All Roll Calls
Yes: 417 • No: 421
Sponsored By: Representative Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Passed House
Allows Congress to disapprove multiple late‑term agency rules in a single vote. This bill would let a single joint resolution list and revoke several agency rules if each rule's report was submitted during the President's final year and it uses a standardized resolving clause naming the rules and stating they have no force or effect.
Personalized for You
Personalize government policy and PRIA will tell you what this bill means for your household, plus every other piece of legislation we track. PRIA reads each provision against your financial profile to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
1 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 0 costs, 1 mixed.
This bill would let Congress use one joint resolution to cancel more than one late-term ("midnight") agency rule at once. Each rule included would have to have had its required report submitted during the President's final year. The bill would also require a standard resolving clause that lists each rule and states, "Such rules shall have no force or effect."
Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
AZ • R
LaMalfa
CA • R
Sponsored 1/3/2025
Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]
WI • R
Sponsored 1/3/2025
Brecheen
OK • R
Sponsored 1/3/2025
Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]
TN • R
Sponsored 1/3/2025
Hageman
WY • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Haridopolos
FL • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]
GA • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Rep. Gill, Brandon [R-TX-26]
TX • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Goldman (TX)
TX • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Schmidt
KS • R
Sponsored 2/10/2025
Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]
GU • R
Sponsored 2/11/2025
Rep. Hurd, Jeff [R-CO-3]
CO • R
Sponsored 2/12/2025
All Roll Calls
Yes: 417 • No: 421
house vote • 2/12/2025
On Passage
Yes: 212 • No: 208
house vote • 2/12/2025
On Motion to Recommit
Yes: 205 • No: 213
HR38, Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2025
National concealed-carry reciprocity. This bill would create nationwide recognition of state concealed-carry licenses so people with a valid photo ID and a state permit or the right to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in many other States. - Gun owners and travelers: People not federally prohibited from firearms possession who hold a state concealed-carry license or are entitled to carry in their home State could carry a concealed handgun in States that issue permits or do not ban concealed carry. Machine guns and destructive devices are excluded. It would take effect 90 days after enactment. - State and property rights: States would keep the power to prohibit or restrict concealed carry on private property and on State or local government property. The bill also lists federal public lands and agencies where carrying would be allowed in publicly accessible areas, including National Park units and Forest Service land. - Criminal and civil protections: Officers may not arrest absent probable cause that the carry falls outside the law and prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt when the defense is raised. Prevailing defendants can recover reasonable attorney fees and may sue for deprivation of rights with damages.
HR569, Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025
Restrict who counts as "subject to the jurisdiction" for birthright citizenship by tying it to parents' legal status. This bill would rewrite the statutory definition in 8 U.S.C. 1401 to make parental status the determining factor for whether a U.S. birth qualifies under the jurisdiction test. - Families and children: A person born in the United States would be considered subject to the jurisdiction only if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen or national, a lawful permanent resident whose residence is in the United States, or an alien with lawful status who is actively serving in the armed forces. This ties eligibility to specific parental categories rather than territorial birth alone. - Noncitizen parents: Children born to parents who do not meet those listed parental statuses would not meet the statute's jurisdictional test for birthright citizenship under this framework. - Timing and grandfathering: The bill says these changes would not affect the citizenship or nationality status of anyone born before the law takes effect.
HR425, Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act
Repeals the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The bill would remove the CTA and the amendments enacted under it from the U.S. Code and then make targeted fixes to related laws. Those edits include striking references to section 5336 in Title 31, changing language in section 5322, repealing section 6502 of the Anti‑Money Laundering Act of 2020, and removing a subsection from section 6509. The draft text also contains a literal '<all>' markup at the end of the section.
HR21, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act
Mandates care and penalties for infants born alive after an abortion. This bill would set standards of care, require reporting, create criminal penalties, and allow civil suits when an infant is born alive following an abortion. - Women and families: A woman on whom an abortion is performed may sue anyone who violates the law and recover objectively verifiable medical and psychological damages, punitive damages, and statutory damages equal to three times the cost of the abortion. Courts must award reasonable attorney's fees to prevailing plaintiffs and may award fees to defendants if a suit is frivolous. - Health care practitioners and facility employees: Any practitioner present at a birth resulting from an abortion must exercise the same professional skill, care, and diligence as for any other live-born infant of the same gestational age. Practitioners or employees who know of a failure to comply must immediately report the violation to appropriate State or Federal law enforcement. - Criminal and statutory consequences: Violators face fines, up to 5 years in prison, or both, and anyone who intentionally kills a born-alive infant is punished under the murder statute. The bill also updates chapter headings and adds statutory definitions for "abortion" and "attempt."
HR1919, Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
Bars the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) or any similar digital asset. It would also stop Fed banks from offering accounts or financial products to individuals and prevent using a CBDC to carry out monetary policy, while leaving a narrow exception for an open, permissionless, privacy-preserving dollar-like currency. - Households and individuals: Would block the Fed from holding accounts for people or providing financial products directly, limiting any direct relationship between individuals and Federal Reserve banks. - Federal Reserve and monetary policy: Would ban the Board of Governors from testing, studying, developing, creating, or implementing a CBDC and bar the Fed and the Federal Open Market Committee from using a CBDC to conduct monetary policy. - Banks and intermediaries: Would forbid the Fed from indirectly offering a CBDC through banks or other intermediaries, but exempts a fully private, open, dollar-denominated currency that preserves cash-level privacy.
HR703, Main Street Tax Certainty Act
This bill would permanently preserve the qualified business income (QBI) deduction by removing the sunset provision in Internal Revenue Code section 199A. The change would apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so the deduction would be available for 2026 and later tax years. It achieves this by striking subsection (i) of section 199A and setting that effective date. Taxpayers with qualified business income would continue to claim the QBI deduction under the existing Section 199A rules for those years.
Surfaced from PRIA's policy knowledge graph, ranked by signal strength, connected by evidence.
Would block federal eminent domain for most agricultural land when a feasible alternative exists, defines covered land, and excludes tiny low‑income parcels.
Washington, D.C. — home to approximately 690,000 residents, more people than Wyoming or Vermont — is the only U.S. jurisdiction where adult citizens have no voting representation in Congress. The Cons
The Department of Education DoE is a Cabinet-level federal agency created by the Department of Education Organization Act of 1979 20 U.S.C. §§ 3401–3510. Before 1979, federal education functions were
The U.S. Department of Labor is revising its implementing regulations for Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Section 503). The revisions align the regulations with applicable law and recent executive orders, including Executive Order 14173, "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," and Executive Order 14219, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's `Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative."
“Bill HR10135 contains provision HR10135::prov_1”
Federal student aid — approximately $130 billion per year in grants, loans, and work-study — flows to students through their schools under Title IV of the Higher Education Act. But not all schools pro