No Equipment Left Behind Act of 2026
Sponsored By: Representative Hamadeh, Abraham J. [R-AZ-8]
Introduced
Summary
Accountability and controlled disposition of U.S. defense equipment in combat theaters. This bill would create a new framework requiring the Department of Defense to track, account for, and set rules for retrograde, destruction, or sale of U.S.-origin equipment in designated theaters.
Show full summary
- Would require the Department of Defense to improve property accountability and integrate monitoring across agencies, responding to past losses that include at least $7.1 billion in U.S.-funded equipment left in Afghanistan.
- Would tie disposition decisions to partner force resiliency and risk assessments to reduce enemy capture and misuse. Findings cite reported captures of about 700 trucks and Humvees and more than 2,000 armored vehicles.
- Would increase cost transparency for surplus equipment and push for disposition options that can offset costs. Findings note roughly $57.6 million in funds were accessed by the Taliban from U.S. entities.
*If enacted, the bill would aim to identify cost-neutral or cost-offsetting disposition options for surplus defense equipment, which could reduce net federal costs.*
Your PRIA Score
Personalized for You
How does this bill affect your finances?
Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this bill and every other piece of legislation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.
Bill Overview
Analyzed Economic Effects
1 provisions identified: 1 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.
New reporting rules for military equipment
This bill would require the Secretary of Defense to notify congressional defense committees within 30 days in three situations. First, after a sale or transfer tied to a major force reposturing or withdrawal. That notice would name the property, the end user, and say an assessment was done. Second, after learning an ally or partner collapses or an event raises diversion risk. That notice would describe the event, categories of property at risk, and mitigation steps taken. Third, after learning accountable property was diverted and used in an attack. That notice would identify the item if practicable, when and where it left custody, the responsible actor, and total casualties. The bill would also require a comprehensive report within 60 days of starting any significant reposturing or withdrawal. The 60-day report would list accountable property (serial numbers when practicable), custody and end-user details, proposed dispositions, feasibility and security checks, incremental cost estimates, and a mitigation plan. The mitigation plan would cover end-use monitoring, remote disablement reviews, chain-of-custody plans, and steps to secure or neutralize property if a partner collapses. One year after enactment and then annually for five years, the Secretary would send reports summarizing prior-year dispositions, incidents where major defense equipment was diverted, mitigation measures, and material changes in partner resilience. Any disposition with aggregate replacement value over $10,000,000 would need written approval from the Secretary or Deputy Secretary before proceeding. Reports must be unclassified but may include a classified annex. The bill would define the covered committees and key terms by reference to title 10.
Sponsors & CoSponsors
Sponsor
Hamadeh, Abraham J. [R-AZ-8]
AZ • R
Cosponsors
Rep. Mills, Cory [R-FL-7]
FL • R
Sponsored 6/10/2026
Rep. McDowell, Addison P. [R-NC-6]
NC • R
Sponsored 6/23/2026
Rep. Davis, Donald G. [D-NC-1]
NC • D
Sponsored 6/23/2026
Roll Call Votes
No roll call votes available for this bill.
View on Congress.gov