HR3274119th CongressWALLET

Child Care Infrastructure Act

Sponsored By: Representative Clark (MA)

Introduced

Summary

Creates a federal child care infrastructure grant program to fund construction, renovation, and expansion of child care facilities that serve low-income, very young, rural, and other high-need communities. It would pay for planning, testing, and capacity building and require Davis-Bacon wage standards on covered construction work.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this bill affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Bill Overview

Analyzed Economic Effects

4 provisions identified: 3 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.

Grants to expand child care space

If enacted, the bill would put $10 billion into grants from FY 2026 through FY 2030 to build, buy, or improve child care sites. States could get awards for up to five years, capped at $250 million per year, and non-tribal states would need a 10% match. The Secretary would reserve 3% for tribes and 3% for territories. Ten to fifteen percent could fund intermediary groups that provide loans and technical help; any single intermediary grant would be capped at $15 million. Plans that cover center and home-based care and reach urban, suburban, and rural areas would be favored.

Nationwide review of child care facilities

If enacted, the Secretary would run two studies of child care facilities. The first, done with the first grant cycle, would review current needs and COVID-19 effects, with a public report due within one year of enactment. The second, longer study would report within four years. No more than $5 million of program funds could be used for the immediate study. A final public report on grant effects would be due by the end of FY 2030.

More access for tribes and territories

If enacted, tribes and the Northern Mariana Islands would count as “States” for this program, so they could apply directly. Program grants to territories would not count against the Social Security Act cap on total territorial payments. This would help tribes and territories access the full grant funding.

Prevailing wages on child care projects

If enacted, any construction or renovation paid with these grants would have to pay local Davis–Bacon prevailing wages. Applicants would need to promise compliance before funds are approved. The Labor Department would enforce this rule. This could raise pay for workers and could raise some project costs.

Sponsors & CoSponsors

Sponsor

Clark (MA)

MA • D

Cosponsors

  • Bonamici

    OR • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Gomez

    CA • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • McClellan

    VA • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Rep. Pettersen, Brittany [D-CO-7]

    CO • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

    HI • D

    Sponsored 5/8/2025

  • Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]

    PA • D

    Sponsored 7/23/2025

  • McBride

    DE • D

    Sponsored 7/23/2025

  • Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1]

    NH • D

    Sponsored 4/23/2026

Roll Call Votes

No roll call votes available for this bill.

View on Congress.gov
Back to Legislation