2026-05791Proposed RuleWallet

Railroads Get Faster Green Light: Surface Board Reforms Permitting Rules

Published Date: 3/25/2026

Proposed Rule

Summary

The Surface Transportation Board is updating its environmental review rules to make rail project approvals faster and clearer. These changes affect rail companies and anyone involved in rail construction, aiming to cut red tape while protecting the environment. Comments on the new rules are open until April 24, 2026, helping shape a smoother, smarter rail system that saves time and money.

Analyzed Economic Effects

6 provisions identified: 4 benefits, 1 costs, 1 mixed.

Many Abandonments Skip NEPA Review

The Board would categorically exclude many abandonments and discontinuances from further environmental review when they would not cause salvage prior to consummation or entry into an interim trail use agreement and would not divert traffic above the Board's thresholds. The Board's traffic thresholds include an increase of at least 100% in gross ton miles annually or an increase of at least eight trains per day.

Faster EA/EIS Timelines and Fewer Drafts

The Board proposes several NEPA process changes: reduce the EIS prefiling notice from six months to 45 days; require applicants in many EA cases to give written notice 45 days before seeking Board authority; generally publish a single EA or EIS document (instead of draft then final); and incorporate statutory deadlines and page limits from recent NEPA amendments. The Board also adds procedures for applicants who elect to proceed under NEPA section 112, which authorizes project sponsors to pay a fee to obtain shortened NEPA review deadlines.

Solid Waste Transfer Permits Need EIS

For land-use-exemption permit applications for solid waste rail transfer facilities under the Clean Railroads Act, the Board concludes that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should normally be prepared for each application because these facilities have the potential for significant environmental impacts.

OEA Director Granted Faster Authority

The Board proposes to move and expand delegations so the Director of the Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) can make more environmental and historic-review decisions directly. The Director would be re-delegated responsibilities such as determining whether to impose, modify, or remove environmental and historic conditions and, in abandonment notice-of-exemption proceedings, issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).

Connecting Track Often Exempted From Review

The Board proposes a categorical exclusion for construction of connecting track located within an existing right-of-way or on land owned by the connecting railroads or the applicant, meaning such projects normally would not require an EA or EIS.

Rules for Applicant-Prepared Reports Tightened

The Board would limit applicant-prepared environmental reports to abandonment and discontinuance cases, change the information required in those reports, require applicants who file environmental reports to begin agency consultations earlier, and create procedures for applicant-prepared EAs and EISs. These steps are intended to expedite review while ensuring earlier agency engagement.

Your PRIA Score

Score Hidden

Personalized for You

How does this regulation affect your finances?

Sign up for a PRIA Policy Scan to see your personalized alignment score for this federal register document and every other regulation we track. We analyze your financial profile against policy provisions to show you exactly what matters to your wallet.

Free to start

Key Dates

Published Date
Comments Due
3/25/2026
4/24/2026

Department and Agencies

Department
Independent Agency
Agency
Surface Transportation Board
Source: View HTML

Related Federal Register Documents

Previous / Next Documents

Back to Federal Register

Take It Personal

Get Your Personalized Policy View

Start a Free Government Policy Watch to see how policy affects your household, then upgrade to PRIA Full Coverage for year-round monitoring.

Already have an account? Sign in