sales would not have that new gross‑proceeds reporting duty. People using those brokers would not have their sale amounts reported under that rule.
Cruz, Ted [R-TX]
TX • R
Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]
WY • R
Sponsored 1/21/2025
Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]
TN • R
Sponsored 1/21/2025
Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]
NC • R
Sponsored 1/21/2025
Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]
MT • R
Sponsored 1/21/2025
Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]
NC • R
Sponsored 1/21/2025
Sen. Moreno, Bernie [R-OH]
OH • R
Sponsored 1/24/2025
Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]
UT • R
Sponsored 1/28/2025
Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]
AR • R
Sponsored 1/28/2025
Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]
UT • R
Sponsored 1/28/2025
Sen. Banks, Jim [R-IN]
IN • R
Sponsored 2/3/2025
Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]
MT • R
Sponsored 2/4/2025
Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]
TN • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Sen. Scott, Tim [R-SC]
SC • R
Sponsored 2/20/2025
Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]
PA • R
Sponsored 3/4/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 140 • No: 55
senate vote • 3/4/2025
On the Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 3
Yes: 70 • No: 27
senate vote • 3/4/2025
On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 3
Yes: 70 • No: 28
119-s-1071, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
Authorizes FY2026 defense funding and wide-ranging national security reforms. This law funds military operations, reshapes acquisition, and sets specific nuclear and industrial priorities across the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA). - Military families and households: Improves housing oversight, expands childcare pilots and parental leave, and authorizes about $17.5 billion for military construction to support family housing and base projects. - Service members and personnel: Sets FY2026 end strengths and funds pay and benefits with a military personnel authorization around $193.2 billion, while strengthening medical access, mental‑health support, and sexual‑assault forensic care. - Defense industrial base and nuclear stockpile: Rewrites procurement toward "best value," enables multiyear buys and supply‑chain limits on foreign components, and requires DOE/NNSA war‑reserve pit production targets of at least 30 pits in 2026 and 80 by 2030.
119-s-587, Death Tax Repeal Act of 2025
Repeal of the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes. This bill would eliminate those transfer taxes for decedents dying and GST transfers occurring after enactment and would overhaul the gift tax to raise the lifetime exemption and add a new tiered rate schedule. - Families and heirs: Heirs of people who die after enactment would no longer face the federal estate tax or the generation-skipping transfer tax. - Donors and trusts: The lifetime gift exemption would rise to $10 million, indexed for inflation, and gift tax rates would be rewritten into brackets that range from 18% up to 35% for the largest gifts. Trust transfers would be treated as taxable gifts unless the trust is wholly owned by the donor or the donor's spouse. - Implementation and timing: The changes would apply to gifts made and transfers occurring on or after enactment and include a transition rule that treats the calendar year of enactment as two separate periods for certain tax provisions.
119-s-186, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2025
Blocks federal funding for abortions and for health plans that cover abortion. The bill would permanently ban the use of federal funds for abortions or for any health plan paid for in whole or in part with federal money and would bar abortions in federal facilities or by federal employees. - Families and marketplace enrollees would not be able to use premium tax credits or cost‑sharing reductions to buy plans that include abortion. They could purchase a separate abortion-only plan but would receive no federal subsidy for that coverage. - People who receive care in federal facilities and anyone served by federal employees would not get abortions paid for with federal funds. The bill extends funding restrictions to federal trust funds and the District of Columbia. Exceptions are preserved for rape, incest, and life‑threatening conditions. - Employers and insurers would face new rules. Plans that include abortion would be excluded from the small employer health insurance credit. Qualified health plans and marketplace materials would have to prominently disclose whether they cover abortion and any separate surcharge for that coverage.
119-s-6, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
This bill would require health care practitioners to give the same standard of care and immediate hospital admission for infants born alive after an abortion. It would also create mandatory reporting rules and civil and criminal penalties for failures. - Health care practitioners: Would have to provide the same professional care any newborn at the same gestational age would receive and ensure immediate hospital admission. Violations can lead to fines or up to 5 years in prison. - Clinic and hospital staff: Anyone who knows a practitioner failed to meet the care rules must immediately report that failure to state or federal law enforcement. - Mothers: The woman on whom the abortion was performed could not be prosecuted under this law and may sue providers for violations. - Civil remedies: A successful suit can win verifiable damages for injuries, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. - Homicide exposure: Intentionally killing or attempting to kill an infant born alive would be prosecuted as murder.
119-s-213, Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would make permanent the qualified business income (QBI) deduction that lets many individuals, estates, and trusts deduct up to 20% of qualifying business income. The QBI deduction currently expires after December 31, 2025. The bill would remove that sunset by striking subsection (i) of section 199A. It does not change the deduction's 20% rate, definitions, or existing wage and property limits.
119-s-128, SAVE Act
Requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration. This bill would bar states from processing any application for a federal election unless the applicant presents specified citizenship documents and would add verification, information-sharing, removal, and enforcement rules to the voter registration system. - Prospective voters: People applying to register for a federal election would need to present specified documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when they apply, whether by mail, online, in person, or at the polling place. States must provide an alternate uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury for applicants who cannot produce documents. - State agencies and driver license offices: States would be required to verify citizenship during driver’s license issuance or renewal and to link those checks to voter registration records. The bill would require states to create programs to identify and remove noncitizens and sets implementation timing, including a 30-day program deadline and a 60-day early-adoption window. - Election officials, enforcement, and naturalization: The bill would expand criminal penalties and create a private right of action against officials who register applicants without required proof. It also directs the Department of Homeland Security to notify state election officials of naturalizations and preserves the ability to cast provisional ballots while citizenship is verified.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo