2026-01647Rule

Approved: Hotter Nuclear Fuel Storage Casks with Fixed Safety Details

Published Date: 1/28/2026

Rule

Summary

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission updated the rules for storing spent nuclear fuel using TN Americas’ NUHOMS EOS system. The new changes let the system handle hotter fuel canisters safely, fix some small surface flaws rules, and clean up the paperwork for easier reading. These updates kick in on April 13, 2026, and mainly affect nuclear plant operators using this storage system, with no big cost changes expected.

Analyzed Economic Effects

5 provisions identified: 5 benefits, 0 costs, 0 mixed.

Approval avoids exemption costs

If Amendment No. 5 were not approved, 10 CFR part 72 general licensees seeking to load spent fuel under the changes would have to request exemptions from Sec. 72.212 and 72.214, increasing administrative burden and costs to each licensee. Approval allows licensees to use the modified cask design under the general license instead.

Allows hotter fuel in EOS-37PTH cans

Power reactor licensees using the NUHOMS EOS-37PTH can now store canisters with a maximum heat load of 54 kW per dry shielded canister (DSC) in the EOS-Horizontal Storage Module and transfer them using EOS-TC125/135. This change is part of Amendment No. 5 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1042 and becomes effective April 13, 2026.

Clarifies minor surface imperfection rules

The amendment clarifies acceptance criteria for minor surface imperfections on high strength low-alloy (HSLA) basket plates in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. This clarification applies to the NUHOMS EOS design changes described in Amendment No. 5.

Applies only to new casks; no retrofit mandate

Amendment No. 5 applies only to new casks fabricated and used under Amendment No. 5; existing users of the NUHOMS EOS system are not required to adopt the changes and may comply voluntarily. The amendment becomes effective April 13, 2026.

No significant environmental or radiation impact

The NRC found Amendment No. 5 will not cause any significant increase in effluents, individual or cumulative radiation exposures, or the potential for radiological accidents, and that any occupational or offsite doses would remain within 10 CFR part 20 limits. The NRC made a Finding of No Significant Impact under NEPA.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
Rule Effective
1/28/2026
2/27/2026
4/13/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in