All Roll Calls
Yes: 211 • No: 213
Sponsored By: Representative McGovern
Failed
Remove U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities in or against Venezuela. It would rely on the War Powers Resolution to direct the President to end any use of U.S. Armed Forces in hostilities in or against Venezuela that lack a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, and it includes no funding, timelines, enforcement mechanisms, or application to other countries.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
This resolution sought to require the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in or against Venezuela. It would have applied unless Congress had declared war or passed a law specifically authorizing force. The measure relied on section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution. It named no funding, timelines, enforcement penalties, or targets beyond Venezuela. The main people protected would have been U.S. service members and nearby communities. The resolution failed to pass and did not become law.
McGovern
MA • D
Castro (TX)
TX • D
Sponsored 12/1/2025
Khanna
CA • D
Sponsored 12/1/2025
Rep. Jacobs, Sara [D-CA-51]
CA • D
Sponsored 12/1/2025
Rep. Kamlager-Dove, Sydney [D-CA-37]
CA • D
Sponsored 12/1/2025
Rep. Massie, Thomas [R-KY-4]
KY • R
Sponsored 12/2/2025
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
DC • D
Sponsored 12/3/2025
Rep. Doggett, Lloyd [D-TX-37]
TX • D
Sponsored 12/3/2025
Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]
PA • D
Sponsored 12/4/2025
Rep. Pocan, Mark [D-WI-2]
WI • D
Sponsored 12/4/2025
Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]
NY • D
Sponsored 12/4/2025
Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]
NE • R
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]
NY • D
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-39]
CA • D
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Smith (WA)
WA • D
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Rep. García, Jesús G. "Chuy" [D-IL-4]
IL • D
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Rep. Salinas, Andrea [D-OR-6]
OR • D
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY-12]
NY • D
Sponsored 12/5/2025
Rep. Thanedar, Shri [D-MI-13]
MI • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]
WI • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12]
MI • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Casar, Greg [D-TX-35]
TX • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Davids, Sharice [D-KS-3]
KS • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7]
WA • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]
VA • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Rep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5]
MN • D
Sponsored 12/9/2025
Liccardo
CA • D
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Greene (GA)
GA • R
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
NY • D
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Rep. Dexter, Maxine [D-OR-3]
OR • D
Sponsored 12/10/2025
Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]
FL • D
Sponsored 12/11/2025
Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4]
NC • D
Sponsored 12/12/2025
Randall
WA • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Fletcher
TX • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Ocasio-Cortez
NY • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Ramirez, Delia C. [D-IL-3]
IL • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Mfume
MD • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
PA • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2]
CT • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]
PA • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Leger Fernandez, Teresa [D-NM-3]
NM • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Ansari, Yassamin [D-AZ-3]
AZ • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Garamendi, John [D-CA-8]
CA • D
Sponsored 12/15/2025
Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]
NH • D
Sponsored 12/16/2025
Espaillat
NY • D
Sponsored 12/16/2025
Rep. Hoyle, Val T. [D-OR-4]
OR • D
Sponsored 12/16/2025
Stansbury
NM • D
Sponsored 12/17/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 211 • No: 213
house vote • 12/17/2025
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Yes: 211 • No: 213
HR2550, Protect America's Workforce Act
Preserves federal employees' collective bargaining agreements. This Act nullifies the Executive Order titled "Exclusions from Federal Labor-Management Relations Programs." - Federal employees and unions: Collective bargaining agreements that were in effect on March 26, 2025 remain valid and continue to apply through each contract's stated term. - Federal agencies and federal funds: Agencies may not obligate or spend federal funds to carry out that Executive Order, and the Executive Order has no force or effect.
HR20, Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
Strengthens worker organizing rights and enforcement. The bill broadens who counts as an employee or joint employer and builds tougher remedies, penalties, and election rules to make organizing and bargaining easier to enforce and monitor. - Workers: Expands who is treated as an employee by tightening the three-part test for independent contractors and broadening the joint-employer test to include direct, indirect, and reserved control. It adds clear protections for strike participation and allows back pay without reduction and liquidated damages equal to twice awarded damages. - Employers: Requires prompt disclosure and new notice duties including a detailed voter list within two business days and multilingual employee notices. Noncompliance can trigger civil penalties including up to $50,000 per unfair labor practice, up to $10,000 per refusal to obey Board orders, and fines for posting or voter-list violations. - Elections, agencies, and unions: NLRB must adopt remote electronic voting within one year and aim to hold elections within twenty business days. The bill also boosts NLRB reporting and transparency, expands private suits, and creates new whistleblower protections and expedited enforcement.
HR1589, American Dream and Promise Act of 2025
New pathways to permanent residence. This bill would create a ten‑year conditional permanent resident status for certain people who entered as children and would add an adjustment pathway for specified Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure holders. - Young long‑term residents and DACA‑eligible people could get a ten‑year conditional status if they meet rules like continuous presence since Jan 1, 2021 and education or credential benchmarks. They could convert to full permanent residence after meeting removal‑of‑condition rules and have limits on removal while applying. - Nationals with qualifying TPS or DED status who meet continuous‑presence rules could apply within a three‑year window and face a capped application fee of $1,140. - The bill creates a competitive grant program to help applicants, allows fee exemptions for youth, low‑income people, foster care alumni, and those with serious disabilities, and adds a $25 supplemental surcharge to fund appointed counsel.
HR15, Equality Act
Adds sexual orientation and gender identity to the federal definition of sex and creates a uniform, nationwide nondiscrimination framework across employment, housing, credit, education, public accommodations, jury service, and programs that receive federal funds. The bill would harmonize definitions, remedies, and rules of construction across multiple civil rights statutes to make enforcement and claims more consistent. - Workers: Private and federal employees would gain explicit protection from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would update Title VII rules, expand remedies, and adjust bona fide occupational qualification rules to account for gender identity. - People using public places, students, and tenants: Public accommodations and education laws would explicitly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fair Housing Act would adopt the same definitions and protections to cover renters and buyers. - Borrowers, juries, and enforcement: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act would bar credit discrimination on these bases. Jury selection rules would be updated to prevent discrimination. The bill would also prevent the Religious Freedom Restoration Act from being used to challenge enforcement under the covered civil rights laws.
HR14, John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025
This bill would restore robust federal oversight of voting rights by rewriting Section 2 and creating a broad practice-based preclearance system. It sets new tests for vote-dilution and vote-denial claims, adds retrogression rules for actions on or after January 1, 2021, and requires extensive public notice, data disclosure, and observer powers. - Minority and language-minority voters: Provides clearer legal paths to challenge districting and practices that dilute or abridge votes, recognizes coalitions of minority groups, and applies retrogression rules to actions from January 1, 2021. - States and local election officials: Triggers preclearance using a 25-year lookback with numeric thresholds and creates an administrative bailout that requires demonstrating sustained compliance over a 10-year period to avoid coverage. - Enforcement, oversight, and courts: Expands who may sue to include private "aggrieved persons", centralizes observer authority in the Attorney General, and authorizes pre-suit inspection and information demands that courts may enforce or modify.
HR12, Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025
This bill would protect access to abortion before viability nationwide. It would block state rules that single out abortion, safeguard telemedicine and medication abortion, and protect the right to travel for care. - People seeking care and families: Would be able to obtain abortion prior to viability without residency limits, medically unnecessary tests, or required in‑person visits. About 63% of terminations are medication abortions and the bill limits extra drug restrictions beyond generally applicable rules. - Health care providers: Would be able to prescribe, dispense, and provide abortion through hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, and telemedicine without facility, staffing, or credential rules that are stricter than comparable procedures. - People in restricted states and cross‑state travelers: Would have a protected right to travel for abortion and to assist others. By January 2025 abortion is unavailable in 14 states and 17.98 million people of reproductive age lack home‑state access, and travel time to facilities has quadrupled since Dobbs. - States and officials: The Attorney General and private parties could sue to enforce the Act, and courts could grant injunctions, declaratory relief, and award costs and reasonable attorney fees.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
The Lacey Act 16 U.S.C. §§ 3371–3378 is America's oldest and broadest wildlife protection law — and since a 2008 amendment, it also covers plants and plant products including timber. Originally enacte
The federal government distributes more than $800 billion per year in grants — more money than the entire U.S. defense discretionary budget — yet most Americans have no mental model of how grant fundi
The U.S. federal government spent approximately $6.75 trillion in FY 2024, making it the world's largest economy in its own right — but most of that money never touches the Treasury in the way most pe
Every AM radio station, FM station, television broadcaster, and noncommercial educational broadcaster in the United States operates under a federal license governed by 47 CFR Part 73 — the FCC's compr