All Roll Calls
Yes: 25 • No: 72
Sponsored By: Senator Kennedy, John [R-LA]
In Committee
Disapproves the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Record of Decision for the Barred Owl Management Strategy in Washington, Oregon, and California. The resolution nullifies that record of decision under the Congressional Review Act so the barred owl management rule for those states shall have no force or effect.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
This bill would disapprove a Fish and Wildlife Service decision called the Barred Owl Management Strategy. That decision was issued on September 6, 2024. A GAO letter dated May 28, 2025, printed July 10, 2025, found it counts as a rule. If enacted, the rule would have no force or effect upon enactment. Landowners, timber operators, state and tribal wildlife agencies, and conservation groups in Washington, Oregon, and California could see regulatory obligations change.
Kennedy, John [R-LA]
LA • R
Sen. Paul, Rand [R-KY]
KY • R
Sponsored 7/24/2025
Sen. Britt, Katie Boyd [R-AL]
AL • R
Sponsored 7/29/2025
Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]
FL • R
Sponsored 9/2/2025
Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]
TN • R
Sponsored 9/3/2025
Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK]
OK • R
Sponsored 10/9/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 25 • No: 72
senate vote • 10/29/2025
On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 69
Yes: 25 • No: 72
119-s-3752, SAVE America Act
Would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship and a tangible photo ID to register and vote in federal elections. It would create a nationwide verification system using DHS SAVE, Social Security Administration checks, and state DMV and other databases and would expand removal rules, private lawsuits, and criminal penalties for registration violations. - Voters and registrants: People seeking to register for federal office would need to present listed documents such as a U.S. passport, REAL ID showing citizenship, naturalization certificate, or certified birth records. Those without documents could use a uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury as an alternative. - State and election agencies: Motor vehicle agencies and voter registration offices would have to collect and verify documentary proof and regularly cross-check SAVE, SSA, and state records. Federal departments would be required to provide verification data on request and, where practicable, within 24 hours to support verification. - Voting process and enforcement: In-person voters would need a tangible photo ID and absentee voters would include an ID copy with requests and ballots. The bill would add a mechanism to remove registrants verified as noncitizens and broaden private rights of action and criminal penalties for assisting improper registration.
119-s-6, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
This bill would require health care practitioners to give the same standard of care and immediate hospital admission for infants born alive after an abortion. It would also create mandatory reporting rules and civil and criminal penalties for failures. - Health care practitioners: Would have to provide the same professional care any newborn at the same gestational age would receive and ensure immediate hospital admission. Violations can lead to fines or up to 5 years in prison. - Clinic and hospital staff: Anyone who knows a practitioner failed to meet the care rules must immediately report that failure to state or federal law enforcement. - Mothers: The woman on whom the abortion was performed could not be prosecuted under this law and may sue providers for violations. - Civil remedies: A successful suit can win verifiable damages for injuries, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. - Homicide exposure: Intentionally killing or attempting to kill an infant born alive would be prosecuted as murder.
119-s-9, Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025
This bill would bar anyone whose biological sex at birth was male from competing in school athletic programs that are designated for women or girls. It defines sex for Title IX purposes solely by a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth. - Female students: Teams designated for women or girls would be limited to students whose sex at birth is female, changing who is eligible to join those teams. - Transgender girls and women who were male at birth: They would be excluded from female-designated athletic programs regardless of gender identity or medical transition. - Federally funded schools and colleges: Recipients of federal funds would have to follow this birth-sex definition in athletics to comply with Title IX.
119-s-478, Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act of 2025
Bars the VA from sending veterans' personally identifying information to the federal background-check system just because a VA-appointed fiduciary manages their benefits. It allows such sharing only if a judge or other judicial authority finds the veteran or beneficiary is a danger to themselves or others. - Veterans and beneficiaries: People with VA-appointed fiduciaries will not have their personal data sent to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System solely for that reason. Only a judicial finding of danger triggers a VA report. - Department of Veterans Affairs and fiduciary payments: The VA is prohibited from transmitting beneficiary personally identifiable information to the Department of Justice for NICS when the VA determines to pay benefits to a fiduciary under chapter 55 of title 38, unless there is a judicial order or finding. - Department of Justice and NICS: The DOJ will not receive VA-originated PII for use by NICS in these fiduciary cases unless a competent judicial authority has found the person dangerous.
119-s-128, SAVE Act
Requires documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal voter registration. This bill would bar states from processing any application for a federal election unless the applicant presents specified citizenship documents and would add verification, information-sharing, removal, and enforcement rules to the voter registration system. - Prospective voters: People applying to register for a federal election would need to present specified documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when they apply, whether by mail, online, in person, or at the polling place. States must provide an alternate uniform affidavit under penalty of perjury for applicants who cannot produce documents. - State agencies and driver license offices: States would be required to verify citizenship during driver’s license issuance or renewal and to link those checks to voter registration records. The bill would require states to create programs to identify and remove noncitizens and sets implementation timing, including a 30-day program deadline and a 60-day early-adoption window. - Election officials, enforcement, and naturalization: The bill would expand criminal penalties and create a private right of action against officials who register applicants without required proof. It also directs the Department of Homeland Security to notify state election officials of naturalizations and preserves the ability to cast provisional ballots while citizenship is verified.
119-s-5, Laken Riley Act
Mandatory detention for certain theft-related offenses. The law requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain non-U.S. nationals who are unlawfully present or lack proper admission documents and who are charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admit to burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. - Non-U.S. nationals: Individuals charged with those offenses can be held, designated as inadmissible when seeking admission, and are subject to a DHS detainer. If not already detained by federal, state, or local officials, DHS must effectively and expeditiously take custody. - States: State attorneys general and other authorized state officers may sue the Secretary of Homeland Security in federal court for injunctive relief when a federal decision or alleged failure causes harm to the state or its residents, including financial harm over $100, and such suits can receive expedited docketing where harm exists. - Federal enforcement and courts: The law codifies a DHS detainer mechanism, emphasizes DHS authority over parole and detention language, and creates a limited set of exceptions governing when injunctive relief is available to states.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
- 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. — Communications Act of 1934: establishes the FCC and its jurisdiction over interstate and foreign communications by wire and radio; the foundational statute for all FCC regu
The Federal Communications Commission — an independent regulatory agency created by the Communications Act of 1934 47 U.S.C. § 151 and substantially restructured by the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
The War Powers Resolution 1973 — enacted over President Nixon's veto and codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548 — is Congress's primary statutory attempt to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. fo