2025-19740RuleWallet

DHS Tightens Screws on False Claims with New Penalties

Published Date: 11/2/2025

Rule

Summary

Starting November 3, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security is updating how it handles cases of fraud to recover money and impose penalties. This change affects anyone involved in DHS programs by raising penalty amounts, clarifying rules, and letting special judges handle disputes. These updates come from a new law aiming to keep government funds safe and make the process smoother and fairer.

Analyzed Economic Effects

8 provisions identified: 0 benefits, 7 costs, 1 mixed.

Maximum Claim Threshold Raised

DHS raises the maximum value of disputed claims that a presiding officer may hear from $150,000 to $1,000,000. The $1,000,000 ceiling will be adjusted annually for inflation under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act.

Recovered Funds First Reimburse Agency Costs

Amounts collected under AFCA will first be credited to reimburse the Federal entity that expended investigation or prosecution costs, and those reimbursed amounts remain available until expended; any remaining amounts are deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the U.S. Treasury.

Longer Statute of Limitations Window

DHS adopts the AFCA limitation that an action may be brought not later than the later of: 6 years after the violation or 3 years after the authority head knew (or reasonably should have known) the facts, but in no event more than 10 years after the violation.

No Private Qui Tam Participation

Under the AFCA as implemented, private plaintiffs (qui tam relators) do not participate in DHS AFCA hearings. The parties to a hearing will be the Defendant and the Authority only.

Assessments Up To Twice The Claim

If the Government made a payment on a claim, a person subject to penalty may also be assessed not more than twice the amount of the Claim (an assessment of up to 2x the claimed amount), which in most cases is in lieu of damages.

Broader Definition of Claim and Material Terms

DHS updates definitions so a 'Claim' includes requests or submissions that conceal or improperly avoid or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit property, services, or money, and adopts the meanings of 'Material' and 'Obligation' from 31 U.S.C. 3729(b).

Board Judges May Serve as Presiding Officers

DHS allows members of a board of contract appeals to serve as Presiding Officers when DHS does not employ or have an available Administrative Law Judge. When a board judge serves, the hearing will follow the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Rules of Procedure.

AG Notice Required Before Settlement

Before entering any agreement to compromise or settle allegations under 31 U.S.C. 3802, the Reviewing Official must notify the Attorney General in writing not later than 30 days before entering the agreement.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Rule Effective
11/2/2025
11/3/2025

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Homeland Security Department
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in